The Big Ideas of 2012

A Message Entangled With Its Form

The deeper tones of Occupy.
A Message Entangled with its Form
Senén Llanos

Audio version read by George Atherton – Right-click to download

As I walk through lush Brownstone Brooklyn at night, I try to reconcile the stillness that pervades these streets with the urgency of Liberty Plaza. I wonder, did I lose touch with the beauty of the wet bluestone and wrought iron gates somewhere along the course of one of my many feverish runs to the 4/5 station to get to Wall Street?

I know that I’m young, and sometimes it’s hard to tell whether the quaking I feel is the strength of my own heartbeat or the earth moving under my feet. I wonder if it’s impossible at any age to have perspective from the midst of something that resembles a movement; I imagine the view from the middle of the General Assembly looks dramatically different than the one from a calmer, more static place.

Yet the quaking earth hypothesis is supported by the fact that perhaps the sight from Liberty Plaza is similar to the one a person might have glimpsed from Tahrir Square, from Madison’s Capitol Square, from Ben-Gurion Boulevard, from among the indignados in Madrid and the protests in Greece. In Liberty Plaza, occupiers’ disaffection is part of a powerful surge of global discontent, a surge that is manifesting itself in the collective realization of bodies and voices as strategic tools for communication and collective action.

Many feel an immediacy springing from a loss of stability, an affordable education, a job, a home, a pension, health insurance, that we had taken for granted. Even those who don’t face immediately precarious situations are admitting to themselves that something has been terribly wrong for some time. We watched as our government deregulated the market and then bailed out the banks whose criminal activities led to the financial implosion; as they cut the taxes of the rich while 15% of American families fell below the poverty line; as they spent billions of dollars on imperial wars that divert money away from education and infrastructure and from any real solution to avert environmental degradation. If we’ve been apathetic, its because we’ve failed to see how to act. We have learned to be wary of “Change.” We lack faith in our politicians, entrenched as they are in the impotent theatrics of the two-party system.

Yet in Liberty Plaza people find themselves confronted with a radically inclusive new platform. In the horizontality of this platform, many who are disaffected now see a means of engagement that is immediate and real. If Occupy Wall Street has failed to use this platform to limit itself to a discrete set of demands, it is because it refuses to undermine the depth and breadth of what’s wrong. OWS’s message is entangled with its form, its self-sustaining structure in which the group provides for its own physical, social and intellectual needs. Given the group’s collective intelligence, it is becoming evident that its members can teach each other as much as, if not more than any, institution can.

Much has been made of the people’s microphone. When it works, its power is immense. People within hearing range chant each other’s words to convey them to those standing on the periphery of the larger group. Each person pits herself between the mouth of the speaker and the ear of the listener in a manner that is both self-affirming and egoless. Loudly echoing the voice of another feels a bit like cursing, a vigorous and strangely gratifying speech act.

Occupiers are learning to use their bodies in ways that break with the modes of moving circumscribed by our culture of efficiency and the near-total encroachment of privatized space. Its members are learning how to stay in one place, how to civilly disobey, how to dumpster dive, how to interrupt auction proceedings. They are also confronting their bodies and the bodies of others, the cold, the rain, the smells and needs that bodies have that we can deal with so quickly in the comfort of the office and the home.

Occupy Wall Street is streamed, tweeted, posted and reposted. It is a curiosity, a screen for projection, a spectator sport, everyone’s favorite and most hated child. Yet people continue to come daily who earnestly want to join or to aid the effort. OWS has become a receptacle for the lost progressive hopes of a previous generation. Despite the attempts of some media sources to caricature the occupiers, they constitute a diverse group that is attracting even more diversity. OWS has gained the support of many labor unions and community groups. Most importantly, its existence is enabling a necessary discourse to enter the mainstream.

Liberty Plaza can also be an immensely frustrating, anxiety-provoking and chaotic space. Sometimes the chaos threatens to prevail and dissolve the whole. This is a particular risk now: as its numbers grow, OWS must become capable of incorporating interested parties in meaningful ways and must begin a real conversation about its own future. Yet in this heightened unknown many sense something uncanny, something real that feels unreal because it has been suppressed by layers and layers of banal culture, farcical politics and corporate sterility. They see a spark of true, systemic indeterminacy, in contrast to the systems entrenched by the collusion of money and power.

Occupy Wall Street is still a writhing, inchoate entity, yet it has a structure that can and must beget more structure. Its future is totally unknown, but the commitment among OWS’s ranks, the resonance of its message, and the appreciation so many feel for the rupture it presents from the status quo, assures me that this occupation will persist, whatever this persistence looks like. Perhaps the group will recognize the naivety of the dreams of its most utopian members, and compromise soon to settle on a list of specific economic demands. Occupiers are smart and knowledgeable, and have big, open ears to those even more so. More probably the occupation will continue to grow, to spread to other cities, to protest, and to self-determine, choosing to partake in a society whose structure its members believe in, rather than one corrupted to the point of disrepair.

In my more lucid moments, I know that Occupy Wall Street is a lichen that is preparing the intractable political ground for more substantive plant growth. In my dreams, however, Occupy Wall Street will evince its true self not when the media and well-meaning liberals tell it to produce a message, nor when it hands over its momentum to sympathetic, institutionalized political groups, but when the egalitarian entity it has created itself yields some kind of answer.

Nicole Demby is a writer and critic living in Brooklyn.

78 comments on the article “A Message Entangled With Its Form”

Displaying 31 - 40 of 78

Page 4 of 8

Anonymous

Protest has its place and is sometimes the only way to bring about a meaningful change. I'm thinking of the Arab Spring when I say this.

The difference with the Occupy Movement is that you're not oppressed. You're not fearful for your lives. You don't have to meet in clandestine conditions for fear of who might be watching or listening.

You're just angry. And alot of us are. No one likes the way Western Democracy has been corrupted by the insatiable greed of a handful of men. No one likes that the poorest in our societies suffer while those at the top become even wealthier.

But the Occupy movement will gain no followers as long as it presents itself as some sort of revolutionary collective. Because what the real 99% see when they see an Occupy camp, is a group of angry middle-class people sleeping in tents made in factories by people too poor to ever contemplate the luxury of an extended protest.

You also update progress on the revolution using Macbooks and iPhones. Yes social media was vital in the Arab Spring, but they were fighting for democracy. What is Occupy actually fighting for? If you're fighting against merciless capitalism, then you must realise the irony of your technologically empowered struggle.

I firmly support a change from the current economic model, but you have to present the 99% with the alternative. You have to show them that you have thought about what comes next, and how it will work. The real 99% has to trust you.

That is why the Tea-Party has gained a huge following. They spread a message that resonates with the dissatisfied middle, and they presented a 'workable' alternative that people could vote for.

Occupy must present itself in the same way to gain enough support to make real change.

Yes you might say that you want to do away with 'politics' completely, but politics is how 99% of people understand the process that governs their lives. Those people have to trust you before you can change their lives.

Good luck. You'll need it.

Anonymous

Protest has its place and is sometimes the only way to bring about a meaningful change. I'm thinking of the Arab Spring when I say this.

The difference with the Occupy Movement is that you're not oppressed. You're not fearful for your lives. You don't have to meet in clandestine conditions for fear of who might be watching or listening.

You're just angry. And alot of us are. No one likes the way Western Democracy has been corrupted by the insatiable greed of a handful of men. No one likes that the poorest in our societies suffer while those at the top become even wealthier.

But the Occupy movement will gain no followers as long as it presents itself as some sort of revolutionary collective. Because what the real 99% see when they see an Occupy camp, is a group of angry middle-class people sleeping in tents made in factories by people too poor to ever contemplate the luxury of an extended protest.

You also update progress on the revolution using Macbooks and iPhones. Yes social media was vital in the Arab Spring, but they were fighting for democracy. What is Occupy actually fighting for? If you're fighting against merciless capitalism, then you must realise the irony of your technologically empowered struggle.

I firmly support a change from the current economic model, but you have to present the 99% with the alternative. You have to show them that you have thought about what comes next, and how it will work. The real 99% has to trust you.

That is why the Tea-Party has gained a huge following. They spread a message that resonates with the dissatisfied middle, and they presented a 'workable' alternative that people could vote for.

Occupy must present itself in the same way to gain enough support to make real change.

Yes you might say that you want to do away with 'politics' completely, but politics is how 99% of people understand the process that governs their lives. Those people have to trust you before you can change their lives.

Good luck. You'll need it.

Anonymous

You mean the OWS movement particpants, like the Israelis in Tel Aviv, are not oppressed but demanding a larger piece of pie stlen from the Natives.

http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/08/05/israels-jewish-spring-comes-to-washington/

Anonymous

You mean the OWS movement particpants, like the Israelis in Tel Aviv, are not oppressed but demanding a larger piece of pie stlen from the Natives.

http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2011/08/05/israels-jewish-spring-comes-to-washington/

Anonymous

I wouldn't compare OWS movement to the Israelis in any way. As far as I know, the OWS movement doesn't engage in murder.

Anonymous

I wouldn't compare OWS movement to the Israelis in any way. As far as I know, the OWS movement doesn't engage in murder.

one two three four!

the ows critique that they use technology to achieve their ends is a silly attempt to label this a bourgeoisie revolution is akin to slaves using their masters tools to start a revolt .. people have and will use what is available to them to achieve their goals.
On the contrary it seems they have figured out that the best method was to realize the movement and join the ranks of working class people to support them in their struggles against their financial masters. Joining with working class people not only has the effect of destroying space and time, it forms news comraderies in real time with those who can also be influence by right wing populism.

Hopefully this is a moment of radicalization of the positions of many people who are at the point of nothing to lose. Modern revolutionary protest is not a bunch of kids repeating May '68 rather its the whole country consisting of all classes creating the paris commune everywhere. In the meantime lets be patient

one two three four!

the ows critique that they use technology to achieve their ends is a silly attempt to label this a bourgeoisie revolution is akin to slaves using their masters tools to start a revolt .. people have and will use what is available to them to achieve their goals.
On the contrary it seems they have figured out that the best method was to realize the movement and join the ranks of working class people to support them in their struggles against their financial masters. Joining with working class people not only has the effect of destroying space and time, it forms news comraderies in real time with those who can also be influence by right wing populism.

Hopefully this is a moment of radicalization of the positions of many people who are at the point of nothing to lose. Modern revolutionary protest is not a bunch of kids repeating May '68 rather its the whole country consisting of all classes creating the paris commune everywhere. In the meantime lets be patient

Anonymous

I am concerned at the loss of the commons represented by the coordinated recent police take-downs. We have - unintentionally - pointed out to what extent the commons - as physical space in which people can peaceably assemble - have been destroyed in this corporatocracy.

We should not allow that to be taken.

Perhaps we should do an alternate - online broadcast of the Corporation's Tournament of Roses - to compliment the coda occupying the tail of the march after the police "closure" has passed and network television has been turned off.

Anonymous

I am concerned at the loss of the commons represented by the coordinated recent police take-downs. We have - unintentionally - pointed out to what extent the commons - as physical space in which people can peaceably assemble - have been destroyed in this corporatocracy.

We should not allow that to be taken.

Perhaps we should do an alternate - online broadcast of the Corporation's Tournament of Roses - to compliment the coda occupying the tail of the march after the police "closure" has passed and network television has been turned off.

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.