The Big Ideas of 2011

Activism after Clicktivism

How to energize the political left.
Activism after Clicktivism

Audio version read by George Atherton – Right-click to download

This article is available in:

For more than a decade revolutionaries and culture jammers have been paralyzed by the computer screen. Trusting the promises of technocrats and digital visionaries, dazzled by the viral hype surrounding MoveOn and the like, we’ve come to rely far too heavily on a particular form of internet organizing. Believing that clicktivism could spark social change, we deployed market-tested messaging, glitzy Ajax websites and social networking apps. We entrusted our revolution to San Francisco techies and put our faith in the methods of advertising. But we have become so dependent on digital gimmicks that our revolutionary potential is now constrained.

Clicktivism is the pollution of activism with the logic of consumerism. Activism is debased with advertising and computer science. What defines clicktivism is an obsession with metrics. Each link clicked and email opened is meticulously monitored. Subject lines are A/B tested and talking points focus-grouped. Clicktivists dilute their messages for mass appeal and make calls to action that are easy, insignificant and impotent. Their sole campaign objective is to inflate participation percentages, not to overthrow the status quo. In the end, social change is marketed like a brand of toilet paper.

The fundamental problem with this technocratic approach is that metrics value only what is measurable. Clicktivism neglects the vital, immeasurable inner events and personal epiphanies that great social ruptures are actually made of. The history of revolutions attests that upheaval is always improbable, unpredictable and risky. A few banal pronouncements about “democracy in action” coupled with an online petition will not usher in social transformation. As Malcolm Gladwell put it recently, “activism that challenges the status quo – that attacks deeply rooted problems – is not for the faint of heart.” Clicktivism reinforces the fear of standing out from the crowd and taking a strong position. It discourages calling for drastic action. And as such, clicktivism will never breed social revolution. To think that it will is a fallacy. One that is dawning on us.

The demise of clicktivism is rebooting activism. It is setting off a paradigm shift in social change that opens the door to a new generation of activists. This rejuvenation is emboldened by three tactical insights: revolutions spring from epiphanies; the internet is best suited for memewar; and daring real-world actions are the indispensable foundation of social change.

Gone is trust in watered-down talking points and the “best practices” of keyboard messiahs. Metrics are being forgotten, website logs deleted, analytics ignored. Instead, passionate poetry is regaining precedence. The challenge of sparking epiphanies is the new revolutionary priority. But this does not mean we shut our eyes entirely to the potential of technology.

On the contrary, the next generation of activists will readily acknowledge that the internet plays a crucial tactical role. In the battle for the mind, the speedy dissemination of mindbombs, image-ambushes and thought-viruses is strategically essential. This is memewar, after all, and the web levels the battlefield against the propagandists of consumerism.

Still, real-world action is the only way to achieve social revolution. Clicking a link can never replace taking to the streets. Nor can we rely on digital technologies to get people off the screens.

Activism is scary. Social change is initially unpopular and insurrection always starts with disobedience. Trepidation is, therefore, the healthy response to the realities of culture jamming. Moments before victory, every revolutionary has felt the gut-pang of anxiety. But clicktivism encourages us to shirk these emotions, to hide behind the mouse, to embrace the inaction of passive clicking. Against this tendency, let us welcome butterflies back into our bellies.

Activism will be reborn when culture jammers find strength in the exhilaration of resistance, the intensity of protest and the emotions unleashed by taking part in upheaval.

Micah White is a Contributing Editor at Adbusters and an independent activist. He lives in Berkeley and is writing a book about the future of activism. www.micahmwhite.com or micah (at) adbusters.org

48 comments on the article “Activism after Clicktivism”

Displaying 1 - 10 of 48

Page 1 of 5

Proud Online Ac...

Yawn. Move on Micah White. Long live the Internet and Activism! PS Love the fact that this article asks you to click on a link, talk about shooting yourself in the foot(note)! Yep, that how it works!

Proud Online Ac...

Yawn. Move on Micah White. Long live the Internet and Activism! PS Love the fact that this article asks you to click on a link, talk about shooting yourself in the foot(note)! Yep, that how it works!

Anonymous

The link is to a site organizing MEET UPS. That's IRL to speak in your terms. Go ahead and keep clicking that petition button.
Is anyone listening?

Anonymous

The link is to a site organizing MEET UPS. That's IRL to speak in your terms. Go ahead and keep clicking that petition button.
Is anyone listening?

Proud Online Ac...

Yes, thanks for remaking my point. The critique of this article conveniently forgets that online/offline organising is widespread and 'clicktivism', in your terms, is the 'way in' for many. Civil society is full of growing and successful campaigning groups that know this. Petitions are creating change every day, if used effectively as part of a campaign strategy - as they have done since the anti-slavery movement and before. I've coordinated online campaigns that inspired 100, 000s of people to get involved in political action 'IRL' - it started with a click, for many their first step to be a changemaker. That's what's great about online. Many argue that days of action like BND are superficial, like how you feel about 'clicktivism' (days-of-action-ism anyone?). The truth is we need all the tools and tactics we can muster - and to use them well.

Proud Online Ac...

Yes, thanks for remaking my point. The critique of this article conveniently forgets that online/offline organising is widespread and 'clicktivism', in your terms, is the 'way in' for many. Civil society is full of growing and successful campaigning groups that know this. Petitions are creating change every day, if used effectively as part of a campaign strategy - as they have done since the anti-slavery movement and before. I've coordinated online campaigns that inspired 100, 000s of people to get involved in political action 'IRL' - it started with a click, for many their first step to be a changemaker. That's what's great about online. Many argue that days of action like BND are superficial, like how you feel about 'clicktivism' (days-of-action-ism anyone?). The truth is we need all the tools and tactics we can muster - and to use them well.

candicethelost

although i participate in many on-line petition signings, i still find myself able to take the time to talk with people on the street about many types of activism.
this article is important because it challenges you, it makes you question your inner activist, it shines the light on the shady corner of fear that clicktivism only dimly stirs when it prompts you for your full home address. my point is that in the end, i'm left feeling challenged, and hopefully like many of you i can proudly rise to occasion.
the internet has many great supplementary uses, but let's not forget what clicktivists and activists and most importantly, what people, are fighting for. the only way to truly do that is to interact on a personal level, battle isolation, stir hearts and minds, and see in the flesh what we need to change and what we desperately need to fight to save.

candicethelost

although i participate in many on-line petition signings, i still find myself able to take the time to talk with people on the street about many types of activism.
this article is important because it challenges you, it makes you question your inner activist, it shines the light on the shady corner of fear that clicktivism only dimly stirs when it prompts you for your full home address. my point is that in the end, i'm left feeling challenged, and hopefully like many of you i can proudly rise to occasion.
the internet has many great supplementary uses, but let's not forget what clicktivists and activists and most importantly, what people, are fighting for. the only way to truly do that is to interact on a personal level, battle isolation, stir hearts and minds, and see in the flesh what we need to change and what we desperately need to fight to save.

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.