The Big Ideas of 2010

New Possibilities for Australia

We’ve had our snout up Uncle Sam’s bum for 65 years
Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd with US President Barack Obama

Australia today seems like a utopia of opportunity, tolerance and good intentions. Its greatest assets remain free to all comers: the space of the outback, the thrill of tropical forests, the endless beaches, the beauty of a stroll through Sydney Opera House and its foreshores. Our arts thrive, our catwalks buzz, our scientists win Nobel prizes. As a people we are still relatively laid back and unpretentious, thanks to an antiauthoritarian streak that arrived with the white settlers – mainly convicts – and is still part of our makeup.

On sunny days at Bondi beach cheerfulness abounds: toddlers delirious with buckets and spades, jocks tossing balls, Japanese tourists flinging off shoes, board riders slicing the foam. Our prime minister, Kevin Rudd, is highly educated, hardworking and smart, a bit of a goody-goody and no friend of edgy art. His government’s policies seem to have shielded Australia from the worst of the financial meltdown. Rudd speaks fluent Mandarin and never sleeps. When he flies to New York his first lunch date is with Rupert Murdoch, whose neocon tentacles grip the West by the balls. Our sole national newspaper, the Australian, a filtered version of Fox News, proclaims on the masthead that it’s “the heart of the nation,” though it reads like the soul of Murdoch. Israel can do no wrong, terror stalks our doorstep, refugees are poised to invade! Never mind that many are fleeing the wars we backed and that more will arrive as the sea levels rise.

Because of our small population, 22 million, Australians often feel the need to boast. We “punch above our weight,” our banks are the “best in the world,” we stand up for human rights, the impoverished, the underdog. Actually we stand up for the top dogs more often. We court billionaires, casino proprietors and Uncle Sam: rushing our troops to concocted wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, without a debate in Parliament or much of a fuss from the electorate. It was an Australian General who directed the 2004 pacification of Fallujah, though few here are aware of his role and the brutality of the assault.

Australians are easily distracted. The focus of mass media is shopping promotions and light entertainment: cooking, sport, gossip, stock shifts, celebrity trials, soft porn and big-ticket “must see” events. Forget about Fallujah, let’s “create the perfect falafel.”

Australia’s soft public image often conceals a heart of darkness. We even have secret trials. Australian citizen Mamdouh Habib is seeking compensation in the federal court for rendition, false imprisonment and multiple acts of torture. At the latest hearing Habib was expelled from the proceedings, along with his defence team, so those implicated in the affair could present evidence in secret. “My phones are tapped and my family tailed,” said Habib’s defence lawyer. “It’s like something out of The Bourne Conspiracy.”

While the surface mood of Australia is jolly and most bellies are full, not everyone thrives in this lucky country. The life expectancy of indigenous Australians is shockingly low. Despite a vocal grassroots movement working for the rights of asylum seekers, some have been falsely imprisoned and even sent back to their homelands, often with dire consequences. There are outbursts of racism, but less so than elsewhere. In the ’50s and ’60s it was aimed at the Italians and Greeks, now it is the Muslims who cop it. In shops, houses and cars, Australian flags have started to sprout like opium poppies in Afghanistan.

The mood of Australia in 2010? It’s bipolar: anxious on Monday, cheerful on Tuesday. Sometimes there’s a subliminal pounding in our ears, an echo of war drums, the dread of encountering something nasty in the woodshed, or maybe the coal shed. Thump, thump, thump. Why don’t we feel secure? We’ve had our snout up Uncle Sam’s bum for 65 years and we’re inching ever closer to Asia, so what is it that bugs us? After all, it’s not hard to make a quid. Stick a shovel in the ground and sell the rubble to China. Easy. Except our sunburned country is getting hotter by the minute: Agricultural lands are parched and forests can become infernos, demolishing entire communities. Our coral reefs are dying and the restless ocean undermines infrastructure – half a million addresses in Australia are less than four meters above the sea. Sure, we are busy planting, innovating, engineering, arguing, whistling a happy tune, but too many remain in denial. Adjustments are incremental, caution is king. We would rather be “early followers” than lead the pack. Okay, that’s the dark phase.

On the brighter side: We are adaptable, resilient and keen to help each other in times of crisis. As we start to roll up our sleeves and tackle the interlocking network of future threats, even sport – our dominant religion – may soon be relegated to a second-order diversion. In its own laconic way the mood of Australia in 2010 is transforming into one of determination, improvisation and all hands on deck. Oil drought? We’ll turn bush into fuel, ride bikes, start car pools. Water shortages? We’ll bathe with friends, desalinate, drink vodka. Food shortages? We’ll permaculture our backyards, create vertical gardens, eat lentils.

Cash once squandered for “must-have” baubles will be redirected to harnessing small-scale technologies and alternative energies, which will in turn nourish alternative modes of thinking. We are likely to witness more change in the next two decades than in the last hundred years. Young Australians are already seizing the moment; launching NGOs, blogs and websites to keep coal in the ground, politicians on their toes and voters informed. Today’s youth are funny and smart, hurling themselves into the knowledge revolution and putting the planet first. The mood on campus is different to my day – it’s less about sex, drugs and rock and roll, and more about safe sex, rescuing the future and hot rocks. To live on the brink of change is both scary and exciting. While tycoons and politicians grudgingly slouch toward a post-carbon civilization, a huge slab of citizens is way ahead of them: dreaming new dreams, the wind in their sails, ready for what lies ahead.

Richard Neville is an author and feral futurist based in Australia. richardneville.com

18 comments on the article “New Possibilities for Australia”

Displaying 1 - 10 of 18

Page 1 of 2

Dxs

Richard Neville is a motivational speaker. Like any typical motivational speaker, his intention is to skew a situation and make it sound positive. Because obviously being positive encourages hope, which in turn increases motivation. Unfortunately if one wants to be real, Neville’s comments are quite off the mark and quite vague too. His comments are welcomed if you want to live in a fantasy land of distraction, but if you are like me and want to live in reality, well things aren’t so great.

Firstly, desalination. He classes that as ‘improvisation’. How many million is it costing the country? How many hundreds of thousands of cars is one desal’s plants co2 output per year equivalent to (there are going to be many plants)? How does the ‘brine’ left over effect the oceans it is poured into? Seriously, how about some water tanks for homes or some real improvisation?

Then we have the prime minister, Rudd (equiv to the democrats Obama). Labels himself as an economic conservative. This government is currently trying to bring in a filter for the censorship of the internet. Also has set very weak co2 emission targets and is compensating big polluters (Australia is one of the top 3 co2 polluters per capita), yet he is still the highest in the polls.

Then Neville states a ‘big slab’ (aka unfounded) number of people are dreaming beyond the politics for a better future, and our youth will save us. Well recent reports have said the gen y’s (which I am one of) of this country brought the country out of recession due to their spending habits. So really, please, everyone always looks at the USA as the big baddy (which it is), and Australia is really just a wannabe USA. Instead add an article about Denmark or the Netherlands, not crap like this from a motivational speaker who will talk all vaguely if you will give him money. It would be better to talk about the issues facing Australia, rather than ignore them and make out as though everything is going just fine.

Dxs

Richard Neville is a motivational speaker. Like any typical motivational speaker, his intention is to skew a situation and make it sound positive. Because obviously being positive encourages hope, which in turn increases motivation. Unfortunately if one wants to be real, Neville’s comments are quite off the mark and quite vague too. His comments are welcomed if you want to live in a fantasy land of distraction, but if you are like me and want to live in reality, well things aren’t so great.

Firstly, desalination. He classes that as ‘improvisation’. How many million is it costing the country? How many hundreds of thousands of cars is one desal’s plants co2 output per year equivalent to (there are going to be many plants)? How does the ‘brine’ left over effect the oceans it is poured into? Seriously, how about some water tanks for homes or some real improvisation?

Then we have the prime minister, Rudd (equiv to the democrats Obama). Labels himself as an economic conservative. This government is currently trying to bring in a filter for the censorship of the internet. Also has set very weak co2 emission targets and is compensating big polluters (Australia is one of the top 3 co2 polluters per capita), yet he is still the highest in the polls.

Then Neville states a ‘big slab’ (aka unfounded) number of people are dreaming beyond the politics for a better future, and our youth will save us. Well recent reports have said the gen y’s (which I am one of) of this country brought the country out of recession due to their spending habits. So really, please, everyone always looks at the USA as the big baddy (which it is), and Australia is really just a wannabe USA. Instead add an article about Denmark or the Netherlands, not crap like this from a motivational speaker who will talk all vaguely if you will give him money. It would be better to talk about the issues facing Australia, rather than ignore them and make out as though everything is going just fine.

ken vallario

i agree with the previous comment, this article was vague and left me wondering if there was a point...i was inspired by the previous speaker to look at his website...here is a quote i found in the about page:

Richard’s clients include blue chip brand names, stuffy banks, nervous universities, Government departments, media groups, NGO’s, insurance giants, the tourist industry, developers, anti developers, tiny country towns afraid of dying, throbbing cities afraid of choking, the national parks [“The Future of Leisure”], ad agencies, accountants, professional associations, liquor chains, high schools, the military, the Federal Police and more.

ken vallario

i agree with the previous comment, this article was vague and left me wondering if there was a point...i was inspired by the previous speaker to look at his website...here is a quote i found in the about page:

Richard’s clients include blue chip brand names, stuffy banks, nervous universities, Government departments, media groups, NGO’s, insurance giants, the tourist industry, developers, anti developers, tiny country towns afraid of dying, throbbing cities afraid of choking, the national parks [“The Future of Leisure”], ad agencies, accountants, professional associations, liquor chains, high schools, the military, the Federal Police and more.

Knobel

One of the things that has always bothered me about Adbusters is how you give credit (or lack there of) to the people who make images for articles. The images are expertly chosen, and are given the visual real estate and weight that implies they are driving the story. Yet the image credit is almost hidden. Coy even. There should be a visual indicator that there is an image credit. An eye or camera or plus symbol for example. Give some credit where it is due - images drive the story in partnership with the words.

Knobel

One of the things that has always bothered me about Adbusters is how you give credit (or lack there of) to the people who make images for articles. The images are expertly chosen, and are given the visual real estate and weight that implies they are driving the story. Yet the image credit is almost hidden. Coy even. There should be a visual indicator that there is an image credit. An eye or camera or plus symbol for example. Give some credit where it is due - images drive the story in partnership with the words.

McLarry

This article seemed to take an abrupt turn about 3/4 of the way through it. I found myself extremely intrigued and then extremely let down by the anti-climatic ending. Oh well, there was some decent information to be gained. Life goes on.

McLarry

This article seemed to take an abrupt turn about 3/4 of the way through it. I found myself extremely intrigued and then extremely let down by the anti-climatic ending. Oh well, there was some decent information to be gained. Life goes on.

Grumpy

What is disturbing about this article is that I first thought that it was a Canadian commentary. If you replaced Australian with Canadian through out the article, no Canadian would have noticed. Canadians have the same delusions about themselves and the world around them. Mono culture, mono thought. Life goes on, such as it is, in the Matrix.

Grumpy

What is disturbing about this article is that I first thought that it was a Canadian commentary. If you replaced Australian with Canadian through out the article, no Canadian would have noticed. Canadians have the same delusions about themselves and the world around them. Mono culture, mono thought. Life goes on, such as it is, in the Matrix.

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.