The Big Ideas of 2010

What Do You See?

Is your brain East or West?
Is your brain East or West?
IMAGES COURTESY TAKAHIKO MASUDA

A plainclothes cop walks into a diner and finds no less than five gun-wielding criminals holding up the crowded joint. “We’re not just going to let you walk out of here,” the cop says. “Who’s we, sucka?” says one of the criminals. “Smith and Wesson and me,” says the cop. He draws his Smith & Wesson and – in a crowded diner – shoots four of the criminals and advances on the last gunman, who’s holding a pistol to a hostage’s head. One itchy trigger finger and the hostage could be dead. The cop glares at the criminal. “Go ahead, make my day.” The cop is “Dirty Harry” Callahan, but really he could be any Hollywood hero. The movie is Sudden Impact, but really it could be any movie or book or manifestation of Western culture.

With a few modern updates, Western culture has been re-creating the same story over and over again since Homer collected The Odyssey more than two and a half thousand years ago. Since the Greeks, the ideal of the unique and strong individual has become so prevalent in Western culture that we have stopped realizing that it is even part of our culture. Often we mistake our perceptions of the world for how the world really is.

Psychologists have long known that North Americans overestimate their own distinctiveness, especially in comparison with East Asians. When asked to describe themselves, Americans and Canadians tend to talk about their individual personality and personal outlook more than Japanese do. North Americans tend to settle arguments in terms of right and wrong, whereas East Asians tend to seek compromises. Dirty Harry is an extreme and violent example, but he is emblematic of Western culture and he sums up our single-minded, goal-oriented behavior with aplomb. “When I see an adult male chasing a female with the intent to commit rape, I shoot the bastard. That’s my policy.”


New research shows that culture even affects our cognition. A study published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology claims that Americans and Japanese intuit the emotions of others differently based on cultural training. “North Americans try to identify the single important thing that is key to making a decision,” explains Dr. Takahiko Masuda, the study’s author, over the phone from his office at the University of Alberta. “In East Asia they really care about the context.” He studied the eye movement of Americans and Japanese when analyzing a picture of a group of cartoon people. When asked to interpret the emotion of the person in the center, the Japanese looked at the person for about one second before moving on to the people in the background. They needed to know how the group was feeling before understanding the emotion of the individual. The Americans (and Canadians in subsequent studies) focused 95% of their attention on the person in the center. Only 5% of their attention was focused on the background, and this, Dr. Masuda points out, didn’t influence their interpretation of the central figure’s emotion. For North Americans the foreground is all-important.

Dr. Masuda is quick to point out that Americans and Japanese are physiologically the same. The difference in eye movement is tied to the roots of our respective cultures. When trying to explain the natural world, the Ancient Greeks – the founders of Western civilization – tended to focus on central objects and sought to explain their rules of behavior. Funnily enough, Aristotle thought a rock had the property of “gravity.” It didn’t occur to him that a system was working its powers on the rock. The Chinese on the other hand took a more holistic approach. They believed that everything occurred within a context, or a field of forces, and thus they unraveled the relationship between the moon and the tides.

These differences in philosophy can be explained, at least in part, by the environments that spawned them. “We are surrounded by socially created information, which affects our perception,” Masuda explains. And perception affects our culture. Research shows that North American cities are less cluttered than East Asian cities, which means that North Americans can spend more time considering salient objects. When Americans or Canadians visit East Asia, they are often overwhelmed by the amount of information they have to process. I have experienced this phenomenon personally. The first time I bused from Incheon Airport into Seoul, South Korea, I was dumbfounded by the number of buildings, advertisements, lights, cars and people and had to turn away from the window to stop my head from spinning. Dr. Masuda first arrived in North America when he was 26. Compared to Japan, which was crowded with people and objects and “complex pieces of information,” he felt North American cities to be lonely places.

Masuda stresses that no way of perceiving the world is better than another and refuses to interpret his studies too broadly. He has yet to conduct his tests in Africa or South America. But it seems to me that Masuda’s study is important: It reminds us that there is more than one way of seeing the world.

North Americans have a tendency toward isolating singular goals and working doggedly towards them. And we have achieved some remarkable accomplishments. We put a man on the moon, invented the telephone and the airplane and achieved a thousand more seemingly impossible tasks. We congratulate ourselves on our individualism in our movies, our art, our personal relationships and, of course, our politics. But as we do so, we perpetuate this trait – perception informs culture, culture informs perception – until we mistake the way we see the world for the only way to see the world.

As alluring as the Dirty Harry approach may be, is it time to put away our Smith & Wesson and start considering the other customers in the diner? The problems we face today – the environmental degradation of our planet, global recession, religious fundamentalism – don’t fit inside borders or simple categories. Context is unavoidable. We need to start looking for it.

66 comments on the article “What Do You See?”

Displaying 31 - 40 of 66

Page 4 of 7

Reason Rebel

Turns out rugged individualism worked out damn well for all the old democracies, the US, Canada, Britain, Australia. Freeing the individual is what is best for the whole. We are our most creative, honest, and natural. Look at world trends and it is clear that it is the western society that is being adopted. Style and fashion are becomming prominent around the world (basic way of displaying individuality), migration trends towards the west not away form it. Western products, science, and knowledge spreads more and more. Why is it when we live on the hotbed of progression there are so many willing to dismiss our triumph.

Reason Rebel

Turns out rugged individualism worked out damn well for all the old democracies, the US, Canada, Britain, Australia. Freeing the individual is what is best for the whole. We are our most creative, honest, and natural. Look at world trends and it is clear that it is the western society that is being adopted. Style and fashion are becomming prominent around the world (basic way of displaying individuality), migration trends towards the west not away form it. Western products, science, and knowledge spreads more and more. Why is it when we live on the hotbed of progression there are so many willing to dismiss our triumph.

ken vallario

because, to answer your question, hubris is the inevitable result of announcing victory prior to enough evidence. the spread of an idea is not the measure of its worth, especially if the spread is connected to a military history that makes such sociological/cultural value judgments impossible.

what exactly is it that you think individuals should be freed from? Because when we cut off or relationship with one form of dependency we inevitably create another. in the words of a great philosopher 'freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose.' and many, under this progressive form of westernism are coming close to having nothing left to lose, and would prefer a sense of community over corporate freedom. and eastern forms of community are probably not the answer either, because, both the east and the west are illusory ideas, each with its own cultural products...if one was truly liberating, then you would not need a military to protect it.

ken vallario

because, to answer your question, hubris is the inevitable result of announcing victory prior to enough evidence. the spread of an idea is not the measure of its worth, especially if the spread is connected to a military history that makes such sociological/cultural value judgments impossible.

what exactly is it that you think individuals should be freed from? Because when we cut off or relationship with one form of dependency we inevitably create another. in the words of a great philosopher 'freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose.' and many, under this progressive form of westernism are coming close to having nothing left to lose, and would prefer a sense of community over corporate freedom. and eastern forms of community are probably not the answer either, because, both the east and the west are illusory ideas, each with its own cultural products...if one was truly liberating, then you would not need a military to protect it.

Anonymous

Orientalism hidden in pseudo-scientific conclusions and quotes from experts. Sorry, this is just regurgitation of fantasies about the "wisdom of the East." Critiquing and commenting upon your own ideology by projecting the ideal on the Other, but pop-science and good intentions doesn't make this any different from our Victorian forebears.

Saying that black people are good at sports isn't racist because it sounds positive, right?

I'd love to see Adbusters do a review of Avatar.

Anonymous

Orientalism hidden in pseudo-scientific conclusions and quotes from experts. Sorry, this is just regurgitation of fantasies about the "wisdom of the East." Critiquing and commenting upon your own ideology by projecting the ideal on the Other, but pop-science and good intentions doesn't make this any different from our Victorian forebears.

Saying that black people are good at sports isn't racist because it sounds positive, right?

I'd love to see Adbusters do a review of Avatar.

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.