Thought Control in Economics

The Delusion Revolution

The future we have been dreaming of is not based on reality.
The Delusion Revolution
Mike Mills, Let's Be Human Beings, 2003, Photo: Todd Cole

This article is available in:

Imagine you are riding comfortably on a sleek train. You look out the window and see that the tracks end abruptly not too far ahead ... The train will derail if it continues. You suggest the train stop immediately and the passengers go forward on foot. This will require a major shift in everyone’s way of traveling, of course, but you see it as the only realistic option. To continue barreling forward is to court catastrophic consequences. But when you propose this course of action, others – who have grown comfortable riding on the train – say, “We like the train, and arguing that we should get off is not realistic.”

In the contemporary United States, we are trapped in a similar delusion. We are told that it is “realistic” to yield to the absurd idea that the systems we live in are the only systems possible or acceptable based on the fact that some people like them and wish them to continue. But what if our current level of first world consumption is exhausting the ecological basis for life? Too bad. The only “realistic” options are those that view this lifestyle as nonnegotiable. What if real democracy is not possible in a nation-state with 300 million people? Too bad. The only “realistic” options are those that view this way of organizing a polity as immutable. What if the hierarchies our lives are based on are producing extreme material deprivation for the oppressed and dull misery among the privileged? Too bad. The only “realistic” options are those that view hierarchy as inevitable.

Let me offer a different view of reality:

(1) We live in a system that, taken as a whole, is unsustainable – not only over the long haul but in the short term.

(2) Unsustainable systems cannot be sustained.

How’s that for a profound theoretical insight? Unsustainable systems can’t be sustained. It’s hard to argue with that. The important question is whether or not we live in a system that is truly unsustainable. There’s no way to definitively prove such a sweeping statement, but look around at what we’ve built and ask yourself whether you really believe this world can go forward indefinitely … or even for more than a few decades. Take a minute to ponder the end of cheap fossil energy, the lack of viable large-scale replacements for that energy and the ecological consequences of burning what remains of it. Consider the indicators of the health of the planet: groundwater contamination, topsoil loss, levels of toxicity. Factor in the widening inequality in the world, the intensity of the violence and the desperation that so many feel at every level of society.

Based on what you know about these trends, do you think this is a sustainable system? If you were to let go of your attachment to this world, is there any way to imagine this as a sustainable system? Considering all the ways you understand the world, is there anything in your field of perception that tells you we’re on the right track?

The important question is whether or not we live in a system that is truly unsustainable.

To be radically realistic in the face of all this is to recognize the failure of basic systems and to abandon the notion that all we need to do is recalibrate the institutions that structure our lives. The old future – the way we thought things would work out – truly is gone. The nation-state and capitalism are at the core of this unsustainable system, giving rise to the high-energy/mass-consumption configuration of privileged societies that has left us saddled with what James Howard Kunstler calls “a living arrangement with no future.” The future we have been dreaming of is not based on reality. Most of the world’s population – who don’t live with our privilege – has no choice but to face this reality. It’s time for us to come to terms with it.

Robert Jensen is a journalism professor at the University of Texas at Austin. He is the author of Getting Off: Pornography and the End of Masculinity and All My Bones Shake: Seeking a Progressive Path to the Prophetic Voice.

150 comments on the article “The Delusion Revolution”

Displaying 111 - 120 of 150

Page 12 of 15

Anonymous

I love the cognitive dissonance that runs rampant within the Adbuster ranks. There is no confusion. The ONLY moderately stable manifestation of socialism is brutal totalitarianism. If you read, you know the scores of examples other than Russian Communism, most notably the Progressivist ideals of the Nazis (as in National SOCIALIST German Workers party?). It's the same story over and over...currently being played out by the moron Chavez. Reform constitution, undermine judiciary, take executive control over government coffers, take control of electoral agencies, take control of army, take outright control of judiciary, selectively suspend property and personal rights. FANTASTIC! If that's the road to socialist enlightenment then please put your vote (oh right, you don't really get one) where your mouth is and move down there? By the way I'm assuming you don't really know who Gheoring (sic) was. He was a Nazi. He's one of the grandfathers of your political movement. The Progressivist precursor to the Democrats were falling all over the Nazis and Mussolini - you know, until they started killing all the Jews and annexing countries at will (and actually for quite a while after that too). Why is it that you guys never see this stuff coming? Too busy "culture jamming," I suppose.

Anonymous

I love the cognitive dissonance that runs rampant within the Adbuster ranks. There is no confusion. The ONLY moderately stable manifestation of socialism is brutal totalitarianism. If you read, you know the scores of examples other than Russian Communism, most notably the Progressivist ideals of the Nazis (as in National SOCIALIST German Workers party?). It's the same story over and over...currently being played out by the moron Chavez. Reform constitution, undermine judiciary, take executive control over government coffers, take control of electoral agencies, take control of army, take outright control of judiciary, selectively suspend property and personal rights. FANTASTIC! If that's the road to socialist enlightenment then please put your vote (oh right, you don't really get one) where your mouth is and move down there? By the way I'm assuming you don't really know who Gheoring (sic) was. He was a Nazi. He's one of the grandfathers of your political movement. The Progressivist precursor to the Democrats were falling all over the Nazis and Mussolini - you know, until they started killing all the Jews and annexing countries at will (and actually for quite a while after that too). Why is it that you guys never see this stuff coming? Too busy "culture jamming," I suppose.

Anonymous

people flock to "our" shores because their countries have been systemically impoverished by the capitalist system, which requires developed and underdeveloped countries, while limiting the upward "advancement" of the latter. also, capitalist countries also have secret police etc... ie the CIA that do put down uprisings that challenge the regime of the free market, not only nationally, but internationally. socialism must not be only thought of as the USSR genre. like capitalism, socialism can be embodied in many ways. i think bolivia is a good example of a socialist system working well. and your comments on human nature are beyond cliche. the only thing humans do naturally is eating and having sex, so to say that humans are "naturally" individualists and self-interested beings is a lame excuse to justify the atrocities commited in the name of "the pursuit of happiness" under capitalist hegemony.

Anonymous

people flock to "our" shores because their countries have been systemically impoverished by the capitalist system, which requires developed and underdeveloped countries, while limiting the upward "advancement" of the latter. also, capitalist countries also have secret police etc... ie the CIA that do put down uprisings that challenge the regime of the free market, not only nationally, but internationally. socialism must not be only thought of as the USSR genre. like capitalism, socialism can be embodied in many ways. i think bolivia is a good example of a socialist system working well. and your comments on human nature are beyond cliche. the only thing humans do naturally is eating and having sex, so to say that humans are "naturally" individualists and self-interested beings is a lame excuse to justify the atrocities commited in the name of "the pursuit of happiness" under capitalist hegemony.

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.