Thawing from the Winter of our Discontent

Will we see a Global Spring?

The war in Syria is killing 200 people a day. There's been no single arrest or prosecution of any senior Wall Street banker for the systemic fraud that precipitated the 2008 financial crisis. Pussy Riot are still in jail. Two years after the fall of Mubarak, and the uprisings in Cairo have intensified, with severe rape and death tolls.

Were the protests of 2011 but an ephemeral wave of sound and fury, signifying, and amounting to nothing? Or did something real and substantial kick-off in 2011, something that in fact has not diminished at all – something that might be most appropriately labelled a "revolution"? Will we see a Global Spring?

Paul Mason believes there has been an irreversible "change in consciousness" evident in the widespread and palatable intimation that "something big is possible; that a great change in the world's priorities is within people's grasp." A disdain for corporate capitalism is now felt in the bellies of millions of people. The youth whose futures are barred, if not stolen, from them are full of resentment, though not an unproductive kind. But rather a resentment that is the embodiment of a moral nerve, an emotion that is fueled by a thirst for justice above all.

Sociologist Manuel Castells argues that the social, political and historical changes which crystallized in 2011 were irrevocable, like the advent of electricity, and they "will condition all politics going forward". As Mason writes for the Guardian, "people [now] have a better understanding of power . . . they are clever to the point of expertise in knowing how to mess up hierarchies and see the various 'revolutions' in their lives as part of an 'exodus' from oppression, not – as previous generations did – as a 'diversion into the personal'."

One of the most enthralling elements from the past few years of burgeoning global-revolutionary spirit has been the memes that surfaced and circulated through the realm of our collective digital consciousness.

As Mason states so eloquently:

From Tahrir to Puerta del Sol, the most important thing about the slogans, images and gestures is not what they said in isolation but what they expressed cumulatively . . .

These were first of all signifiers of rejection: scorn not just for the elite world of yachts, diamond watches and bodyguards, but for the everyday world of corporate conformity.

Through these signs and symbols, large parts of humanity were signalling their solidarity to one another; their belief that a kinder, more human system is possible; and that it would be born out of the chaotic, ironic, playful qualities of human life – not by pitting one cruel hierarchy against another. And this is why all exhortations to "formulate demands", embrace structure, or turn to "everyday life" miss the point: the activists' unwillingness to engage is precisely what has allowed them, up to now, to disrupt the timetable of official politics."

But so far no protest has attained its aims. Is the period of coups still yet to come as it was with the 1848-51 French revolution? Are we seeing the revenge of the dinosaur regimes – in Egypt and elsewhere? Is there not a widespread fear that fascism and militarism could revive and conquer near and far? We are stuck in a widespread stagnation, America is doing everything in its power to avoid the consequences of its economic-political crisis. But amidst all this, the rumbling continues.

"Something fundamental has happened," Mason affirms, there has been a "shift in human consciousness and behaviour [that is] as momentous as that [historical shift] triggered by the arrival of mass consumption and mass culture in the 1900s." Though, the barriers protestors face have never been more obvious, as Mason himself recognizes, "their 'revolution' remains trapped at the phase of ideology, culture, political debate." But a turning point lies within reach, just ahead.

To read more about why the global protest movement, based on social networks, is here to stay, read Mason's full article, here.

Adbusters 111 Cover

On Newsstands December 3

At last we’re in Winter. It’s the year 2047. A worn scrapbook from the future arrives in your lap. It offers a stunning global vision, a warning to the next generations, a repository of practical wisdom, and an invaluable roadmap which you need to navigate the dark times, and the opportunities, which lie ahead.

Subscribe to Adbusters Magazine

Comments on the article “Thawing from the Winter of our Discontent”

Displaying 1 - 6 of 6

Page 1 of 1

I don't know.

Men are incapable of sufficient empathy.
Women are incapable of building systems.
The man-woman relationship is strongest relationship.
It is both a system and empathy.


Interesting Comment. Is it that women are incapable or that they have not truly been given the opportunity? Do they not see the opportunity, until it presents itself?
Do the systems women build not get any credit because they are not particularly political?
Is it not that men are incapable of empathy, but that their empathy is protectionist. Furthermore, that the protectionist mentality in men has been exploited by political/military leaders for alterior motives?


> Women are incapable of building systems.

ahem .. women build, nurture and develop human beings - some might argue that a human being is a sophisticated system. In a natural society, women are the core of development of community - some might argue that a community is a sophisticated system.

I think the original phrase might have meant "Women are incapable of building simple, dead systems"

Robert Eggleton

The above comments are all off-topic. Rarity from the Hollow -- see how a little girl built a system that saved the universe and how a male dictator bent from empathy.


Did I read the same article? Where is this irrelevant, over-generalization coming from? Let's step out of the egocentricity of comparison. Please be aware, we are not separate.


Wait for it, waait forr it! Fear not reader, you're getting there, we're all getting there. We all have our own paths to higher consciousness. That's what the article was about. The moment we think we know, (and can put something so generally,) we're wrong. Ironic, the name you used was IDK ;) Have a good one!

Add a new comment

To comment or reply please Log In, Create An Account or post as Anonymous.