Art or Vandalism?

Parisian street artist Zevs arrested.

Renowned Parisian street artist Zevs was arrested in Hong Kong on Monday, July 13 following the symbolic defacing of a flagship Giorgio Armani boutique.

Zevs and two others were taken into custody after painting a gushing, liquidated Chanel logo across the building's façade. The guerrilla artwork, said to represent the war of brands, has yet again caused heated debate over the fine line between art and vandalism.

In a press release, Zevs said he has pleaded guilty to one count of criminal damage. In response, Armani is claiming HK$6,746,000 in damages ($860,000 in US dollars) to replace part of the building's sandstone exterior.

Zevs assures the dripping icon is far from permanent. The artist says he took special care to use children's washable paint, and that more delicate surfaces in places like Berlin, Paris and New York have come clean without issue.

Since the early 1990s, Zevs' influential graffiti has playfully attacked the world's most contemptible corporations. In addition to liquidating popular logos, he has been known to "kidnap" models from billboards and decorate filthy urban surfaces with pressurized water.

The prankster was arrested on the eve of his opening at the Art Statements Gallery in Hong Kong, where many of his iconic works are now on display. Zevs' sentence will be read on August 14. For the time being, a white plastic tarp covers the dissolving Chanel logo.

What part will you play in the war of brands?

Adbusters 111 Cover

On Newsstands December 3

At last we’re in Winter. It’s the year 2047. A worn scrapbook from the future arrives in your lap. It offers a stunning global vision, a warning to the next generations, a repository of practical wisdom, and an invaluable roadmap which you need to navigate the dark times, and the opportunities, which lie ahead.

Subscribe to Adbusters Magazine

38 comments on the article “Art or Vandalism?”

Displaying 11 - 20 of 38

Page 2 of 4

very dissapoint...

Why dont your explain the artstic beauty of this peice for us "who dont get it". Moron. This is vandalism. If this idot did that to your house or car you would be outraged. That specific building is very clean and sleek, has no outrageous billboards or jam packed with ads. How is it protesting clutter by painting shitty graffiti on a clean simple wall.

very dissapoint...

Why dont your explain the artstic beauty of this peice for us "who dont get it". Moron. This is vandalism. If this idot did that to your house or car you would be outraged. That specific building is very clean and sleek, has no outrageous billboards or jam packed with ads. How is it protesting clutter by painting shitty graffiti on a clean simple wall.

McAnonymous

...and you are likely a little girlish, leftist, douchebag with ne'er two brain cells to rub together who buys into this vacuous tripe, hook line and sinker.

McAnonymous

...and you are likely a little girlish, leftist, douchebag with ne'er two brain cells to rub together who buys into this vacuous tripe, hook line and sinker.

Anonymous

That's ridiculous. $860,000 US dollars?
This is a world for big business and, if you don't want to play the game, you're going to be locked up in prison or homeless.

Or forced to pay outlandish fines to feed the coffers of these plutocratic swine.

Anonymous

That's ridiculous. $860,000 US dollars?
This is a world for big business and, if you don't want to play the game, you're going to be locked up in prison or homeless.

Or forced to pay outlandish fines to feed the coffers of these plutocratic swine.

Anonymous

I just want to bring up the fact that Keith Harring started out the same way. If you dont know who he is, I'd suggest looking him up. He's a most interesting man. Anywhoo, I'd say that this is in fact both. And it could have been a it more creative.

Anonymous

I just want to bring up the fact that Keith Harring started out the same way. If you dont know who he is, I'd suggest looking him up. He's a most interesting man. Anywhoo, I'd say that this is in fact both. And it could have been a it more creative.

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.