Blackspot

The Unacknowledged Test

Those who understand experience in this second sense will grasp climate change as a perilous existential and civilizational trial.

Experts agree that we are experiencing perilous climate change that calls the fate of our experiment in civilization into question. As severe weather strikes one continent and mysterious die-offs occur in another, the death rattle of the natural environment grows louder. “Where have all the fireflies gone?” we wonder, and then the scientists confirm that they have noted their absence as well. Once the so-called experts step in and the media assures us that abnormal things are indeed happening, we suppress our alarm and resume sleepwalking through ironic consumption. Is this the only way we can experience climate change?

“Experience” is a word we use everyday so it should be easy to define what it means. Some would argue that to experience climate change is to acknowledge its existence. They see experience as living through an event, and they hope to weather what awaits by maintaining the lifestyle that brought us this historical, ecological moment. Those who treat an experience as something to be survived see climate change as something that can be dealt with using the tools of advanced technology, international diplomacy and public education campaigns. “We can get through this,” might be their admirable motto and most of our society could be counted as their supporters.

But “experience” has another meaning that we ought to consider. The words “experiment,” “expert” and “experience” are related: an expert is often someone who gains experience through experiments. The expert need not be a scientist; we also gain experience by submitting ourselves to life-experiments like outdoor adventures, risky activism or dangerous thinking. After one of these experiences, we've transformed ourselves and come closer to our full potential. Experience, it seems, has some connection to a test that puts our self into question.

It may not be a surprise to learn that the common root which “expert,” “experiment” and “experience” share is the Latin word experiri, which means “to put to the test.” In fact, we can go one step further and say that every experience is a dangerous test. I do not say this without cause but instead am referring back to the Latin root experiri, which comes from periculum meaning test, trial, risk, danger or, as it is commonly translated: peril. The other meaning of the word experience is thus to be in peril.

Those who understand experience in this second sense will grasp climate change as a perilous existential and civilizational trial. Nature, via climate change, is charging us with ecocide and we must respond if we want to avoid the death sentence. It is no defense to cling to life as it was before today in the hopes of surviving the weather of tomorrow – that is merely blind denial to the trial taking place.

Instead, we must put our selves, our minds, our souls and our way of life under review. We can respond to the charges brought against us only by renouncing the industrial, consumerist worldview that brought us to this catastrophic point. To experience climate change is to be called to take part in an experiment after which the world as we know it is forever changed.

Micah White is a contributing editor at Adbusters and an independent activist. He is writing a book on the future of activism. www.micahmwhite.com or micah (at) adbusters.org

Adbusters 111 Cover

On Newsstands December 3

At last we’re in Winter. It’s the year 2047. A worn scrapbook from the future arrives in your lap. It offers a stunning global vision, a warning to the next generations, a repository of practical wisdom, and an invaluable roadmap which you need to navigate the dark times, and the opportunities, which lie ahead.

Subscribe to Adbusters Magazine

28 comments on the article “The Unacknowledged Test”

Displaying 11 - 20 of 28

Page 2 of 3

McAnonymous

While you're "busying" yourself with etymology trivialities - mother Gaia is busily turning each of the leftist-alarmist climate theories right on their head! Doesn't she know that nature should be obeying the models? Antarctic ice extent at all-time record levels; snowfall records toppling routinely; Arctic ice steadily increasing - basically a cooling world for the past decade. "Nature is charging us with Ecocide." ??? Very dramatic - when all we really need right now at this "tipping point" is a little actual science.
Small (but pivotal) question. If the science is so locked away, why then do "Jones and Wigley" not release their data for scientific scrutiny. Their temperature time series is what underpins the whole IPCC circus - so why are repeated attempts to obtain this data holy grail rebuffed? THAT is simply how "science" works - THAT is the basis of "peer reviewed" studies. Hmm...

McAnonymous

While you're "busying" yourself with etymology trivialities - mother Gaia is busily turning each of the leftist-alarmist climate theories right on their head! Doesn't she know that nature should be obeying the models? Antarctic ice extent at all-time record levels; snowfall records toppling routinely; Arctic ice steadily increasing - basically a cooling world for the past decade. "Nature is charging us with Ecocide." ??? Very dramatic - when all we really need right now at this "tipping point" is a little actual science.
Small (but pivotal) question. If the science is so locked away, why then do "Jones and Wigley" not release their data for scientific scrutiny. Their temperature time series is what underpins the whole IPCC circus - so why are repeated attempts to obtain this data holy grail rebuffed? THAT is simply how "science" works - THAT is the basis of "peer reviewed" studies. Hmm...

Anonymous

C'mon you can't be serious. Lovelock? Surely you can't believe his crackpot doomsday predictions!? Not ONE of these kind of "scientific prophets" has had a correct prediction - ever - and yet people still listen to them. Something about blind leading blind comes to mind.
This is the fourth armageddon we're on this century - 1920's pending ice age; 1930's pending global warming; 1970's pending ice age; 1990's pending global warming AGAIN? Humans are so easily duped by "scientists" with flashy, shiny predictions.

Anonymous

C'mon you can't be serious. Lovelock? Surely you can't believe his crackpot doomsday predictions!? Not ONE of these kind of "scientific prophets" has had a correct prediction - ever - and yet people still listen to them. Something about blind leading blind comes to mind.
This is the fourth armageddon we're on this century - 1920's pending ice age; 1930's pending global warming; 1970's pending ice age; 1990's pending global warming AGAIN? Humans are so easily duped by "scientists" with flashy, shiny predictions.

Anonymous

I think experience is not required to save climate and environment.We have to strategically plan our resources and means to save the environment from destruction.

Anonymous

I think experience is not required to save climate and environment.We have to strategically plan our resources and means to save the environment from destruction.

philippe bodart...

I think experience is not required to save climate and environment.We have to strategically plan our resources and means to save the environment from destruction.

philippe bodart...

I think experience is not required to save climate and environment.We have to strategically plan our resources and means to save the environment from destruction.

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.