Blackspot

Post-Consensus Politics

Moving beyond the elusive 51%.

Culture jammers face a powerful, monied, entrenched enemy that controls the media, the judiciary, the military and the halls of government. With a grip on every level of power, from city councils to the supreme court, and exclusive control over the public airwaves and the internet, the consumerists have a unparalleled propaganda apparatus. Thus, we live in a world where the majority sincerely agrees with their own enslavement. Consensus is owned by the corporations. How, despite all this, can a small number of jammers pull off a revolution against consumerism?

The obvious answer is that we ought to struggle to regain the majority's favor. The reasoning for this approach is that we must first build up a powerful consensus before we can have the legitimacy to make radical social changes. This is a commonsensical democratic idea that motivates most political activism today. The assumption is that democratic change can occur only when one has a majority of the vote, a view the corporatist-majority promulgates because it legitimates their grip on power. In this model, the solution to every social problem begins with canvassing for donations and ends at the ballot box.

The radical left has hitherto been paralyzed by the dream of achieving a consensus that legitimates its dreams of power. Confined within the logic of corporatist parliamentary politics, activists have dissipated their energy in chasing after the mythical fifty-one percent of the vote or the polls. Consider, for example, the process by which political platforms are drafted today. Each radical proposal, from the Tobin Tax to True Cost Economics, is submitted to the question of whether fifty-one percent of the population would support it at the ballot box. If the answer is no, then the proposal, no matter how righteous, is abandoned. The name of the game is compromise and majoritarian politics.

In recent years, particularly following the failure of the global antiwar protests to change the drift of history, the flaw of the consensus-chasing model has become clear. After all, once we accept the assumption that democratic change can only occur when the majority is on our side, politics devolves into a game where truth is superseded by the power of opinion. With focus grouped messaging, political advertising and branding messiahs dictating the path to swaying mainstream doxa, we give capitalism the power to pick the winner of every contest.

On the contrary, the challenge for culture jammers today is to conceive of how a minority, without dreams of achieving fifty-one percent of public opinion, can enact significant, long-lasting, radial social change.

Post-consensus politics means freeing ourselves from the delusion that the majority will be convinced prior to the revolution. It means abandoning the resource-intensive tactics of watering down our message for mass public consumption. And it demands we contemplate instead how a small cadre of fired-up jammers with limited resources can destabilize the consumerist regime.

Micah White

Adbusters 111 Cover

On Newsstands December 3

At last we’re in Winter. It’s the year 2047. A worn scrapbook from the future arrives in your lap. It offers a stunning global vision, a warning to the next generations, a repository of practical wisdom, and an invaluable roadmap which you need to navigate the dark times, and the opportunities, which lie ahead.

Subscribe to Adbusters Magazine

Comments on the article “Post-Consensus Politics”

Displaying 11 - 14 of 14

Page 2 of 2

Anonymous

Guise, does this mean that we have to build the Leninist party nao? I mean, that is one historical answer to the question posed by the idea of post-parliamentarian politics... At any rate, I call dibs on either the cult of personality or the Custeristic yet romantic Red Army Faction style death.

Anonymous

Guise, does this mean that we have to build the Leninist party nao? I mean, that is one historical answer to the question posed by the idea of post-parliamentarian politics... At any rate, I call dibs on either the cult of personality or the Custeristic yet romantic Red Army Faction style death.

Anonymous

I think the time for action has NOT come, it has passed. Certainly not everywhere, there are countries across the world where there remains hope for the widespread acceptance of humanism in the face of consumerism, but not here is the USA. The era of real solutions died with RFK, MLK, JFK and Malcolm, among thousands of others. At this point, with the clear embrace of plutocracy by BOTH Obama and the Democrats (taxing the richest Americans even less than G.W. Bush, no environmental action, corporate handouts, war, etc...) and the ignorant corporate shoe shiners of the Tea Party GOP. At this point the best move for us to make is to cease all resistance- let the consumerist plutocratic society run wild, let it burn itself to the ground, then get out there and rebuild. What else can be done against the forces we're up against? Realistically, nothing.

Anonymous

I think the time for action has NOT come, it has passed. Certainly not everywhere, there are countries across the world where there remains hope for the widespread acceptance of humanism in the face of consumerism, but not here is the USA. The era of real solutions died with RFK, MLK, JFK and Malcolm, among thousands of others. At this point, with the clear embrace of plutocracy by BOTH Obama and the Democrats (taxing the richest Americans even less than G.W. Bush, no environmental action, corporate handouts, war, etc...) and the ignorant corporate shoe shiners of the Tea Party GOP. At this point the best move for us to make is to cease all resistance- let the consumerist plutocratic society run wild, let it burn itself to the ground, then get out there and rebuild. What else can be done against the forces we're up against? Realistically, nothing.

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.