Blackspot

Insurrection Debated

Insurrection or revolution?

A debate whose outcome may have profound significance for activism is simmering at the edges of the Left. What makes this a squabble worth attending to is that both sides seem equally matched: their theorists are brilliant, their proponents are passionate and their networks are distributed. And at the center of the debate is a question of vital importance: insurrection or revolution.

Insurrectionary anarchism is rarely talked about because it pushes the boundaries of political good taste. The few authors who do openly promote the movement are often jailed. In 1977, for example, Alfredo M. Bonanno was imprisoned for 18 months in Italy for writing Armed Joy. Thus insurrectionary anarchism has traditionally been pushed to the margins of political debate and ignored … until now.

Most of us are aware of the revolutionary model that relies on a mass movement of disaffected people storming the gates of power and seizing control in an organized manner. This revolutionary model exists in opposition to the chaotic, spontaneous and violent impulse underlying insurrectionary anarchism. And usually, the debate is over before it begins and revolutionary praxis wins by default.

But with the publication of The Coming Insurrection and the arrest of the alleged author of the text insurrectionary anarchism is picking up a readership. Some 27,000 copies have been sold in France and more are being purchased every day through Amazon in the States. It has even inspired additional tracts such as Preoccupied: The Logic of Occupation. With insurrectionary anarchism finally reaching a wide audience, a debate among radical political theorists was inevitable.

The first signs of this discussion can be found on Znet in a blog entitled, “The Coming Insurrection or the Arrival of Suicidal Nonsense?” by Chris Spannos. Although Spannos disagrees with the authors of the text, his post is commendable for being one of the first to take it seriously enough to argue with on a philosophical basis. I expect that we will see a growing number of thinkers weigh in on the question of how to carry out the overthrow.

I believe the debate over the merits of The Coming Insurrection can only lead us in the right direction because the question it raises – how to bring about vast, systemic change – is the single most important question we ought to be considering. So, download a copy of The Coming Insurrection, read Spannos' critique and weigh in below with your thoughts.

Micah White is a Contributing Editor at Adbusters and an independent activist. He is writing a book on the future of activism. www.micahmwhite.com or micah (at) adbusters.org

Adbusters 111 Cover

On Newsstands December 3

At last we’re in Winter. It’s the year 2047. A worn scrapbook from the future arrives in your lap. It offers a stunning global vision, a warning to the next generations, a repository of practical wisdom, and an invaluable roadmap which you need to navigate the dark times, and the opportunities, which lie ahead.

Subscribe to Adbusters Magazine

52 comments on the article “Insurrection Debated”

Displaying 21 - 30 of 52

Page 3 of 6

CourtneyAthena

Oh let me in!

I hope you're right bro. There need to be more confident thinkers like you. Thank you.

CourtneyAthena

Oh let me in!

I hope you're right bro. There need to be more confident thinkers like you. Thank you.

Anonymous

Why not walk through the front door with ideas for change, baby boomers are on there way out. Instead of burning down the back door with a disdain for the common cheeseburger eater, or whatever passive aggressive label of the day is for the average consumer. So we overthrow the old system and then what ? What common goal or vision does our generation have? Instead of creating a gap why not fill in glaring holes we see on a daily basis first

Anonymous

Why not walk through the front door with ideas for change, baby boomers are on there way out. Instead of burning down the back door with a disdain for the common cheeseburger eater, or whatever passive aggressive label of the day is for the average consumer. So we overthrow the old system and then what ? What common goal or vision does our generation have? Instead of creating a gap why not fill in glaring holes we see on a daily basis first

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.