Adbusters

Politics For Sale

After the iconic success of his Obama poster, Shepard Fairey continues to do what he does best: selling out.

I've never been a fan of Shepard Fairey's work. Far from the rebellious, meta-critique of consumer culture that it is purported to be, Fairey's art strikes me as contrived, unoriginal and uninspiring. But when Fairey created the now iconic image of Obama for his presidential campaign, I was forced to briefly reconsider my opinion of him as an artist. Now, just days after the inauguration, as the country basks in the light of cultural transcendence, Fairey is exploiting whatever political cachet he may have built with the Obama poster for the purpose of championing mindless consumerism.

Now I remember why I don't like his work.

Fairey has partnered with Saks Fifth Avenue to create a Constructivist-inspired marketing campaign for the high-end retailer's Spring season. Appropriating the style of one of his favorite go-to artists, Alexander Rodchenko, Fairey is doing what he does best – recycling politically-charged imagery in a way that is completely devoid of meaning. Borrowing from the aesthetic of 20th century workers' rights movements, Fairey's designs depict models with raised fists "arming themselves" with designer handbags. "Want It!" scream shopping bags in the same bold, graphic style that artists emerging from the Russian Revolution used to encourage the overthrow of the old social order.

"Some people might think [this campaign] could be making fun of what's going on right now," Fairey told the New York Times. "But I think most people are sophisticated enough to realize it's a way of grabbing attention. It's commerce. I don't think there is really any political statement embedded in this." What Fairey is either unable or unwilling to acknowledge is that the overtly political feel of the Saks campaign serves to mock and undercut the genuine desire for change inspired by the Obama campaign.

In urging a newly introspective populace to WANT, to NEED and to BUY, Fairey is helping to promote the same bullshit mindset that got us into our current mess – the very thing that we finally have a real opportunity to overthrow. He couldn't have chosen a more cynical project.

Adbusters 111 Cover

On Newsstands December 3

At last we’re in Winter. It’s the year 2047. A worn scrapbook from the future arrives in your lap. It offers a stunning global vision, a warning to the next generations, a repository of practical wisdom, and an invaluable roadmap which you need to navigate the dark times, and the opportunities, which lie ahead.

Subscribe to Adbusters Magazine

50 comments on the article “Politics For Sale”

Displaying 1 - 10 of 50

Page 1 of 5

yelahneb

Sarah: I hear what you're saying. I think there's a value in separating the art from the artist before a final judgment. A lot of people hated Andy Warhol for some of the same reasons, while his fans defend(ed) him by arguing that he was mocking the system by joining it - that he was vindicated by somehow being "in on the joke". I don't know if Shepard Fairey can be offered the same defense or stature - but I think the debate around his "authenticity" is a subjective one. Artists strive to make an impact, to generate a response from their viewer - regardless of whether or not it earns them any dough, it inevitably represents who they are and what they want to say to the world. We perpetuate Fairey's success, however deserved or undeserved, the moment we respond with a judgment; either way, we've fallen for the "joke", and the game continues.

yelahneb

Sarah: I hear what you're saying. I think there's a value in separating the art from the artist before a final judgment. A lot of people hated Andy Warhol for some of the same reasons, while his fans defend(ed) him by arguing that he was mocking the system by joining it - that he was vindicated by somehow being "in on the joke". I don't know if Shepard Fairey can be offered the same defense or stature - but I think the debate around his "authenticity" is a subjective one. Artists strive to make an impact, to generate a response from their viewer - regardless of whether or not it earns them any dough, it inevitably represents who they are and what they want to say to the world. We perpetuate Fairey's success, however deserved or undeserved, the moment we respond with a judgment; either way, we've fallen for the "joke", and the game continues.

Anonymous

Damn. Now spectacular society is detourning our images! Not to mention recuperating laughable images of the Old Left. Time for another war on images. Another war against the Hyperreal.

Anonymous

Damn. Now spectacular society is detourning our images! Not to mention recuperating laughable images of the Old Left. Time for another war on images. Another war against the Hyperreal.

Paula

Adbusters, you're pretty much doing the same thing as this guy Fairey...you talk about re-thinking capitalism, but you're still selling your magazine. Fairey at least recognizes his fault,but you keep selling the idea of "change" by means of profit. It's understandable you have employees, but isn't Adbusters a magazine of "the mental environment"?

Paula

Adbusters, you're pretty much doing the same thing as this guy Fairey...you talk about re-thinking capitalism, but you're still selling your magazine. Fairey at least recognizes his fault,but you keep selling the idea of "change" by means of profit. It's understandable you have employees, but isn't Adbusters a magazine of "the mental environment"?

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.