American Autumn

Panache!

Why we must fight.
Chris Hedges: Why we must fight!

AP Photo/The Times-Picayune, Matthew Hinton

Audio version read by George Atherton – Right-click to download

This article is available in:

My three-year-old son’s favorite book is Out of the Blue. It has large color photographs of sea animals, from plankton to clownfish to orcas. I often find my son, dressed in his pajamas, on the floor of his bedroom in the morning carefully turning the pages of the book. And every time I hear him naming out the magnificent creatures before him, my heart breaks. Within my son’s lifetime, if there is not a radical reversal in human behavior, the oceans of the world, and the life systems they support, will die.

I fight for my children. It is not about me. It is about them. The deep despair I feel over our collective inability to acknowledge, much less confront, the catastrophic dislocations ahead of us is offset by a fierce desire as a father to make sure I have summoned all my energy and resilience to defy the corporate systems of death that are exploiting human beings and the natural world until their exhaustion or collapse. At least, I hope, my children will look back and see that their father did not remain passive as the ecosystem was destroyed in the name of profit, and the world was reconfigured by corporations into a terrifying neofeudalism, a kind of totalitarian capitalism. At least they will see, I hope, pictures of their father being hauled off to jail in defiance. I resist not out of hate but out of love, a love for all the things the deformed culture of corporate profit finds meaningless and sentimental – children, lakes, mountains, trees and the song of a wood thrush deep in the forest.

The consequences of severe climate change are unavoidable. The freak weather patterns, the wild fires and tornadoes sweeping across Midwestern states, along with the droughts and severe flooding in China, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Australia, along with the soaring temperatures across the Earth, are upon us. And this is only the start. But what is most frightening is that the rapid and terrifying acceleration of global warming, which is disfiguring the ecosystem at a swifter pace than even the gloomiest scientific studies predicted a few years ago, have been met with collective denial and self-delusion. Global temperatures have already gone up one degree and begun the rapid melting of the Arctic. Every rise of one degree Celsius means a ten percent reduction in grain yields. If we stopped all carbon emissions today temperatures would continue to rise by at least a degree, perhaps more. A sudden epiphany would not save us from drastic climate change, large scale human migrations, rising sea levels, famine and endemic food shortages. Welcome to our brave new world.

The only viable option to save the human species from self-immolation – ending our dependence on fossil fuels – is ignored by the industrialized world’s power brokers, who have shredded the tepid climate agreement made at Kyoto. The last thin hope for reform and reversal will come through sustained acts of civil disobedience and open defiance of the formal systems of power. It means getting arrested. This is the conclusion drawn by many of our most prescient and important voices, including Wendell Berry and Bill McKibben.

Working within the system to reform it has failed. Working outside the system to defy it may also fail. Let’s be honest about this. The corporate structures of power are indifferent to the needs, rights or desires of the ordinary citizen – not to mention the planet – and have hijacked all systems of power from mass communications to electoral politics to the courts.

It is understandable that a realist would despair. And if I was to retreat into self-absorption I would find a small plot of land where I would never have to hear another leaf blower, and find what comfort I could in my family, my books and the whispers and beauty of the natural world. But to give up is not morally permissible. It is to condemn, as Sitting Bull reminded us, the born and the unborn, as well as the flora and fauna, which Sitting Bull also considered sacred, to misery and death. We have no right to do that. We must stand and fight for life.

We must fight for those who come after us, for those who at this moment are too small, too weak and too disempowered to fight, for the born and the unborn, for those who, like my son, have not yet lost the capacity for wonder and awe before the natural world. We owe our children that. The hardest moral stance and the greatest act of courage will be to see clearly, like Sitting Bull, the darkness and the power of the forces of death arrayed against us and yet find the fortitude to resist. Sitting Bull’s greatest fear at the end of his life was that he had not fought hard enough for his people and that they might revile him.

Resistance preserves our personal dignity as autonomous human beings. It means we have not allowed ourselves to be classified as objects. It is a way to defy our obscurity. Life is short. We all die. Nearly all battles for justice will long outlive us. I find my solace in faith. It is not the faith of any orthodox creed or religion but the faith that we are called to do the good, or at least the good in so far as we can best determine it, and then to let it go. We do not know where this good goes or if it goes anywhere. The Buddhists call this good karma. But faith means that acts of resistance – for true spirituality is always about resistance – are never meaningless, although all tangible signs may point toward failure and defeat. This faith gives me great comfort.

It is the faith that Cyrano de Bergerac expressed as he lashed out in his final battle, a battle he knew he could not win. Mortally wounded and facing Death, he suddenly rises. “Not here! Not lying down!”

His friends spring forward to help him. “Let no one help me,” he tells them as he props himself against a tree. “Only the tree … Let the old fellow come now! He shall find me on my feet, sword in hand … ”

“What’s that you say?” Cyrano calls out to the darkness. “Hopeless? Why, very well! But a man does not fight merely to win! No! No, better to know one fights in vain! … You there, who are you? A hundred against one. I know them now, my ancient enemies: Falsehood! There! There! Prejudice, Compromise, Cowardice!”

He swings with his sword. “What’s that? No! Surrender? No! Never, never! Ah, you too, Vanity! I knew you would overthrow me in the end. No! I fight on! I fight on! I fight on!”

He stops, breathless and dying. “Yes, all my laurels you have riven away And all my roses; yet in spite of you, There is one crown I bear away with me, And tonight, when I enter before God, My salute shall sweep all the stars away From the blue threshold! One thing without stain, unspotted from the world, in spite of doom. Mine own!”

He springs forward, his sword aloft.

“And that is … ”

The sword falls from his hands. He totters and falls into the arms of Roxane and his friends.

“That is … my panache.”

Chris Hedges is married to Canadian actress Eunice Wong They live with their children in Princeton, New Jersey. Hedges’ latest book is a collection of his essays called The World As It Is: Dispatches on the Myth of Human Progress.

278 comments on the article “Panache!”

Displaying 21 - 30 of 278

Page 3 of 28

Anonymous

"One thing we would differ on would be the definition of a parasite. I believe the real parasites in society are the ones who don't work yet want everyone who does work to support them."

I agree with this. The things we all differ on is our general assessment of all the voices. Everyone gets lumped in together and yeah, its easy to categorize the movements as just a bunch of entitled delusional hippies. some are.

"That's where your group would come in. Why don't all of you just be a little more honest and admit that it angers you to see someone successful because it serves as a shining example of everything your not. In your embittered minds, people of wealth didn't work hard for what they have, it was either given to them or they exploited or cheated someone for it."

everyone should be angry about dishonest earnings, and I think the definitions of what are 'honest earnings' could use further analysis. no one should however think a free ride is possible. all citizens must contribute

"As I've posted before if you don't like it here LEAVE. There's always Canada and this little island 90 miles off the tip of Florida. Of course there your idiotic protesting would land you in a detention camp. Enjoy your time in the spotlight, it will be short lived and soon you'll drift off into the land of the irrelevant"

again, argue with reason and equal humanity. adding vitriol and bothering with gross stereotypes, just detracts from what issues should really be focused on, and what issues are just stereotypes and character flaws.

Anonymous

"One thing we would differ on would be the definition of a parasite. I believe the real parasites in society are the ones who don't work yet want everyone who does work to support them."

I agree with this. The things we all differ on is our general assessment of all the voices. Everyone gets lumped in together and yeah, its easy to categorize the movements as just a bunch of entitled delusional hippies. some are.

"That's where your group would come in. Why don't all of you just be a little more honest and admit that it angers you to see someone successful because it serves as a shining example of everything your not. In your embittered minds, people of wealth didn't work hard for what they have, it was either given to them or they exploited or cheated someone for it."

everyone should be angry about dishonest earnings, and I think the definitions of what are 'honest earnings' could use further analysis. no one should however think a free ride is possible. all citizens must contribute

"As I've posted before if you don't like it here LEAVE. There's always Canada and this little island 90 miles off the tip of Florida. Of course there your idiotic protesting would land you in a detention camp. Enjoy your time in the spotlight, it will be short lived and soon you'll drift off into the land of the irrelevant"

again, argue with reason and equal humanity. adding vitriol and bothering with gross stereotypes, just detracts from what issues should really be focused on, and what issues are just stereotypes and character flaws.

Anonymous

The entitled delusional hippies have become the voice of your movement. I purchased my home with the understanding that I would pay back the bank in return for the property. Had I attended a four year university and needed a student loan, I would have understood that I needed to pay back this loan. No one put a gun to my head and forced me to buy my home, just as no one put a gun to the head of these deluded students. They moan and cry and take to the streets to demand change. However, this is the United States of America, not Egypt or Libya. The simple fact of the matter is that change in this country is effected at the ballot box. If this is such a popular movement then put your candidiate forward and convince the working people of this country on why he or she deserves their votes. But you and I both know your candidate would never win because it is not a popular movement. Honest working people on either the right or the left resent having more of their hard earned wages taken away to be redistributed to a bunch of whiners who have made bad decisions in their life. I'm sure in the end most in your movement will sell out and align themselves with the Democratic party. As for me, I'll keep my money, my expensive cars and my beautiful wife and daughters and continue to enjoy life.

Anonymous

The entitled delusional hippies have become the voice of your movement. I purchased my home with the understanding that I would pay back the bank in return for the property. Had I attended a four year university and needed a student loan, I would have understood that I needed to pay back this loan. No one put a gun to my head and forced me to buy my home, just as no one put a gun to the head of these deluded students. They moan and cry and take to the streets to demand change. However, this is the United States of America, not Egypt or Libya. The simple fact of the matter is that change in this country is effected at the ballot box. If this is such a popular movement then put your candidiate forward and convince the working people of this country on why he or she deserves their votes. But you and I both know your candidate would never win because it is not a popular movement. Honest working people on either the right or the left resent having more of their hard earned wages taken away to be redistributed to a bunch of whiners who have made bad decisions in their life. I'm sure in the end most in your movement will sell out and align themselves with the Democratic party. As for me, I'll keep my money, my expensive cars and my beautiful wife and daughters and continue to enjoy life.

Anonymous

there's just one problem with that. you see, if we're going to live in a "civilized" society, we need to take care of each other. if we're going to live as "animals", as in "survival of the fittest", then... can't we expect the "weakest" to also act like "animals" and do whatever is necessary to survive, even steal or kill? surely you can't expect them to just lay down and die in the streets. if we don't want the "losers" to act as "animals" and steal, or riot, or anything which the "winners" have deemed "uncivilized", then the "winners" need to act "civilized" as well and stop touting that "survival of the fittest", "I won, you lost, get over it" nonsense. the rules must be the same for everyone. don't you think?
so... what do we want? a civilized society or anarchy? we can't have it both ways. we're either ALL civilized or ALL animals. "humans hunting humans - deal with it"? seems to me like the protesters are dealing with it. now it's time to "deal with them". that seems fair to me.

Anonymous

there's just one problem with that. you see, if we're going to live in a "civilized" society, we need to take care of each other. if we're going to live as "animals", as in "survival of the fittest", then... can't we expect the "weakest" to also act like "animals" and do whatever is necessary to survive, even steal or kill? surely you can't expect them to just lay down and die in the streets. if we don't want the "losers" to act as "animals" and steal, or riot, or anything which the "winners" have deemed "uncivilized", then the "winners" need to act "civilized" as well and stop touting that "survival of the fittest", "I won, you lost, get over it" nonsense. the rules must be the same for everyone. don't you think?
so... what do we want? a civilized society or anarchy? we can't have it both ways. we're either ALL civilized or ALL animals. "humans hunting humans - deal with it"? seems to me like the protesters are dealing with it. now it's time to "deal with them". that seems fair to me.

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.