Post Anarchism - #OCCUPYWALLSTREET

Systematically Biased Reporting

On Israel, the New York Times is perniciously one-sided.

You are missing some Flash content that should appear here! Perhaps your browser cannot display it, or maybe it did not initialize correctly.

Audio version read by George Atherton – Right-click to download

Although the spin is hard to detect for the average reader, New York Times reportage of Middle East affairs is perniciously biased. In their seminal book, Israel-Palestine on Record: How the New York Times Misreports Conflict in the Middle East, Princeton professor Richard Falk and media critic Howard Friel argue that “the Times regularly ignores or under-reports a multitude of critical legal issues pertaining to Israel’s policies, including Israel’s expropriation and settlement of Palestinian land, the two-tier system of laws based on national origin evocative of South Africa’s apartheid regime, the demolition of Palestinian homes, and use of deadly force against Palestinians.” In other words, what is not said by the New York Times may be even more important than what is said.

In June of 2010, a year and a half after the Israeli military launched what a United Nations investigation described as “a deliberately disproportionate attack designed to punish, humiliate and terrorize a civilian population,” the New York Times sent a photographer into Gaza to capture a slice of daily life. Ethan Bronner, the Times Jerusalem bureau chief, wrote the narrative for the photo essay entitled “Gaza, Through Fresh Eyes,” in which he gushes about “jazzy cellphone stores and pricey restaurants … endless beaches with children whooping it up … the staggering quality of the very ordinary.” Seemingly lifted from an apolitical travel magazine, Bronner’s article merely alludes to families who have been “traumatized,” and omits any mention of the UN allegations of recently committed Israeli war crimes and human rights violations. Other than an oblique reference to “destroyed buildings” and “rubble,” Bronner’s travelogue also elides the vast civilian infrastructure Israel destroyed during the onslaught, including chicken farms, a flour mill, a sewage treatment plant, a UN school, vast tracts of civilian housing, government buildings, a prison, police stations, TV stations, newspapers ... and between 600 and 700 factories, workshops and businesses. The impression left by Bronner? Gaza is an OK place; nothing remarkable to see there, least of all evidence of Israeli war crimes; move along, move along.

And yet, what is not disclosed is that Ethan Bronner is married to an Israeli citizen and has a son who is enlisted in the Israeli army. When news of these familial connections broke, Times public editor Clark Hoyt wrote an op-ed recommending that Bronner be reassigned to avoid any potential for bias. Executive editor Bill Keller refused, waiving the Times’s normally strict conflict of interest standards.

Times reporter Isabel Kershner is similarly compromised by elisions and distortions. When Kershner reported on Palestinian refugees in Syria who, in June 2011, nonviolently marched into the Golan Heights to protest, she failed to mention that the Golan Heights is Syrian territory illegally occupied by Israel. No government in the world recognizes the Golan Heights as legitimately part of the state of Israel. Kershner also omits the fact that the Palestinian refugees’ right of return to their homes is enshrined in UN resolutions and that Israel has consistently violated international law in preventing the refugees from returning to their homes. Let us also not forget that at this nonviolent protest the Israeli army killed 22 Palestinian and Syrian protesters. In addressing the apparently overwhelming violence against unarmed protesters, Kershner reports: “Israeli officials say they tried every nonlethal method of crowd control at their disposal” before they opened fire “at the feet of the protesters,” implying that the killings were unintentional, and unavoidable, and defied the laws of physics. Kershner quotes none of the protesters as to what they saw. If she had, she may have heard what activist and eyewitness Salman Fakhreddin told independent journalist Jillian Kestler-D’Amours: “Israel decided to kill people in order to frighten them because Israel is afraid of the delegitimization of the state of Israel and Israeli policy in the international community.” By now it may not be a surprise to learn that Kershner is an Israeli citizen who is married to an Israeli citizen and who spent “a couple decades in Israeli journalism and Jewish education” before joining the American paper in 2007.

In large part because of Ethan Bronner and Isabel Kershner’s ahistorical, context-free, reporting-in-a-vacuum, the New York Times is to blame for what Adbusters has previously called “the United States of Amnesia.” American citizens are left unaware of Israel’s current and historical violations of international law and are thus unable to question their government’s multibillion dollar military giveaways to Israel, a state that just happens to be these two reporters’ adopted home.

Send a letter to the Times letters editor Thomas Feyer at [email protected] or tweet him @tomfeyer.

Last year, Matthew Taylor, a writer and activist, disrupted a speech by Prime Minister Netanyahu with chants of “the occupation delegitimizes Israel.” Matthew can be contacted at matthewtaylor.net

Support + Share

Help us spread the word. Share it online with your friends or subscribe to the print edition.

All Comments

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I don't disagree with

by Leo Glickman on September 06 2011, @02:22 pm

I don't disagree with anything in this article. Nor do I disagree with most articles appearing in Adbusters about Israel (I'm a long time subscriber).

I do think Adbusters gets it wrong when it ignores spontaneous protests and revolutions in the Arab world against oppressive leaders. Qadaffi, Mubarak, Assad, the Saudi royals -- to name but a few -- are oppressors of individual freedom, something we Adbusters readers thrive on, and violators of human rights. Yet I can't think of an article about that.

I don't get why the Adbusters community is not rallying around rebel fighters in Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Syria, Yemen, Bahrain and protesters in Saudi and finding ways to effectively assist. I don't understand why Adbusters apparently believes that being just as honest about the Arab/Muslim middle east, which in terms of governance and individual freedoms would be the laughing stock of the world if it weren't so tragic, as it is about Israel would somehow undermine the Israel message.

That Adbusters doesn't see the irony in the very excellent article they've published is surprising.

Take a look at Prof Walt's

by Anonymous on September 05 2011, @11:21 am

Take a look at Prof Walt's site and the study by the Center for American Progress named Fear Inc., The Roots of Islamophobia in America. It details how specific right'wing foundations have spent millions of USD to artifically and consciously foster hate toward a group. http://foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/08/26

And NYT. Lest we forget, that newspaper was especially involved in drumming up pro-Iraq War sentiments, to the extent of hiring Judith Miller to make up stories and various retired military "experts" planted and paid for the by US Dept. of Defense to flog the war, and whose columns the NYT printed under the guise of independent analysts.

You allege bias at the New

by Anonymous on September 01 2011, @08:59 pm

You allege bias at the New York Times but accept the word of Richard Falk who has never written a positive word about Israel. Israel should negotiate a two-state agreement and vacate the settlements, but the Arab Spring has made it clear that the Arab governments are the greatest oppressors of Arab people. In Syria, Egypt, Libya, Bahrain, Yemen et al, more Arab people have been killed by their governments this year than by Israel during any 10-year period.

Sweet cheeks, there IS

by Anonymous on September 05 2011, @11:23 am

Sweet cheeks, there IS nothing positive to say about the murderous, apartheid, racist enbtitiy that is Israel.

We are defeating the purpose

by EdBriody on September 02 2011, @06:24 am

We are defeating the purpose of the UN by vetoing decisions condemning the criminal actions of the Israeli Government.
We are supplying the most advanced weapons to Israel to initiate and cleverly provoke wars against its neighbors. And then the supporters of Israel's crimes in our Government wonder why Israel lives in a hostile neighborhood!
The same US Governvent elected Congressmen and Presidents give Israel the advanced aircraft to deliver Nuclear Bombs on neighboring States. (Another reason people from those menaced States go to Iraq and Afghanistan to kill our American soldiers).
Our chosen leaders deny with Israel that over 500,000 Palestinians were driven off their land by a Zionist master plan and deny the right of their return ignoring the 1948 UN resolution recognizing that right.
Of course it is difficult since the Zionist plan was to rob personal goods, destroy the homes, destroy hundreds of villages and rename the areas with made up names (and teach children it did not commit these crimes). Thinking only Israelies deserve justice Zionists decided Jews who never lived or even owned something in Isarel have 'the right to return'.

Troll. Be silent. You're in

by Anonymous on September 02 2011, @12:52 am

Troll. Be silent. You're in over your head as usual.

I don't get why you're

by Anonymous on August 31 2011, @01:09 pm

I don't get why you're complaining about "international law violations" by Israel. After all, the NYT doesn't report on violations by American OR the Palestinians. So if anything, it's biased NOT to point to something Israel does and label it a war crime if you aren't willing to do the same across the board.

Yeah. No. Fail. The NYT has a

by Khazaria on August 31 2011, @03:03 pm

Yeah. No. Fail.

The NYT has a long record of hyping alleged acts of "terror" by the Palestinian "militants" as indeed all iPalestinians are referred to by the MSM. Never mind that every single one of these cases is a reprisal for a much more serious Zionist war crime. Naturally the apartheid-loving U.S press deliberately leaves this important fact out of their propaganda and refers to "israeli" war crimes as a "strike" or "reprisal" or "defending" itself. Anyone with a grade-school education can easily see through this absurd charade but for fear of incurring the poisonous wrath of the Zionist Elite few dare to point out the true nature of the emperors new clothes.

As for American war crimes exposed in the New York Times, the record is long and unambiguous. A casual search through their website turns up plenty of info on heinous crimes committed by American forces and operatives all over the world. The same cannot be said of the Mossad or the "israeli" militants, terrorists/settlers, and standing army, often ranked as the fourth most powerful in the entire world due largely to immunity from international censure thanks to its U.S shielding and the vast sums of tax payer funds gifted to the Zionist colony every single day.

Your lack of knowledge on the subject borders on hate-speak and you underestimation of Adbusters readership belies your true intent as a rather obvious and juvenile troll.

So if the NYT referred to

by Anonymous on September 01 2011, @06:20 am

So if the NYT referred to both the settlers and Hamas as "terrorists" you would be happy? I should remind you that many Palestinian groups are officially considered terrorists by the US government, so unless you are more loyal to Palestine than to your own country, you would stop complaining about that label.

Uh..yeah. I think the whole

by Tpayne on September 02 2011, @01:08 am

Uh..yeah. I think the whole world would be happy if "Israel" was finally outed for what it is: fraud, crime against humanity and terrorism.
Lets not forget that Hamas was democratically elected in an election observed by the likes of Jimmy Carter, etc. The same of course cannot be said of the representatives of "Israel." No international monitors to assure the fairness of their alleged "election."
Yeah I think most people would agree that a double standard such as the glaring one practiced by The NYTimes implies bias and therefore renders incompetent the integrity of your supposed journalism.

And being labeled a "terrorist" by the U.S government these days is meaningless. Heck it's almost the equivalent of being given street cred in the global rebellion against imperialism, corporatism and late-stage capitalism.

What will you be left with, oh Zionist cannon-fodder, when all your usual canards have been deconstructed? "Anti-Semite"? Gone. No longer holds any power - has been thoroughly deconstructed and exposed. "Terrorist"? Debunked. Useless. Too many students see through your laughable attempt at monopolizing language. What else? How about the Jewish myth of race? Seriously. All your propaganda is being unraveled. Soon you will be gone? Absorbed into the fold of humanity. And you know what? It's about time. Get off your fucking high-horse of Judeo-Supremacy with your absurd "Chosen" myth and join the rest of the world. So we can all move on. And evolve.

I don't know about the

by EJ on September 01 2011, @01:26 pm

I don't know about the original commenter, but I'd be happy to lose the 'terrorist' label altogether. There are 'terrorist' acts, and those should be reported on in such a manner that - when the label is applied, the article explains how it's a terrorist act (i.e.: targeting non-combatants). But for people & groups - yeah, the same standards should be applied to the various 'sides' in a conflict, i.e. 'reprisals' - sure, use that for both Israeli and Hamas acts.

Or point out that specific acts (by both) "are _seen as_ reprisals for previous acts by the other side" - if that language was always used, to apply to both groups, ok that's a start. Then perhaps mention the history, and how the creation of the state of Israel itself was not done in the most... let's say, fair & inclusive manner. I.e., that the roots of (legitimate) upset go deep into the past many decades. Mention the (illegal) 1967 war that violated (expanded) the previous boundaries of Israel (for all intents & purposes - 'boundaries'? how about "land under Israeli control"), which themselves weren't negotiated fairly.

Perhaps point out some analyses of how Israel, for better or worse, planned or opportunistic, has become the US's main military 'point person' in the Middle East. I.e. that there's a reflexive reaction amongst some of the entrenched more militarist power elite in this country to flinch at any consideration that Israel can ever do any wrong... "They're our best ally", "They're the only democracy in the Middle East". Ignoring the fact that, while not a theocracy, their intermingling of economic rights w/ religion/ethnicity makes them not really a democracy as we'd even assert it. And ignoring the fact that, (multiple!) fair, two-state settlements (over many years...) have been opposed by the staunch militarists who've been in power in Israel for most of the past few decades.

And as far as labeling groups terrorist, I would hope that we all know there's a political dimension to that.. yeah, the UN Gen'l Assembly has condemned Israel's illegal occupation & settlements, but all heck would break loose if anyone would imply that this makes them a 'rogue state' or worse, a state sponsor of terrorism & genocide (even though, one could make that case). Again, I'd prefer that the actual facts be reported on, without emotionally charged buzzword labels.

Yes, EJ, fact-based reportage

by matthew_1 on September 03 2011, @12:11 pm

Yes, EJ, fact-based reportage would be a welcome change from the emotionally-driven, familial and nationalistic bias that affects most of the US MSM's coverage of this issue! Agreed.

Pretty much everyone who

by U.N 194/242 on August 31 2011, @01:37 am

Pretty much everyone who tunes into Adbusters already knows that The New York Times along with virtually all corporate news, entertainment and publishing in the U.S are radically, violently, almost religiously anti-Arab, Anti-Semitic (Palestinians, Syrians, Lebanese, ie real Semites as opposed to made up ones) and is staffed and run by profound Zionist-Sympathizers.

Thank you however for reminding everyone what kind of country the U.S is that such unbridled propaganda is still held up by seemingly intelligent citizens as legitimate reportage.

One day soon we will look back and marvel that such a society existed where this hypocritical brand of blatant racism and support for ethnic cleansing could be so flagrantly touted as "all the news that's fit to print".

It was the ex KGB officers arriving in America after the break up of the soviet union who remarked how much more convincing was the American version of domestic propaganda than the Russian one.With it's illusion of free press and journalistic neutrality the Americans had hypnotized their people so much more effectively. ''What an elaborate machine you have created here' they remarked. Nowhere is this better illustrated than the carefully crafted "accuracies" of the "prize winning" NYT.! Now only 9.99 when you buy the commemorative Star of David dinner plate! Offer ends 9/11. Act now!

Fortunately most young people don't bother with the silly old Grey Lady and it's fraudulent waste of paper. The old guard who still hold the purse strings cling like rats to the life boat of such propaganda but young people today get their news from the web -no less susceptible to lies but also harder for the Zionist goons to contain tho they mightily struggle.

For a well constructed piece on Zionist media racketeering watch "Peace Propaganda and the Promise land". Made by Jews about Zionist henchmen. Truly frightening. Though part 1 has likely been forced off Youtube by these same henchmen it can be seen here:

http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/8771/Peace__Propaganda__amp__The...

Have you not read or watched

by Anonymous on August 30 2011, @10:47 pm

Have you not read or watched "Manufacturing Consent," I advise that you do.

A good read for sure

by jum_jum on August 30 2011, @01:52 pm

A good read for sure but,um,so what else is new? Did you hear we sent a man to the moon?
Why single out the NYT? The Washington Post is so one-sided that what they call reporting
would be better labeled indoctrination. Pretty much any MSM you choose has this same bent and
should you look into specifics,as you did in this case,you would find the same tilt.
That goes double for anything that comes out of Hollywood! And don't even start on radio!
Oh,and did you know we elected a "black man" as President??

Great piece! -West

by Anonymous on August 30 2011, @11:04 am

Great piece!

-West Philadelphia.

Thanks for reading my piece.

by matthew_1 on August 30 2011, @10:12 am

Thanks for reading my piece. What do you think? Cheers, jeers, agreements, rebuttals? How are we going to get the mainstream media to cover Israel/Palestine from a neutral standpoint, and through the lens of international law and human rights?

This is a well written piece,

by Anonymous on August 31 2011, @06:56 am

This is a well written piece, and it shouldn't be discouraging that many of the comments here say you're preaching to the choir. It's simply frustrating for many of us who know how the media operates to watch it continue. the mainstream media is inherently non-democratic for the reasons outlined in the propaganda model. there's little hope it can be reformed without changing the function of the institution. The answer for us is independent media, such as Democracy Now, Adbusters, and other sources working in the margins. Our biggest obstacle is not with reaching main stream media, but reaching their audiences.

I'm sure you're familiar with

by Anonymous on August 30 2011, @10:38 am

I'm sure you're familiar with the propaganda model, but if not-

http://youtu.be/f6JqFtDWfxI

based on the predictions of the model, it's difficult for me to imagine mainstream media coverage from a neutral position. The first step may be media literacy- finding ways to educate on the way people consume and interpret media information. Can media reform be initiated from the top down? I'm interested in your take on this.