Post Anarchism - #OCCUPYWALLSTREET

America's Decline

Thomas Friedman, David Brooks, Charlie Rose and Kono Matsu square off.

“I personally think that we need a third party. I think we are caught in the middle of a corrupt duopoly that cannot get to the right answers anymore because of a lot of deeply embedded things that have happened to American politics. I think we need to blow this system wide open. I hope the Tea Party is just a precursor of something much bigger.”
Tom Friedman on Charlie Rose

“I have made a career out of making fun of all the decline warnings that have happened over the last 30 years, but nonetheless I am more pessimistic now than I ever have been before. In part because we have a government problem. As Tom says, we have a duopoly, two parties growing ever more rigid, ever more incapable of functioning. And secondly we have a middle age problem … Mancur Olson wrote a great book called The Rise and Decline of Nations, about how as nations become more middle-aged they become encrusted with arrangements and habits and things which slow them down. And I think that’s happening, certainly on a governmental level, the crony capitalism that is now the norm in Washington. And I think it’s happening economically, the decline in small business formation, the stagnation of middle-class wages. These are long-term, not cyclical, problems. So I’m much more pessimistic than I was, and see a potential at least for some absolute decline without some sort of gigantic shakeup of the political system in the way Tom envisions. I don’t see a third party there right now, but I hope so.”
David Brooks on Charlie Rose

THE RISE OF THE TRUECOST
PARTY OF AMERICA


Hey Charlie Rose, I still really enjoy the occasional wake-up moments you deliver like the ones above, but lately I’m feeling downright antsy sitting here night after night watching your TV talk show avoid the big questions. At a time when America is in economic, political and cultural free fall, where are the radical voices envisioning a new future? Where are the ecological economists, the outside thinkers, the voices from the far left and far right, the protest organizers, the anarchists, the downshifters and the indigenous sages? Where are Norman Finkelstein, Saul Newman, Manuel Castells? Damn it, Charlie, why can’t you break out of your New York echo chamber every now and again and give us the next Ivan Illich, Michel Foucault or Malcolm X?

Kono Matsu

What do you think? What is the status of our intellectual elite? Who are the outside thinkers paving the way towards a better tomorrow? Share them below.

64 comments on the article “America's Decline”

Displaying 11 - 20 of 64

Page 2 of 7

kritter33

the terms "right wing" and "left wing" are so meaningless.. One could call both Louis XIV and Milton Friedman radical right-wingers, even though they would agree on next to nothing, and likewise with Chairman Mao and Gandhi at the opposite end. Thought experiment: who is more left-wing? Mao or Gandhi?.... Some would call the far-left ultra-pacifist hippies, yet others think of the far-left as militant class-warfarists. Either big-government militants or anti-military internationalists... the left wing can't be both. thinking in terms of Left-Right is completely up to subjective interpretation and practically useless.

kritter33

the terms "right wing" and "left wing" are so meaningless.. One could call both Louis XIV and Milton Friedman radical right-wingers, even though they would agree on next to nothing, and likewise with Chairman Mao and Gandhi at the opposite end. Thought experiment: who is more left-wing? Mao or Gandhi?.... Some would call the far-left ultra-pacifist hippies, yet others think of the far-left as militant class-warfarists. Either big-government militants or anti-military internationalists... the left wing can't be both. thinking in terms of Left-Right is completely up to subjective interpretation and practically useless.

one woman

being a corporate whore and a god fearing christian make you right wing.

As a non christian, my religious freedom alone is reason enough to influence my vote.

As an individual I realize that corporations need MUCH MORE strict regulations. Profiteering is the ultimate evil in this world. With out concern for the consequences AND unregulated our world will be raped and plundered by the corporate conglomerates that repeatedly FUCK this country and the bottom 80%!!!

Is no one else concerned about this?

Am I really alone out here questioning all political motivations? . . . . . . . . . . . .

one woman

being a corporate whore and a god fearing christian make you right wing.

As a non christian, my religious freedom alone is reason enough to influence my vote.

As an individual I realize that corporations need MUCH MORE strict regulations. Profiteering is the ultimate evil in this world. With out concern for the consequences AND unregulated our world will be raped and plundered by the corporate conglomerates that repeatedly FUCK this country and the bottom 80%!!!

Is no one else concerned about this?

Am I really alone out here questioning all political motivations? . . . . . . . . . . . .

AlarmClock

For the sake of argument, let me concede and say that profiteering is in fact the ultimate evil. One of Ron Paul's main platforms is to end the Federal Reserve, which if you dont already know is nothing more than a banking cartel, charging interest to the American people on money it created out of thin air. The 15 or so multi-national banks are easily some of the biggest profiteers this world has ever known. Thus, electing Ron Paul over the other talking heads would be a start. Regulation of corporations without removing the corrupt monetary system that backs them is paramount to putting a bandaid on a gun shot wound.

AlarmClock

For the sake of argument, let me concede and say that profiteering is in fact the ultimate evil. One of Ron Paul's main platforms is to end the Federal Reserve, which if you dont already know is nothing more than a banking cartel, charging interest to the American people on money it created out of thin air. The 15 or so multi-national banks are easily some of the biggest profiteers this world has ever known. Thus, electing Ron Paul over the other talking heads would be a start. Regulation of corporations without removing the corrupt monetary system that backs them is paramount to putting a bandaid on a gun shot wound.

Anonymous

How do you figure Ron Paul to be right wing?

He's not an evangelist, he's not pro corporate business, he's not a war monger, he's anti-establishment (small government) - he's the closest thing to an anarchist America has seen since the 1700's - that's why everyone shuns him. I'm surprised he hasn't been called that yet...

Anonymous

How do you figure Ron Paul to be right wing?

He's not an evangelist, he's not pro corporate business, he's not a war monger, he's anti-establishment (small government) - he's the closest thing to an anarchist America has seen since the 1700's - that's why everyone shuns him. I'm surprised he hasn't been called that yet...

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.