The Carnivalesque Rebellion Issue

The Per Capita Principle

Lets go viral with this idea.
Photo illustration by Morgan Slade and Alex Gross
Photo illustration by Morgan Slade and Alex Gross

2.8 Tons

In a fair world this number represents your own annual C02 emission limit – a limit necessary to maintain a hospitable climate on this planet. Right now developed nations are a long way off the mark. The average North American is responsible for about 20 tons of C02 emissions per year – seven times the per person limit.

The idea that we should share global carbon emissions is called the “per capita principle.” At its heart is the notion that every person living on the planet equally shares the right to emit greenhouse gases. If all seven billion of us share equal carbon emission rights, then climatologists estimate that 2.8 tons of C02 is the limit that each person can emit if we are to have a good chance at keeping the planet’s mean annual temperature from increasing by more than two degrees Celsius (which in 2009 many G8 leaders, Obama included, agreed we must do).

What will be the result if we fail to achieve this goal over the next nine years? Extinction, probably. According to leading climatologist Hans Joachim Schellnhuber of Germany, if we fail to reduce our per person carbon emissions to 2.8 tons by 2020, the human species stands little chance of survival.

Share this with friends and strangers alike, let’s go viral with this idea.

66 comments on the article “The Per Capita Principle”

Displaying 1 - 10 of 66

Page 1 of 7

Daniel Peach

Yeah! Let's all take equal responsibility for fixing climate change. We all played an equal role in creating the problem, right? Let's come together as a human race!

Come on! What an absurd oversimplification of reality.

Daniel Peach

Yeah! Let's all take equal responsibility for fixing climate change. We all played an equal role in creating the problem, right? Let's come together as a human race!

Come on! What an absurd oversimplification of reality.

M...M / C...C /...

In fact it is you Daniel Peach who have oversimplified reailty. The Per Capita Principle does not suggest that everyone played an equal role in creating the problem, only that perhaps, for once, climate change can and should be the one problem that the world actually solves ALL together. Your cynical reaction is as useless as Canada's government, which consistently waits by the sidelines, waiting for President Obama to somehow accelerate the glacial velocity of the U.S. Congress to pass its climate change bill, all the while claiming it doesn't want to hurt its economy. In reality, Prime Minister Harper doesn't want to lead anything besides the slaves in his own cabinet, being the supreme dicatator-wanabe that he is.

And to clarify, as a Marxist I obviously have my own thoughts regaring our current political economy, yet I do acknowledge the reality which is that for the foreseeable future, we are stuck with a capitalist economy and must work within its framework; however, that doesn't mean we should simply transport wholesale capitalism's ridiculuous notions of private property, infinite growth and individual freedom above all as bases for a climate change solution. The next time you feel like criticizing an article for oversimplification, I suggest you refrain from doing so yourself.

M...M / C...C /...

In fact it is you Daniel Peach who have oversimplified reailty. The Per Capita Principle does not suggest that everyone played an equal role in creating the problem, only that perhaps, for once, climate change can and should be the one problem that the world actually solves ALL together. Your cynical reaction is as useless as Canada's government, which consistently waits by the sidelines, waiting for President Obama to somehow accelerate the glacial velocity of the U.S. Congress to pass its climate change bill, all the while claiming it doesn't want to hurt its economy. In reality, Prime Minister Harper doesn't want to lead anything besides the slaves in his own cabinet, being the supreme dicatator-wanabe that he is.

And to clarify, as a Marxist I obviously have my own thoughts regaring our current political economy, yet I do acknowledge the reality which is that for the foreseeable future, we are stuck with a capitalist economy and must work within its framework; however, that doesn't mean we should simply transport wholesale capitalism's ridiculuous notions of private property, infinite growth and individual freedom above all as bases for a climate change solution. The next time you feel like criticizing an article for oversimplification, I suggest you refrain from doing so yourself.

M...M / C...C /...

If your comment made any sense I could respond. As it stands I can only offer my apologies to your English teacher.

M...M / C...C /...

If your comment made any sense I could respond. As it stands I can only offer my apologies to your English teacher.

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.