The Revolution Issue

I, Revolution

The future does not compute ... It's time to accept radical change as a viable alternative.
I, Revolution - Photo by Stefano Rellandini
A protester throws a rock at riot police outside Aviano Air Base in northern Italy.
Photo by Stefano Rellandini

A Brief History of Revolution
A Brief History of Revolution

Audio version read by George Atherton


In all revolutions, the agents of change – usually a small core of fired-up individuals – reach a personal point of reckoning where to do nothing becomes harder than to step forward. Then come the televised actions, the rebellions on campus, the random acts of defiance in high schools, supermarkets, malls, workplaces. A mass of support accrues. The little daily confrontations escalate. Momentum builds.

And finally the revolution ignites. Very often the ignition spark is a single symbolic act that takes the old power structure by surprise, a gesture that becomes a metaphor, living forever. Rosa Parks refuses to give up her seat on the bus. A Vietnam protester feeds a daisy into the barrel of a rifle. A dissident stares down a line of tanks in Tiananmen Square. Nelson Mandela walks out of his prison cell in South Africa. A freedom flotilla breaks the siege on Gaza. These memes penetrate skulls like bullets.

The biggest impediment to revolution is a personal one: our own deep-seated feelings of cynicism and impotence. How can anything “I” do possibly make a difference? Most of us have trouble accepting radical change as a viable option. Entrenched in a familiar world, we cannot imagine another. It’s hard to see our current system as simply one stage of a never-ending cycle that sooner or later will fall and be succeeded – but this process of creative destruction is exactly how the world works.

We don’t need a million activists to jumpstart this revolution. We just need an influential minority that smells the blood, seizes the moment and pulls off a set of well-coordinated strategic moves. We need a certain level of collective disillusionment (a point I think we have now reached) and then we need the leaders of the affluent, “First” world nations to fumble a world crisis like global warming, a stock market crash or a nuclear standoff in the Middle East. By waiting for the right moment and then jamming in unison, a global network of a few hundred of us can pull the coup off. This November we create a sudden, unexpected moment of truth – a mass reversal of perspective; a global mindshift – from which the corporate/consumerist forces never fully recover.

What will you do? Share your ideas: [email protected]

For the Wild, Kalle


Part: 12345678910

Audio iconRight-click to download the full audio version of "A Brief History of Revolution"

92 comments on the article “I, Revolution”

Displaying 21 - 30 of 92

Page 3 of 10

Elliott

I am an avid subscriber also and i partially agree with this statement. Adbusters as a whole seems to be an organization against the modern 'zombie consumerism', but seems to hold back when trying to find a solution. i always thought this was because they were trying to convince others to take original action but with this ideology of a revolution they've put forward (one I'm mostly for) it seems that there is a lack of longevity. sure, repent the system but what happens after? humans have a knack for looking only in the short term.

Elliott

I am an avid subscriber also and i partially agree with this statement. Adbusters as a whole seems to be an organization against the modern 'zombie consumerism', but seems to hold back when trying to find a solution. i always thought this was because they were trying to convince others to take original action but with this ideology of a revolution they've put forward (one I'm mostly for) it seems that there is a lack of longevity. sure, repent the system but what happens after? humans have a knack for looking only in the short term.

anonymous

There is an enormous amount of anticapitalist literature that has been accumulating over the years. I'd suggest getting familiar with libertarian forms of anticapitalism such as anarchism, or social ecology, or even communalism. Personally I favor anarchist-communism and other forms of libertarian socialism. Certain aspects of anti-civilation theory are appealing as well. Read up, there's plenty being discussed right now.

anonymous

There is an enormous amount of anticapitalist literature that has been accumulating over the years. I'd suggest getting familiar with libertarian forms of anticapitalism such as anarchism, or social ecology, or even communalism. Personally I favor anarchist-communism and other forms of libertarian socialism. Certain aspects of anti-civilation theory are appealing as well. Read up, there's plenty being discussed right now.

Jared from Subway

I disagree (not with the article, but with anonymous' comment of Thu, 08/12/2010 - 00:03) - I don't think we need to pre-define the outcome of collective uprising. That we understand the current non-sustainability of our current social/environmental/political/economic system is sufficient grounds for revolutionary action. To predetermine the outcome of that action would be, to an extent, self-defeating, since the impetus for such a revolution is rooted, it would seem, in people's desire to reclaim their sovereignty from corporate manipulation - that is, to have a say in the direction and values of their society (beyond the charade of our current "democratic" system of occassional symbolic elections and their built-in proportional distortions). I think it is sufficient to say we need a revolution against corporate control, against reductionist approaches to environmental management, against colonialism and the current wars being fought for oil, etc. and to leave the ultimate outcome open for people to decide for themselves. I agree with Lasn that a "vanguard" is needed to ignite this; afterwards, however, if this is to be a true "people's movement", the outcome should be OURS to determine - not some pre-conceived plan to be imposed. In the absense of such a predetermined plan we will all be able to speak for the movement - through the individual examples set by our own actions; from this a coherent and sustainable socio-economic order will organically evolve. Finally, if i can paraphrase gandhi: we just need to get the fundamentals right (i.e. a system of truth, justice, compassion, etc.) - after that, the details will fall into place.

Jared from Subway

I disagree (not with the article, but with anonymous' comment of Thu, 08/12/2010 - 00:03) - I don't think we need to pre-define the outcome of collective uprising. That we understand the current non-sustainability of our current social/environmental/political/economic system is sufficient grounds for revolutionary action. To predetermine the outcome of that action would be, to an extent, self-defeating, since the impetus for such a revolution is rooted, it would seem, in people's desire to reclaim their sovereignty from corporate manipulation - that is, to have a say in the direction and values of their society (beyond the charade of our current "democratic" system of occassional symbolic elections and their built-in proportional distortions). I think it is sufficient to say we need a revolution against corporate control, against reductionist approaches to environmental management, against colonialism and the current wars being fought for oil, etc. and to leave the ultimate outcome open for people to decide for themselves. I agree with Lasn that a "vanguard" is needed to ignite this; afterwards, however, if this is to be a true "people's movement", the outcome should be OURS to determine - not some pre-conceived plan to be imposed. In the absense of such a predetermined plan we will all be able to speak for the movement - through the individual examples set by our own actions; from this a coherent and sustainable socio-economic order will organically evolve. Finally, if i can paraphrase gandhi: we just need to get the fundamentals right (i.e. a system of truth, justice, compassion, etc.) - after that, the details will fall into place.

- jacal

I wonder if we the latte drinking clictivists of the affluent West still have the stomach for something like this.

- jacal

I wonder if we the latte drinking clictivists of the affluent West still have the stomach for something like this.

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.