Mirror Neurons
Fourteen years ago neuroscientists introduced the world to a captivating new idea about the way our brains might work: they discovered the existence of specialized brain cells in the brains of macaque monkeys that are activated both when a monkey performs an intentional action (e.g. grabbing a banana) and when it sees another monkey performing that same action. They called these special brain cells mirror neurons since the monkeys mirrored in their own minds the actions of their neighbors. Scientists learned that at the brain level, monkey see was not so different from monkey do.
Even before researchers confirmed the existence of similar mirror neurons in human brains, which they did in 2007, the idea had worked its way into the zeitgeist and become a potent new way of seeing ourselves in relationship with each other. People have begun to wonder if mirror neurons could be responsible for language, culture, empathy and even morality. Where Darwinian survival of the fittest has heretofore imagined us as the strong pitted against the weak in a fatal struggle for food and sex, the mirror neuron suggests the importance of social strengths: that we are hardwired for empathy, that we are naturally interested not only in our own needs but also in the interests of others. As noted philosopher A.C. Grayling has said: “The essential point is that mirror neurons underwrite the ability to recognize what helps or distresses others, what they suffer and enjoy, what they need and what harms them.”
—Andrew Tuplin
20 comments on the article “Mirror Neurons”
Displaying 11 - 20 of 20
Page 2 of 2
friends of Aris...
A play? Its unlikely that this study along with its predecessors had much philosophical motivation or suffered from any biased science. I'd have to dig for it, but I'm almost certain this experiment was done in the earlier part of the last decade in Italy . I applaud experiments like this for helping to clearing the "noise" that plagues the often biased views of human nature leaving only an empirical answer. It may be a sterile approach to learning but I didn't come here for smiles.
friends of Aris...
A play? Its unlikely that this study along with its predecessors had much philosophical motivation or suffered from any biased science. I'd have to dig for it, but I'm almost certain this experiment was done in the earlier part of the last decade in Italy . I applaud experiments like this for helping to clearing the "noise" that plagues the often biased views of human nature leaving only an empirical answer. It may be a sterile approach to learning but I didn't come here for smiles.
Ken Vallario
i am not critiquing the science, great science, and fascinating stuff...i am critiquing this mode of presenting science, as some kind of materialist defense of moral values...like in the following sentence...
"the idea had worked its way into the zeitgeist and become a potent new way of seeing ourselves in relationship with each other."
mirror neurons are a a fascinating explanation of empathy and how it is we learn...but the article is not scientific, it is a small two paragraph article that is meant to present something about 'empathy', and empathy is an emotional concern, and it is not exactly correlated to the discovery...the discovery, if anything, is best interpreted as telling us something about how we learn...
i am sympathetic, even empathetic, to these motivations, i have even 'mirrored' this approach myself occasionally...but i do think using science, against the kind of material reduction that drives much of scientific excess is a dead end street. because the presence of mirror neurons, does not guarantee empathy, and therefore we have not found its ultimate source...
Ken Vallario
i am not critiquing the science, great science, and fascinating stuff...i am critiquing this mode of presenting science, as some kind of materialist defense of moral values...like in the following sentence...
"the idea had worked its way into the zeitgeist and become a potent new way of seeing ourselves in relationship with each other."
mirror neurons are a a fascinating explanation of empathy and how it is we learn...but the article is not scientific, it is a small two paragraph article that is meant to present something about 'empathy', and empathy is an emotional concern, and it is not exactly correlated to the discovery...the discovery, if anything, is best interpreted as telling us something about how we learn...
i am sympathetic, even empathetic, to these motivations, i have even 'mirrored' this approach myself occasionally...but i do think using science, against the kind of material reduction that drives much of scientific excess is a dead end street. because the presence of mirror neurons, does not guarantee empathy, and therefore we have not found its ultimate source...
Anton A
I read "Darwinian" here as "Social Darwinian", the right-libertarian take on Darwinian theory used to excuse naked individual greed as somehow natural.
Anton A
I read "Darwinian" here as "Social Darwinian", the right-libertarian take on Darwinian theory used to excuse naked individual greed as somehow natural.
Anonymous
I am still with out a soul??
Anonymous
I am still with out a soul??
Anonymous
Take a look at the Price equation.
Anonymous
Take a look at the Price equation.
Pages
Add a new comment