Sawadee Krup, Loan Me $200

Kiva.org's microloans are creating new opportunities in developing countries.
Sawadee Krup, Loan Me $200

Last spring I invested $200 in Kiva and discovered microlending. Lending that money to people in the developing world to further their business plans felt like genuine, guilt-free altruism; like teaching someone to create fire instead of tossing a raft at the moat around a stranger’s unfathomable life. For the price of a dinner in the city, I could empower another human’s livelihood by helping feed his or her community’s demand for raw essential materials like animals, spices, seeds, produce, grains, clothing, sewing supplies and so on.

Facing our battered economy, microlending through Kiva (kiva.org) seems like enlightened venture capitalism. Partly because of the glaring lack offine print, but mostly because the $200 I used to start an account last year was the first meaningful investment I’ve ever been able to make. I lent $125 to a Tanzanian woman trying to expand her tailoring business by raising $1,050 for supplies and equipment. The rest went to five women from Uganda – a slice of the $1,375 they needed to start a piggery and buy inventory for a grocery, a used clothing store and a hair salon.

Like the tens of thousands of other profiles at kiva.org, these entrepreneurs’ stories were short and unvarnished, their goals modest. I searched faces from places in perpetual upheaval: Africa, South America, South Asia. I read about people struggling to control their lives by trying to resuscitate their communities: poor farmers and tradespeople; folks who could survive by mobilizing raw goods or essential services; people wanting to create healthy, affordable meals.

Later I recognized this as the brilliance of microfinance: it revalues disposable income (for those who have it) by putting a price tag on basic, necessary, attainable ideas. In Kiva’s excellent model, online lenders and fledgling entrepreneurs are allied via the nonprofit’s field partners, nearly 100 vetted microfinance institutions in 44 countries (and growing) with gaping poverty lines. Their common goal: to flush the world’s poorest pipe dreams with cold, hard cash; to catalyze credit flow for humble people who probably won’t use it to debauch their psyches; to turn dependants into providers using small fortunes.

In about three and a half years, Kiva has funded 145,000-plus impoverished entrepreneurs with more than $60 million. Lenders set a radical pace in 2008, making nearly two loans every minute.Amazingly lenders recoup their investments more than 97 percent of the time, typically within about a year. The two loans I made in early ’08 are mostly repaid, and I’ve recycled that money (plus another $50) to a group of Ugandan produce traders, a pair of Cambodian food retailers and some Pakistani and Filipino grocers.

This is where Kiva really gets interesting: less than 10 percent of lenders actually take back their money. They leave it overseas, let it change lives. You might chalk that up to microfinance’s easy, inexpensive gratification. But what’s happening here is a sea change in charity’s watermark, a reincarnation of the meaning of potential. Microfinance is becoming a beacon for people who are uncomfortable with their geographic advantage.

For example, take the logistics of turning isolated, sometimes destitute entrepreneurs’ loan requests into websites – some 500 translators and editors worldwide donate their time and skills to the effort. Kiva’s fellowship program, perhaps the best hands-on access to a microfinance education you can find, is growing, buoyed by a largely volunteer infrastructure. The San Francisco-based company’s proximity to Silicon Valley has been a perennial resource boon.

Meanwhile, the West’s suicidal economic tendencies have yanked the bulk of us from a black hole into a bloodbath. It makes me wonder: just as the Internet has usurped distribution powers from bloated entertainment labels, could microfinance avert the catastrophe of our free market banks?

The answer may come sooner than you’d think. Why? Because Kiva will soon start lending to Americans.

Eric Rumble is a Contributing Editor at Adbusters and his work has appeared in Up! magazine, Saturday Night, THIS Magazine and the National Post.

Support + Share

Help us spread the word. Share it online with your friends or subscribe to the print edition.

All Comments

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Your last paragraph gave

by Jamie Kim on June 15 2009, @08:37 pm Your last paragraph gave me goosebumps.

This is going to be the

by larry on May 28 2009, @10:37 am This is going to be the future. This will be how we fix the global economy! - Laid Off Larry

These microloans are a total

by Anonymous n on May 19 2009, @10:49 pm These microloans are a total scam. It looks too good to be true. Here is how scam works. First of all you give you loan your money without an interest. Money go to Kiva (which might take a cut from sum you lend), then they go to the field partner what is essentially a bank. They lend money to the poor people and CHARGE 30% or more. If borrowers do not default on a loan, you will get your money back. So it is like payday loan using money of strangers. The only winners are bankers. Poor people become dependent on microloans the same way people in USA get new credit cards to repay old, maxed out ones.

These loans are not a scam at

by Anonymous on July 08 2009, @12:23 pm These loans are not a scam at all. A group of friends and I actually took a trip to Argentina to not only explore the country but to visit the family that we gave loans to. We talked to this man and asked how much money he recieved through the loans and he told us the exact amount that we loaned. This is one of the only websites that is actually legit. You don't know what your talking about...

This is great stuff, I’m

by LeonVries on May 14 2009, @05:57 am This is great stuff, I'm going to look how I can donate so this world can be a better place!

Kiva is a great

by SoloStar on May 09 2009, @01:00 pm Kiva is a great organization. I've contributed to 3 individuals seeking loans so far and it's a great feeling. I love hearing about their progress and knowing that my contributions will help them reach their goals. In the past, I've contributed to many charities that I later found out were using majority of my money for administrative overhead. When giving micro-loans you know that you are making a direct contribution to changing a person's life for the better and I'm just grateful to be a part of that. -About Me 

“Just remember, for every

by slavemaster on May 09 2009, @11:29 am “Just remember, for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction” Really? i realy don't know , but i think we must help.. 

Everything is done on a

by Anonymous on May 07 2009, @08:32 am Everything is done on a barter system in some form or fashion. money or pigs, its all the same. You trade your services for payment. the only difference is how it is supplemented. If you've ever made a purchase via amazon or ebay, you have probably furthered one or another entrepreneur's agenda. There is nothing wrong with that. Being a protectionist in a global market is the problem. Being unaware of how our {America} economy is supported via small business and entrepreneurs is a problem. We had our industrial age. Let others have theirs.

Reply to “Let developing

by Lou on May 07 2009, @04:15 am Reply to "Let developing countries develop on their own. Let them develop naturally and without our corrupting influences." Developing countries cannot develop without our corrupting influence. We live in a intereconnected world..you are correct to point out that every action has an opposite reaction. When you buy your shoes, clothes, when you use fuel to heat your home or run your car, do you stop to think about how your clothes were made- in what conditions, in what factory?? Do you stop to think where your government gets its fuel- how that ends up in your governmet supporting dictatorships in order to keep the oil supply flowing to your car? You are directly hurting people in the developing world everyday through your actions. Stop making excuses and accept your responsiblity. The reason Foreign Aid does not work in many cases is because it goes to the wrong people and is used by them people in a bad, wasteful and often corrupt way. Microloans are a possible sollution to the huge inequality that exists in our world today. Whether you realise it or not people in the developed world benefit directly from the poverty of those in the developing world. To use the negative effects of aid to justify turning a blind eye to those in dire poverty in our world today is irresponsible. This 'its better to let them sort out their own problems' mentality is so frustrating. The reality of the situation is that many people in dire situations do not have the resources to get out of that situation. And here is where people invoke the 'look at Nigeria they have vast natural resources and could sort themselves out if they tried' argument.The US has supported authoritarian leaders in Nigeria because it needs to get oil form these leaders..the US has turned a blind eye to the fact that the aid it gives goes into the pockets of rich corrupt politicians so that people in the US can enjoy warm homes and cars. A child born into Nigeria today does not choose to be born into poverty. That poverty is forced upon the child. We need to work out how we can help such children. We in the Western worl have so many oppurtunites and resources we just need to work out how we can help those individuals whose day to day life is a struggle for survival.

Lou, Thanks for your

by Lloyd Pitcher on May 07 2009, @11:15 am Lou, Thanks for your response. I'm glad that someone out there is thinking about these issues too. I agree with you on the negatives of our current global economic system and the inequalities that they perpetuate. I do realize that when I put gas in my tank some Arab is getting rich, or if I buy a pair of shoes someone in a sweat-shop had to make them....trust me, I get it. What I don't get is foreign aid. How is giving money to people in third world countries going help them? First of all, one must begin with the assumption that their situation is worse than ours. Is this the case? Has the average Chinese person benefited from the move from farmer to sweat-shop worker? Are Americans, fat with Big Macs and Whoppers really that much happier than they were 50 years ago? A micro-loan might be able to allow somebody to come out of poverty and it might do someone "good". But then again, who determines how money should be given out, and who really analyses the effect this loan will have on the community to which it is given? Not me.... The real problem, as I see it, is the very nature of what value is on this earth. Back in the day, the guy in China essentially lived the same as the guy in North Dakota. He had a family, he worked and maybe he got a few nice things for a lifetime of hard work. What happened in the early 70's was the collapse of the gold standard and the rise of fiat currencies. This allowed central banks to create money literally out of thin air. European and US banks were obviously more successful at this and thus used newly created money to buy up the labor and resources of the rest of the world. This system continues to this day and, in my mind, this equates to stealing. This is the system that needs to end! By giving aid you are actually giving back just a small part of the product your country stole in the first place. Now, getting back to loans, I feel that our money would be better served helping those of us here who are having problems. I know it's sexier to support a Masai tribal warrior start his own basket weaving shop but what wrong with trying to solve the problems in our own community? What about the homeless people on the streets of Boston? Or, cleaning up the trash in Camden, NJ? Also, I know it is maybe a little bit out there buthow about advocating for the end of fiat currencies?...Certainly this would create a more equitable economic system for everybody on earth.

yea this isnt a good idea

by Anonymous on May 07 2009, @02:00 am yea this isnt a good idea why dont you just give them the money instead of trying to make a profit of people that are living in the third world because of the country you live in such as the us canada or any country in europe plus australia

I second that, that's not the

by Anonymous on August 03 2009, @08:54 am I second that, that's not the right way to proceed! It's like playing a poker game alone. Sure to win

people arguing, i see the

by Anonymous on May 06 2009, @07:06 am people arguing, i see the future it's filled with cocks

it’s called debating and

by Anonymous on May 06 2009, @12:26 pm it's called debating and it shows that you care about the issues and want to make the world better. it also shows that you can think for yourself. try it.

Its perfect, one click away

by Juan on May 05 2009, @07:08 am Its perfect, one click away activism. Just move your hand to get the job done, and give away some money! Many can take place, and many can be helped. This is a great idea, and for Jeremy... say something rather that talking about others, you are not a messiah.

Got bad news for you, homes

by Jeremy on May 05 2009, @06:23 am Got bad news for you, homes -- this is still capitalism. Commenter #1 gets that, though he also seems to think the rest of the world doesn't use money. Not sure where one might get that impression.

Jeremy, Exporting money

by Lloyd Pitcher on May 05 2009, @07:22 am Jeremy, Exporting money overseas creates a whole host of moral problems. First of all, where did the money come from? Since these days most aid comes from the US Federal Reserve printing money out of thin air, the Third World must rely on richer countries for capitalist "improvements". This creates a pretty rigid dichotomy of First World/Third World, which ultimately makes their dependency on aid more and more apparent. Therefore, the more aid the third world gets...the more they will need. Secondly, influxes of money into developing countries create strong inflationary pressures that lower income people can't keep up with. Lastly, will aid money be distributed equally? How can you be sure that it doesn't create a class system that ultimately will destabilize the economic status quo? Just remember, for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction...and these reactions aren't always positive. Let developing countries develop on their own. Let them develop naturally and without our corrupting influences.

You are overdoing it mate.

by An Earthling on May 06 2009, @12:49 am You are overdoing it mate. When rich give to the poor it may of course result in drug and alcohol addictions like handouts to some of the street beggars. But this is for viable start-ups that will produce more wealth or services for the local people. It can not be corrupting. Probably you meant large government aid that is distributed later by corrupt local governments that just allow to plunder the foreign corporations their resources and keep people at bay by heavy police and military like in Nigeria with blooody Shell and Equador with cancerogenic Texaco?

“Just remember, for every

by Steven Merchant on May 05 2009, @08:21 am "Just remember, for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction" Really? So if I spit on the ground, you mean it will fly back up and hit me in the face? How about you stop talking in tired and untrue cliches? Let me guess, next you're going to say "everything happens for a reason".

“Really? So if I spit on

by Anonymous on June 01 2009, @04:43 pm "Really? So if I spit on the ground, you mean it will fly back up and hit me in the face?" Think harder Steve....

Hah, that was funny. I think

by Alfred on May 30 2009, @02:46 am Hah, that was funny. I think that everything happens for a reason statement is kinda true. Alfred Kirk

Steven, I admit, you’re

by Lloyd Pitcher on May 05 2009, @09:03 am Steven, I admit, you're right. I did use a tired cliche but I hope you get the point. Giving money to third world countries does have unintended, and often, negative consequences. And, most of the time these people are better off "developing" by themselves at their own speed. I'll try to make my future comments more analytical just for you.

Leave your money here. Stop

by Anonymous on May 05 2009, @04:09 am Leave your money here. Stop poisoning foreigners with your money system. I'm all for volunteering your time over there, but is giving them money really making their lives better? Or is it simply exporting our value system?

"Stop poisoning foreigners

by Kevin on May 05 2009, @11:36 am

"Stop poisoning foreigners with your money system"

Hmm I didn't realize that these people were still on the bartar system...

I think the focus of this article (and microloans in general) should be instead of lending people in developing nations huge lump sums of money, it is better to empower people by giving small loans to a large number of people. This will allow citizens to rise out of poverty by their own means, rather than simply relying on handouts from foreign nations and supranational organizations like the WorldBank which simply keeps these nations in a cycle of debt.

As for whether these people should be striving towards a western hyper-consumption based lifestyle is another issue altogether...

Just wonderful ! I wonder

by A Human Being on May 05 2009, @01:46 am Just wonderful ! I wonder what would happen to the world if all the bailout fraud capital would go to micro-lending instead

I second that, Billions are

by bastille77 on May 17 2009, @04:12 pm I second that, Billions are lost to fraud in corrupt governments (nepotism,stashing funds in hidden accounts,trading favors for campaign cash etc) and if it could somehow be diverted to organizations like kiva instead (wishful thinking) it could do a world of good. I saw kiva at work during a public television profile and I was duly very impressed. Save MY Marriage