Endgame Strategies

The Politics of Youth

Adbusters Contributing Editor Micah White asked Michael Hardt whether he thinks Generation Obama has revolutionary potential.

Michael Hardt is an American political philosopher and literary theorist. His ongoing collaboration with Antonio Negri has resulted in some of the most exciting books published on politics in recent decades. Hardt and Negri have published three important critiques of late capitalism and globalization: Labor of Dionysus: A Critique of the State-Form (1994), Empire (2000) and Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire (2004). These three works have been highly praised by contemporary activists. Empire, for example, has been hailed as “nothing less than a rewriting of The Communist Manifesto for our time” by the Lacanian philosopher Slavoj Žižek. Others have referred to it as “one of the most comprehensive theoretical efforts to understand globalization.” In the end, Hardt and Negri’s most important contribution to activist praxis may be their promotion of a new concept of resistance – articulated in the figure of the multitude – that continues to inform contemporary debates on activist strategy.

Adbusters Contributing Editor Micah White asked Michael Hardt whether he thinks Generation O has revolutionary potential...

Of course!

I’ve been really impressed by the activists in North America, the US in particular, in the last ten years. I think this younger generation’s ability to dispense with notions of purity – moral and political purity – is one element that marks an advance with respect to the activists of the ’60s. Contemporary activists have been able to recognize how political struggle has to be a joyful operation. Their actions involve a new kind of relationship to pleasure and desire by translating them into events that are sometimes carnivalesque and sometimes theatrical. There has also been significant decentralization and democratization within the movements themselves.

It seems to me that the young activists that I’ve met in North America, Europe and elsewhere all understand the important relationship between affect and activism. In other words, the young activists of today have completely dispelled an older notion of the serious and suffering, ascetic and often sad concept of political militancy. They recognize that an important aspect of political activism is the joy of struggle itself, the joy of political activism and the joy of communities that are constructed through political activism.

•••

Obama’s election is, of course, not the end of political struggle or the end of modes of resistance. That is obvious. What it does mark is a new context in which struggles can be more rational and more productive. The hope is that we won’t have to engage with the most obvious and stupid struggles anymore, like we had to against the Bush regime. You know, the quality of one’s enemy has something to do with making one more or less intelligent. And I think that struggling against Bush made us stupid. Because we had to struggle against the most obvious of things: against torture, against the occupation in Iraq. I hope that we don’t have to struggle against these in the years to come. My hope for the Obama presidency is that we will be able to focus on struggles that really designate a better world. That does not mean utopian aspirations for the Obama presidency, but rather utopian aspirations for the kind of struggles that can be born under, and sometimes against, an Obama administration. I am hoping that the activists of Generation O can start from a more reasonable and advanced position, which can make their struggles more intelligent, productive and aspiring.

Support + Share

Help us spread the word. Share it online with your friends or subscribe to the print edition.

All Comments

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

power to the people

by Anonymous on April 14 2009, @12:17 pm power to the people cameraman's outlet

To Motorod: Unfortunately I

by Anonymous on April 08 2009, @03:01 pm To Motorod: Unfortunately I have to disagree with you. I don't think the only way to gain power and insue change is to join/create a political party. There are a lot of people out there who are not involved with any political party but are still trying to fight against the government and for what they believe in. Look at Ghandi, he did great things and inspired future generations around the world and he wasn't involved in a political party. It dissapoints me to see people who are so closed-minded such as you. Are you part of a politcal party? Because if you aren't, you're just another one of the "sniveling sycophantic do-nothing wimp"s. I applaud the real activists out there who are fighting against sexism, racism, corruption, and doing something useful with their time rather than calling people names for their own ammusement.

the notion the title

by microwave nation on March 27 2009, @09:38 pm the notion the title 'generation o' is a derivative from name "o"bama is not a refreshing sign the movement is of new aspiration. but one thing is for certain, "intelligence" is repeated by hardt over and over, and while I suppose this is important for hardt, I think he over thinks the youth of today's lack of history as representative of some sort of transformational birth. almost apriora. the only distinguishing factor from this generation o over y, or x, or the baby boomers is their undeniable willingness to accept uncritically the promise of a never blooming rose while having no references of Ronald Reagan. purely inspired, i am sure.

(No subject)

by jerm ix on March 26 2009, @07:22 pm barack obama says "i had a dream"

“Seems to me that bunch of

by Motorod on March 09 2009, @10:59 am "Seems to me that bunch of Nancys are reading these articles. Fear-mongering defeatist attitudes abound! " Amen, Ted. What a bunch of puling nihilist asswipes writing here. Anybody w/ sense knows that power rests with the governed. You could throw off any "system" you disagreed with. Go join a local political party or start one, otherwise you're just a sniveling sycophantic do-nothing wimp, regurgitating the same old tired and pointless anti-government crap. The American Founders threw off British rule w/ support of only 14% of the population. How did Gandhi rout the British? All this crap about how nothing has changed, will change, can change is ignorant defeatist bullshit, an excuse for you to stay out drinking or at home smoking pot and not getting involved, so your lazy ass can stay "outraged" at how fucked things are. You're like spoiled petulant children. From the letters here, America has always had the government it deserves.

Obama is a distraction. He

by Anonymous on March 08 2009, @11:02 pm Obama is a distraction. He sings the sheep to sleep with his well crafted speeches and charisma. And while the sheep enjoy there deep slumber, Obama ever so quietly sends a few predator drones into Waziristan to bomb the shit out of some "terrorists" But i guess its easy to ignore the screams of arab children when the new and improved brand of american facists are repeatedly chanting "Yes, we can!"

This cultlike worship of

by Anonymous on March 06 2009, @11:27 am This cultlike worship of Obama should make any truly independent thinker lay awake at night. The branding of Obama--from the iconic imagery, t-shirt, and group label "Generation O"--would make Starbucks and Nike blush.

I agree. What sacres me

by awaxler1 on March 08 2009, @04:02 pm I agree. What sacres me more than anything is the blind passion people have for Obama. I'm not saying he is doing a good job or bad job...personally, I think it is too early to tell. But the same way I think it is dangerous for people like Rush Limbaugh and his followers to hope Obama fails...I also think it is dangerous to blindly follow any leader/politician and not question what he does. I have always questioned the decisions of my leaders regardless of what party they belong to... --Adam

it does.

by Anonymous on March 08 2009, @01:12 am it does.

I find it fascinating, there

by Anonymous on March 05 2009, @03:56 pm I find it fascinating, there are many people posting on this article who seem to have problems with the two-party system in this country. There is a general agreement that the government is corrupt in that it mainly benefits the interests of corperations. I would have to agree that we have been electing presidents in this country who have kept the same employees and work, in essence, for companies that stand to profit from having an elected official working for them. However, I find myself rather amused at the obvious public disapproval of this system of governmet, yet it lives on. Companies can sponsor a candidate, spend millions on television advertizing, smear other candidates, but people seem to forget who ultimately puts those dictators and facists in office... us. Just because a Republican and Democrat are in the limelight during election time, it doesn't mean you are obligated to vote for them. There are many third parties to choose from, and I am not attempting to gain support for any specific party... People don't like voting for the candidate that they feel will lose, but it is our votes that decide the winner...

Some of the criticism is

by Foolish on March 04 2009, @11:39 pm Some of the criticism is valid and I hope to hear more. I still would like to ask...

how do you distinguish

by Foolish on March 04 2009, @11:33 pm how do you distinguish between a corporate troll and a babbling idiot?

IDK, You Tell Me :]

by Zinkhoff on March 05 2009, @12:06 pm IDK, You Tell Me :]

What meaningless drivel.

by Squirrel on March 04 2009, @06:52 pm What meaningless drivel. Seems someone was asked to write something when they had nothing to say. But pay check awaits. Adbusters editorial content continues to deteriorate. Perhaps the messiah is flawed. What is left?

perhaps, just like

by Anonymous on March 03 2009, @02:04 pm perhaps, just like adbusters, nothing said here is valid unless your protests are matched by action

thats the truth.

by Anonymous on March 06 2009, @05:34 am thats the truth.

How about we wait more than

by Anonymous on March 03 2009, @08:01 am How about we wait more than a month before comparing Obama's presidency to Bush's. That goes for Hardt as well as those critical, judgmental kids who spend their time on a website they supposedly hate.

To me though it seems like

by shaf on March 03 2009, @01:49 am To me though it seems like lots of youth just try to chose their political ideologies (among other things) based on what their peers say... I think that is extremely dangerous...

I agree its sad becuase your

by Anonymous on March 06 2009, @05:39 am I agree its sad becuase your ideologies and such should come from your own investigations and not what is widely excepted. It is extremely dangerous the youth don't relize how much potential they have to start their own revolution and leave a positive mark in history for their generation.

I really enjoyed the

by Anonymous on March 02 2009, @11:06 pm I really enjoyed the beginning of this interview when he discussed how aware the young activists are! Which is true. The rest of this peice going on about Bush-this and Obama-that. All a bunch of pickle shoot if you ask me. It is almost as if this guy is saying Obama is any better then Bush. They are the same military-industrial-media-complex tool. Sign this bill, sign that bill. Drop a bomb over there, drop a bomb right here. Regulate this, deregulate that. Troops here, troops there. Bail him out, don't bail her out. This Hardt is settling for a little better than Bush (or appears better). Which as a result is settling for mediocracy. Something that has been happening for a long time. This always confused me a bit. Why settle for okay when it comes to the people who are supposed to be representing you? Do you settle for mediocracy when it comes to yourself? or the ones you love? Peace in the Middle East.

Well said. I think it is

by Anonymous on March 03 2009, @02:13 pm Well said. I think it is disappointing to see a magazine that preaches real change fall head over heels for a candidate with 90% of the same staff of the previous two presidents. Sure, he's got better branding, but one would expect Adbusters readers to see through that. They all have the same employees, same employers, work for the same corporate welfare as the president before them.

Adbusters should interview

by Anonymous on March 02 2009, @08:13 pm Adbusters should interview Derrick Jensen sometime. He's always good for a dose a reality.

i was actually expecting him

by mikezephyr on March 06 2009, @11:02 am i was actually expecting him in it given the mag's called ENDGAME strategies, and that they also had a bit of Quinn's Beyond Civilization! i have a strong suspicion that the editors and writers are explicitly if not implicitly referring to Jensen's works.

well those same people

by Spaz on March 02 2009, @07:08 pm well those same people support the system. And for all you trash talkers, shut up!! Jesus Christ!! If yall don't like adbusters then don't come to the site, and stop being such little cry babies about it.

obama’s ascendancy for the

by Anonymous on March 02 2009, @05:19 pm obama's ascendancy for the democratic party is the final move by both parties toward total national socialism. it might look like a kinder and gentiler government but its foundation is wholly corrupt. stop thinking obama is different than bush. the same evil in a different colour package.

generation o, are you fuckin

by tyler durden on March 02 2009, @05:07 pm generation o, are you fuckin kiddin me. DIRTY-STUPID-FILTHY-EVIL-UGLY-ROTTEN-HIPPIES!

sticking feathers up your

by Anonymous on March 03 2009, @05:30 pm sticking feathers up your butt does not make you a chicken.

This is a bullshit article

by Hypnic Jerk on March 02 2009, @11:29 am This is a bullshit article from a bullshit publication. ADBUSTERS is just more Hipster trash that characteristically tries to make itself cooler by criticizing youth trends (ala Vice or Gawker), while simultaneously trying to market to them overpriced consumer goods(ala Blackspot or American Apparel). These goods are eaten up by the generation criticized in an effort to regain "coolness" and status. ADBUSTERS is an arbitrary authority that helps consumer capitalism placate youth.

Seems to me that bunch of

by Ted Turner on March 02 2009, @10:25 am Seems to me that bunch of Nancys are reading these articles. Fear-mongering defeatist attitudes abound! In that case, who happens to be the real clown?

Yeah, instead of Bush’s

by Anonymous on March 01 2009, @04:16 am Yeah, instead of Bush's occupation in Iraq, it's Obama's occupation in Afghanistan. Oh, and the capitalist backlash that has turned to the socialism that's gearing-up. How best to control a population than by controlling it's finances; enter the "nationalization" of banks, going on right now, courtesy of Dear Leader Obama. Trading one puppet-dictator for another. Way to go USA!