Stop shooting the messenger!!! Without a doubt the rich one billion people on the planet who consume 80% of the goodies in the global marketplace (leaving a lousy 20% of the global pie to the rest of the five billion) are the greedy pigs of our planet and the root cause of the ecological and political crises we now find ourselves in . . . everyone with a footprint greater than five shut the fuck up! — Kono Matsu

you guys are too serious, relax

Well people have said most of what I'd like to. I guess when the s hits the fan as it is now people what to come together to act...not to be divided and continue the fingerpointing and cajoling. Those things have there place-to get peoples attention, but now that we're all ears it's destructive. Please turn your focus now - I still dig the site and I've been as much a non-consumer as one can be...but we need leaders not dissenters now.

Being a recent subscriber to Adbusters, I wouldn't want to, for a second, imply that it requires a voice of reason, or for another second, imply that I am that voice of reason, however, having read the Person of the Year piece, I feel compelled to comment that in a world in which the economy is the mess that it is--with so many people being affected by job loss--if they haven't already been in some sort of financial calamity, a world that seems to create an environment in which only the very rich and the very poor seem to be thought of, where only seniors and very young people, say the youth, seem to be considered priorities--not to imply that they aren't important-- while the rest of us suffer and have to make way for them despite efforts made to move forward, progress or make a difference in a way that sustains a quality of life that will enable us to actually be more helpful and less of a burden to society as a whole; a world in which people are applauded and praised for lying, cheating, stealing, pilfering things that aren't theirs to pilfer, invading privacy, disregarding those of us who are capable, competent, able and consider ourselves individuals who respect our freedom to write, speak, be opinionated; in other words, a world that is filled with fakes, actors or actresses, or wannabe actors or actresses, pretentious people who flaunt their wealth one minute, while turning around and pretending to care about people the next, and I'm not only referring to the world's wealthiest or semi-wealthiest people, and I'm not referring to every actor or actress, or every person. I'm referring to all those people who are that way and pretend they aren't. They could even, for all I know, be among the Adbusters' subscribers, or they could work at one of many non-profit organizations. Let's face it, how is someone like Bill Clinton--with all the wealth that he has, or someone like Bill Gates, with all his wealth, any different from the Person of the Year, in some respects? Isn't the Person of the Year just a disguise to hide behind, anyway? Isn't it just an excuse for the real problem which I've described in this comment--that being the fact that, let's be honest, we all want money and we all need money to survive and we all probably want to make money doing something we enjoy doing, so isn't there a little envy of the Person of the Year? I'm not going to lie--I am that Person--sometimes, though not in every respect. I've eaten hamburgers, I've taken a bath when I could have taken a short shower. I'm sure that Michael Moore is probably that Person of the Year, or Bill Gates, or even Barack Obama--at least sometimes. Why would Barack Obama, given his rhetoric and eloquent speeches about America needing change, move his family to the White House, essentially, a mansion that could house several homeless people during the winter who need a home? Why would Bill Clinton live in a mansion and then, go and preach diplomacy in his treks around the world? Isn't it, in part, because they are rich and they can afford to do that and also, in part, because they feel a certain sense of responsibility because the media would make a complete mockery of such people if they didn't do that with all the wealth they have, and in part, because they feel guilty and in part, because if they didn't do that, they would be paying an exhorbitant amount of taxes on the money they make--if they didn't make an effort to be philanthropic? Same with Bill Gates. He makes a lot of money. He gave $30,000,000, according to an interview he did on CNN, to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation--his own charity. I'm not saying that these people don't care--I'm sure they do, as we all surely must. If we or they didn't care on some level, we wouldn't be able to call ourselves human, but I am so sick of the dishonesty and the we and they mentality, though we are always one or the other side of that at some point. And I don't think that there should be a one world because that would be like saying that a monopoly is the answer to the world's problems--where, then, would the individual spirit be? Maybe I'll be hated, despised, loathed for writing this. The truth is, I can't afford to care. I'm not Bill Gates, Bill Clinton, Martin Luther King Jr., Barack Obama, or Mother Teresa. If I'm hated or despised, rejected or loathed for my opinion, that's like slapping freedom of speech and expression in the face. And that would be like a slap in the face of humanity, honesty and truth. It's just that, to me, I can empathize with the Person of the Year, just as I can empathize with Bill Clinton or Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton. I mean, who hasn't contradicted themselves at one time or another? Who hasn't wanted to be wealthy at one time or another? We live in a society that is based on wealth. If it weren't based on wealth, why would we be advertising? Why would Adbusters be displaying its publication on newsstands? We all need and want money for a reason--whether that reason is to sustain ourselves, our interests, our voice, or whether it's to use some of that money to help others, there is always a reason for that desire. And it's not unusual to want to make money, somehow. And if such fundamentals of society change in some drastic way, it will likely exacerbate the existing problems that the world is facing. Too much change can and probably will throw society and all its people off-balance. Is another revolution really what the world needs right now? Hasn't America and the world--distinguishing the two only for the purposes of this comment--been through plenty of changes as it is? Aren't we all sick of all the changes--changes that have led to the economic meltdown, the housing crisis, the joblessness. These are changes that were a long-time coming and how can they say that they didn't know it was coming--how can people who are paid to sit around and solve problems sit around and pretend that they are actually solving problems when they're actually making things worse? How can they even justify the kind of money they make? How can they point fingers at people who are problem solvers and aren't even paid to solve problems? How can they say that now is a good time to buy a house when only the very rich can possibly afford to buy a house at this time? How can they expect that people should have to volunteer to help those less fortunate when some of us don't have the kind of money to sustain our own lives? How can they forget about those of us who are stuck in-between--we aren't the wealthiest, the poorest or even the middle class. What about those of us who are stuck in that nebulous area that can't be defined? Always looking for work, jumping from contract-to-contract, sometimes being a voice for others when we don't necessarily want to be. Who speaks for us? Who vocalizes our needs, our desires, our goals, our ambitions, our wants? I like what I've seen and read of Adbusters. I think it's interesting, opinionated, a little revolutionary. I also think that there's something to be said for the fact that it's difficult for people to be honest because honesty is sometimes too real and in a world in which people are looked down upon if they aren't Mother Teresa or Martin Luther King Jr., or some saint or wannabe saint, they aren't exactly viewed in the best light or as shining examples. The people who do help people that are less fortunate are, let's face it, helping them so that they can learn to be self-sufficient, independent and--make money so that they can do things that money--the great enabler--enables them and us, if they and us have enough of it--to do! Whether it's to help ourselves, help those less fortunate, help the environment, help animals, help, help, help! The truth is that I embrace that I like some capitalist principles. I like that society is based on money-making. I wish that I knew how I could make more money so that I could turn that into a better world for me and for others that I think could use it--without feeling like Big Brother or Big Sister was watching over me and in charge of what I do, or of my life. I also embrace that I like some socialist principles. Either way, I'm putting myself forward as the Person of the Year--some of the time--though I don't meet every qualification that is required in that position. And I'm proud of that because I would be a liar, along with the rest of them or us--on whatever side of the coin you want to look at, or on whatever coin or dollar bill you want to look at--if I didn't admit to being that way. Some of the time. Here's to the Person of the Year--the Person who might not always be consistent, the Person who is sometimes a contradiction, the Person who wants money and wants freedom, too. The Person who, I think, to be more realistic, if the Person doesn't already have a lot of money, wants money and would probably also help people with it if the Person had it. Isn't there a little of the Person of the Year in each of us? I just have one final question about the Person of the Year--can I get paid for that position?! There are so many things I'd like to do with that money...! When can I start?? Yes, I realize those are two questions...And here's a third--who said the Person of the Year is perfect?