Canada's Hard Turn Right
Sean Kilpatrick / THE CANADIAN PRESS
A new petro state has emerged in global affairs and its extreme political behavior has unsettled both Americans and Europeans alike.
For starters, the year-old regime has muzzled government scientists who are now accompanied by Soviet-like “minders” at public events.
It has branded environmentalists as “foreign radicals.”
It has abandoned its commitments under the Kyoto Protocol to reduce atmospheric pollution and effectively has no national plan to deal with climate change.
The state’s Auditor General has accused the government of lying to elected officials and concealing the real price tag for military aircraft: An astounding $25 billion.
More than 30,000 citizens have filed complaints with authorities accusing the ruling party of committing massive electoral fraud during the last election.
The same ruling party has gutted most of the country’s environmental legislation to quicken the approval times for pipelines and other oil and gas projects.
It also proposes to sell its supertankers of petroleum to three highly corrupt state-owned corporations ruled by the Communist Party of China. All comfortably deal with dictators and human rights violators.
Although this petro pirate may sound like Nigeria, Angola, Ecuador or Equatorial Guinea, think again. It’s Canada. That’s right: The northern mining giant that shares a border with the United States. It used to be a polite place – but the country’s gone rogue over oil.
Petrolized by bitumen exports and ruled by a Conservative Party that makes the Republican antics of George W. Bush look tame, Canada has become another dysfunctional petro state in full democratic free fall.
Even one of the nation’s most seasoned political analysts, Laurence Martin, writes that the nation’s oily leaders are breaking “new ground in the subverting of the democratic process.”
The resource behind this rueful transformation is bitumen, a costly junk crude that must be mined from the nation’s northern forests or steamed from deeper deposits. The unconventional hydrocarbon, which even Big Oil describes as ugly, comes with a much higher water, carbon and energy footprint than light oil.
Since the late 1990s a bitumen boom, driven by rising oil prices and give-it-away royalties, has created the world’s largest energy and engineering project in northern Alberta, a western province home to the Rocky Mountains, cowboys, and boreal forest. As a consequence, Canada now ranks as the world’s sixth largest oil producer. Oil lobbyists dominate the nation’s capital and bitumen now accounts for more than 30 percent of the nation’s exports. Not surprisingly, the nation’s embassies lobby against carbon taxes and low-carbon fuel standards abroad with Saudi-like enthusiasm.
Canada’s ruling Conservative party now vainly describes the nation as an “emerging energy superpower.” Its leader, Stephen Harper, a libertarian ideologue who brooks no criticism, is the son of an Imperial oil accountant from Calgary, Alberta – Canada’s Houston, Texas.
Harper, who makes policy announcements from foreign capitals, is also an evangelical fundamentalist Christian with a deep disdain for science, the media and environmentalism.
Although he refuses to publicly answer questions about his religious beliefs, his political actions tell an extreme story. In recent months he stunned the country by formally declaring war against environmental critics of rapid tar sands development. Natural Resource Minister Joe Oliver, an investment banker and genuine one percenter, even dubbed opponents “foreign radicals” in an open public letter. At the same time the government reclassified Greenpeace, a civil organization established by Canadian journalists, as a “multi-issue extremist threat.”
To accelerate the approval of pipelines that would carry bitumen to the coastal province of British Columbia and onto supertankers destined for China, the federal government has rewritten every major piece of environmental legislation from the Navigable Waters Act to the Fisheries Act. It has also centralized key decision-making powers for major pipeline projects in the hands of Conservative ministers.
This broad policy change, buried in a recent documents, so shocked one columnist for the National Post, Canada’s leading right-wing newspaper, that he accused the government of “institutional duplicity” and “treating Canadians like fools.”
While government and industry PR folk spin fabrications about Canada’s environmental record (one of the worst in the industrial world), Scott Vaughan, Federal Environment Commissioner in the office of the Auditor General, reports that there are only 12 water quality stations for Canada’s 3,000 First Nations communities and just one federal water monitoring station operating downstream from the tar sands (which was, until last year, only calibrated to detect pulp mill pollution). Most of Canada’s resource extraction happens on or near First Nations land, and has long-lasting impacts on water, soil, and communities.
The data-antagonistic Harper government has so muzzled federal scientists that an editorial in the prestigious Nature magazine demanded that it was “time for the Canadian government to set its scientists free.” Harper responded by providing Soviet-like chaperones for Arctic scientists at a recent Montreal conference, much to the nation’s global embarrassment. “It’s going from bad to worse,” says Andrew Weaver, one of the nation’s top climate researchers and a critic of government scientific censorship.
Given that Canada’s prime minister and his cabinet ministers now receive a portion of their paychecks from bitumen taxes (not one petroleum cent is being saved federally), just about everyone expects the level of tension, intimidation and conflict to rise steadily in the country. And yes, you read that correctly: We’re talking about Canada.
106 comments on the article “Canada's Hard Turn Right ”
Displaying 41 - 50 of 106
Page 5 of 11
Anonymous
Every single western country is, in case you hadn't noticed. The ones that aren't, have coups or civil wars brought to them courtesy of the CIA.
Anonymous
Small correction: Not all western nations are under the power of NORTHCOM. Some, like those in NATO and the European Union, are under EUCOM, just as there's a governing COM over every nation on Earth. And the full reality is the DoD, regardless of the functions of one of its acronyms, now controls our planet, her relevant human systems, and all her natural resources.
Anonymous
well now we know what the most violent criminals in society will do if given the opportunity. hope we've learned our lesson.
Davga
I think you have mistaken cause and effect. It's not the CIA in control, the CIA works to further the interests of billionaires and multi-national corporations. The 0.1% own almost everything - particularly the media which feeds lies to the masses as another method to keep the human livestock sedated and vaguely productive.
We are under the control of a very nasty rightwing agenda which is designed to allow corporations and billionaires to continue accumulating more wealth with no concern about the lives of the 99.9% (other than that they don't make enough of our lives so miserable that there is not enough of us to revolt).
However, not all countries are under this control to the same degree. For example, Germany are doing their own thing - e.g. their 100% renewable energy drive - which does not benefit the international plutocrats.
Anonymous
So, it's a "very nasty rightwing (sic) agenda" - not flesh and blood nazis - in control of things. That's a mighty side step you're attempting. Also you said ; "For example. Germany are (sic) doing their (sic) own thing...". So, Germany is doing its own thing yet has 227 U.S. Military bases on its soil. Got anymore horseshit?
You are seriously disoriented.
Anonymous
*edit: after re-enlignment and closures - all occuring within the last 20 years, or post-Soviet Union - the actual number of remaining bases is about 60. This number still makes any notion of Germany doing its own thing stupid and/or insane.
Anonymous
Point of accuracy:
Harper grew up in Ontario, not Alberta.
Anonymous
Yeah. Alberta City, Ontario.
JenSmith
Yes, but just like his hero George W., he chooses to portray himself as a cowboy rather than an urban easterner with a silver spoon up his arse. And people are foolish enough to buy it.
Anonymous
Great article but you are wrong, wrong, wrong to include ECUADOR! Do your research on Ecuador - while not perfect, it is miles ahead of Canada in the context of DEMOCRACY.
Pages
Add a new comment