Planetary Endgame
Getty Images/ABC
Under the guidance of Evo Morales, Bolivia is one of the only sane voices at the ongoing UN Climate Change Conference in Qatar.
Yesterday, Jose Antonio Zamora Gutierrez, Minister of Environment and Water, spoke on behalf of Bolivia at COP18 in Qatar.
Of consumerism and greed, he said: "A wasteful, consumerist, exclusionary, greedy civilization generating wealth in some hands and poverty everywhere, has produced pollution and climate crisis. We did not come here to negotiate climate. We did not come here to turn the climate into a business, or to protect businesses of them who want to continue aggravating the climate crisis, destroying Mother Earth."
Of the causes of climate crisis, he said: "The causes of the climate crisis are directly related to the accumulation and concentration of wealth in few countries and in small social groups, excessive and wasteful mass consumption, under the belief that having more is living better, polluting production and disposable goods to enrich wealth increasing the ecological footprint, as well as the excessive and unsustainable use of renewable and non-renewable natural resources at a high environmental cost for extractive activities for production."
Of runaway "economic progress" milking the ecological crisis as another opportunity for growth, he said: "We denounce to the whole world the pressure from some countries for the approval of new carbon market mechanisms, although these have shown to be ineffective in the fight against climate change, and that only represent business opportunities. This is a climate change conference, not a conference for carbon business. We did not come here to do business with the death of Mother Earth betting on the power of markets as a solution. We are here to protect our Mother Earth,we came here to protect the future of humanity. The planet is not for sale, nor is our life."
Of the USA's moral ineptitude, he said: "Let's be careful of the intentions of some developed parties to make us feel resigned in front of this terrible reality, and admit the inertia and inaction of those countries that are historically responsible of global warming, sending us a message that is better to have a “pragmatic” attitude, which of course will condemn to cook planet and the extinction of the humanity."
Read the full address here.
19 comments on the article “Planetary Endgame”
Displaying 1 - 10 of 19
Page 1 of 2
Jouaquin
Hasta la Victoria Siempre, Bolivia!
Sub Text
Crude; Vulgar; Disgusting, Gross National Product
Anonymous
At first I laughed because sometimes when someone mentions the GDP I think of the gross as in "disgusting" definition. But the truth in your statement makes me realize it isn't funny, it's disturbing that we use GDP to measure the "health" of a country. America has a high GDP, how exactly is America healthy?
Anonymous
All these goods are but a drop in the ocean towards pollution compared to the pollution caused by war profiteering and the lazy stupid destructive control of the planet by the oil and energy industry, the same people in the war profiteering biz ,...also running the government..
Put in solar, tidal, and wind energy and there would be plenty of resources, if used responsibly, for all the goods, toys, furniture, etc that people could ever want.
Distribute the wealth among the populace and elevate the work of craftsmen and artist and people could have all the beautiful things that enrich our lives and still be good stewards of the planet.
BS on blaming the people for wasteful greed. We don't want or approve of planned obsolescence and fracking the planet into a waste dump. Nor are we on board with these antiquated dinosaur fuels destroying the planet when everyone knows that alternatives are abundant and doable .... but don't put planetary control of a hands of a few.
Anonymous
The endless churning out pointless oil-based goods is as damaging as any war. So why give the impression there are enough resources to meet people's greed, when there might not be enough means to meet all our needs?
Anonymous
P.S: Does not the main picture says great deal?
Anonymous
Did i say they goods had to be oil based. No. But if we had no wars and we used alternative energy to heat and power our lives and vehicles there would be plenty for any goods that we couldn't figure out how to make differently.
Multiply that with ending planned obsolescence and there would be plenty of resources for goods that wouldn't require destroying the planet and the earth. .
Anonymous
"Did i say they goods had to be oil based". Now, now, is that really the best tone to take?
MoOnUnIt
WHERE exactly do you think toys furnature and cell phones ect come from supplying the entire planet with all these things and more is completely insane and impossible to maintain there are not plenty of resorces we dont get this shit from outer space......Btween consumerism and shrinking forests and wild lands it wont be long before we are fighting over simple things like water !!!
Anonymous
And yet, you clearly bought a computer to make this comment.
Pages
Add a new comment