Adbusters Blog

CTRL + ALT + DELETE

NYC artists combat illegal street advertising.
CTRL + ALT + DELETE
Ji Lee – pleaseenjoy.com

Last month, dozens of New York artists and activists battled the clutter of consumerism in a guerrilla-style billboard takeover. Mobilized by Jordan Seiler and the Public Ad Campaign, the 24-hour direct action replaced nearly 19,000 square feet of illegal advertising with original, anti-corporate street art.

Blueprints for the ambitious aesthetic revolution took shape years ago, when Seiler found that thousands of New York’s posters and billboards were not properly licensed. Some ads, he discovered, violated bylaws that have been on city books since the 1940s.

“Outdoor advertising is the primary obstacle to open public communications,” Seiler explains on his website, publicadcampaign.com. “Through bold acts of civil disobedience we hope to air our grievances in the court of public opinion and witness our communities regain control of the space they occupy.”

Armed with paint rollers, spray cans and video equipment, activists took to the streets on April 25th wearing florescent orange construction vests. (Covertness, it seemed, was not a top priority). The mixed brigade of culture jammers — ranging from artists and architects to software developers and bio-physicists — swiftly whitewashed 126 of the offending advertisements.

Calling themselves the Municipal Landscape Control Committee, the team turned the newly-buffed billboards into multimedia art. Across Manhattan, walls that formerly peddled electronics, designer clothes and alcohol were reclaimed in the name of peace, laughter and high-fives.

For a fleeting moment, it seemed democracy itself had burst through New York’s thick clouds of visual pollution. Instead of noisy and intrusive ads, passersby freely engaged with refreshing open-source canvasses. It was an artful and symbolic warning aimed at billboard companies that unlawfully reap profits from citizen-owned spaces.

Unsurprisingly, the artistic uprising was not without casualties. One artist, two whitewashers and a videographer were arrested by New York police — one of whom is still fighting criminal charges. And, because of the city’s utter lack of enforcement, many of the same illegal ads were replaced the very next day.

Such flagrant disregard for the quality and character of public space has been met with passionate outrage across the globe. In places like Los Angeles, Toronto and Paris, creative communities are developing new ways to investigate billboards and combat illegal advertisements.

The omnipresence of insipid "buy me" schlock isn't exclusive to the world's metropolises. Indeed, the battle for a clear and democratic mindscape can be fought and won at all fronts. Visit illegalsigns.ca or illegalbillboards.org and learn how you can take back the streets in your hometown.

Support + Share

Help us spread the word. Share it online with your friends or subscribe to the print edition.

All Comments

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

I have been researching into

by Anonymous on September 01 2009, @03:38 pm

I have been researching into the effect of advertising on society and the ideas surrounding this that compare it to an environmental issue. We are surrounded by images, that are directed at us. If these images can affect us, then we should be able to affect them. The corporations pay their way into public spaces, and we don't have a choice. We are not even given freedom of speech in a so called democratic society. I performed an intervention against advertisements that express sexually explicit messages to youth (developing identities). It was a very innocent sign in comparison to the advertising that happens in the windows. Some shop assistants called their boss who was about to ring the police. I'm not sure what would have happened, but I'm guessing I would have been fined. The thing is, the messages that corporations are allowed to give to us are so unhealthy. My message expressed how brands are making an illusion that they are our way to freedom...but the real freedom comes when we disconnect ourselves from their influence. In this day and age - especially for the young developing generations (that are very influenced - brainwashed - in my opinion...and in researchers) this freedom is seemingly less and less.

Criteria forced towards us as to how we should be, how we should live our lifes.....image conscious society losing the true values of life..becoming obsessed with consumption, materialism.... belief that they will have their emotional needs filled if they have material possessions. Brands creating an identity, which we we purchase...seemingly becomes our identity.

I loved the white washed walls and the word DELETE - the reference to a computer (technology) - the spontaneous press of a button and all that was once there is gone. Its nice to have a cleaner environment, where we can think for ourselves. Although i also believe people are beginning to ignore advertisements and avoid them as much as possible - so in a way switch off....

I implore you to recognize

by Anonymous on August 15 2009, @02:44 am I implore you to recognize that at the core of our money based system there is corruption, in fact the system breeds it. The world currently has the technology to have a resource based economy and feed and educate all the worlds people, eliminate debt and drudgery, and set up a social system in which technological and cultural progress can accelerated to levels never before imagined. Please take the time to go through this information and then show it to everyone you know. http://www.thevenusproject.com/
See video
See video
The quality of life can be made souring for all peoples if we recognize our responsibility to inform others and to embrace change.

How is what these people are

by Fungible on July 27 2009, @08:16 pm How is what these people are doing any different than the guy ripping down band posters or the grandmother getting upset about graffiti? You can't have it both ways -- either public and private spaces are heavily regulated according to the mores of a bunch of faceless bureaucrats who would rather die than see their city awash in progressive street art, or artists will have to compete with corporations for access to eyeballs. And yeah, the corporations are probably going to win that one because they're a lot better at monetizing their investments, they're more organized, blah blah blah. Props to the group doing the civil disobedience in response to the corporations' illegal acts, but lets see how long it takes for the resistence to fizzle out.

I agree with some of these

by Irlanda on July 23 2009, @03:21 am I agree with some of these comments. What's the difference, or in this case, the so-called "justice"? I mean, street work from a real independent artist is obviously much more valuable to the human soul than a produced advertisement by some corporation that only plans to send destructive messages to the public. Wich leads to the core of the issue, corruption. we, the others, see all this very clear, but, there's a whole army of evil minds against a few. The real battle is in ourselves, spreading the thoughts slowly, but efficently, i think it's the only way.

"One artist, two whitewashers

by Deof Movestofca on July 22 2009, @08:28 am "One artist, two whitewashers and a videographer were arrested by New York police — one of whom is still fighting criminal charges." Makes one wonder who's pressing charges, since whoever it was/is evidently is the same person who was illegally posting the ads. "And, because of the city’s utter lack of enforcement, many of the same illegal ads were replaced the very next day." So the police were around to catch people covering up the ads, but not around to catch the people who were putting up the ads illegally? Can you say "selective enforcement"? I thought you could!

this kind of thing is

by gobeaches on July 21 2009, @07:52 am this kind of thing is difficult to stop it. The rule must be very strict so people will think about it before do something. มะเร็งเต้านม

Where could a non-New Yorker

by Anonymous on July 08 2009, @12:19 pm Where could a non-New Yorker see images of the work?

YYYYEEESSSSS!!!!!

by Anonymous on June 16 2009, @11:29 pm YYYYEEESSSSS!!!!!

de CARAMILIZE da FATty

by A Human Being on June 12 2009, @01:59 pm de CARAMILIZE da FATty aciiiiEEEACID TV reality........ .. .. . . .. . .. .

This is awesome. What’s the

by Shattergirl17 on June 09 2009, @03:32 pm This is awesome. What's the difference between art and advertising? They both attempt to deliver a message and alter the consciousness of the observer. The difference is the message that is being sent. I dunno about you, but I like this message better. :)

I saw many illegal ads daily.

by hoodiagordonii on June 07 2009, @10:58 pm I saw many illegal ads daily. If they remove them, again and again they placing it. How to solve this.

Perfect question. The

by Hmmm... on July 18 2009, @08:38 pm Perfect question. The replying posters below should have started with your question. In theory, I think the answer is that the offending advertisers should be charged. The problem of course is corruption. If some illegal posters are given a pass, while others, like the artists are given criminal charges for the same offense, we don't have equal justice under the law. If the people joined their community boards, shared whats going on, we could petition grievances. Then arrests could be made on all offenders. That would free up public space for artists to work to be commissioned by the city. Otherwise, it would take a lot of lawyers representing a neighborhood to bring a suit against a guilty advertiser and begin to effect all the advertisers practices. These illegally posting artists and adbusters have brought it to our attention in a way the news media has failed us. The artists committed civil disobedience to evoke change, good for them. Meet your neighbors, do they know where the new video camera's feed from the building goes when there's no doorman. Sticking our heads in the sand aint' helping no matter how busy we are. This is culture.

I think its awesome what

by Twyla on June 04 2009, @09:10 am I think its awesome what these artists are doing. I would MUCH MUCH MUCH rather see public art than advertisements. Don't you have to bend the rules some times to make change? -twyla

So because these ads were

by Anonymous on June 02 2009, @01:32 pm So because these ads were illegal, they removed them, and then replaced them with their own stuff, which is illegal? What was solved here?

that having 3000 plus

by Anonymous on June 03 2009, @12:16 pm that having 3000 plus advertisments shoved into our sub-concious, everyday, should have to happen if we don't want it to happen, at least these guys put there own artwork and hid a bunch of advertisements, it's more then i've ever did, but maybe that'll change.

Moving forward to hold

by Anonymous on June 03 2009, @07:52 am Moving forward to hold artists as well as corporations accountable for illegal acts.