Blackspot

Support Online Piracy

Piracy is a litmus test for authentic culture and a censorship-free internet.
Spoof designed by The Pirate Bay, the world's largest online piracy website.

The battle between online pirates and corporations is heating up. In the last few days both sides have had significant victories. The pirates have proven yet again that they have guts after a version of the newest X-Men film was released onto The Piratebay, the world's largest pirate website, before it was released in the theatres. But the corporations are fighting back in States such as France and Sweden which have passed laws that will, if unopposed, inaugurate the death of the internet dream. No longer a wild frontier, unsettled and open to future possibilities, the fight against online piracy is justifying increasingly draconian measures that will put our online behavior under the corporate-capitalist microscope. Under the pretense of monitoring whether we are downloading pirated culture, corporations have engineered a symbolic coup in which the spirit of the internet has become inverted. The capitalist bullies are taking back the playground, unless we fight back. The only way forward, toward the original dream of censorship-free communication, is to build mainstream support for online piracy based on the argument that piracy is a litmus test for authentic culture.

The French plan to lock down the Internet involves, predictably, collusion between the State and corporations. According to the New York Times, "The law empowers music and film industry associations to hire companies to analyze the downloads of individual users to detect piracy, and to report violations to a new agency overseeing copyright protection. The agency would be authorized to trace the illegal downloads back to individuals using the downloading computer’s unique identification number, known as its Internet Protocol, or IP, address, which the Internet service providers have on record." In other words, all French internet traffic will be turned over to private corporations who will sift through every website visited, email read, and late-night IM conversation had looking for "illegal downloading". If a user is caught three times, then their internet connection is disconnected, permanently. Such an audacious internet surveillance scheme would probably not have passed had it not targeted an activity few of us are willing to stand up and publicly endorse. That is precisely the reason we must do so: if online piracy is the backdoor by which control of the internet will come, then we must openly acknowledge what many of us already secretly believe -- that online culture should be free and remixable, the laws of capitalism shall not apply here.

Piracy... the word sends shivers up the spine as it evokes hungry Somali pirates seizing cargo and holding hostages. But online piracy is not the same, to make a copy is not a depletion, but a multiplication of the original. Online piracy, we should really call it online replication, is a beautiful thing for it offers an easy litmus test for authentic culture. Take, for example, two hypothetical films: one made by struggling idealistic art students and the other by a big name director backed by a major studio with a multimillion dollar budget and nationwide advertising campaign. If each film was pirated and watched by a million people we could reasonably expect that the film students would be ecstatic (without an advertising budget their film would have been doomed to the art house circuit) while the big name director would be furious. Why? Because the film students are doing it for art while the director is doing it for the money. This is, in simple terms, what I believe the political potential of piracy to be -- piracy allows us to quickly ascertain the authenticity of a cultural product. Roughly, we could say that an authentic cultural production would be one that does not suffer from piracy because the artistic goal is in line with remix culture. Let us endorse the artists who support piracy and pirate the ones who don't. In this way we will be helping authentic culture while destroying inauthentic, capitalist culture.

There is no swifter way to bring about the de-commercialization of art than to undercut the profit motive. Likewise, there is no better way to promote a blackspot culture than to actively copy and distribute the cultural productions that speak to us and the future we'd like to build. If we pirate everything, how will the artists get paid? That is precisely the point: piracy opens up the possibility of imagining new ways of being and new ways of supporting the potential of art to change the world.

Micah White is a Contributing Editor at Adbusters magazine and an independent activist. He is writing a book on the future of activism. www.micahmwhite.com

Attention: What does the blackspot mean to you? If you have something to share that will further the blackspot philosophy, write it up in under 300 words and send it to micah (at) adbusters.org.

164 comments on the article “Support Online Piracy”

Displaying 51 - 60 of 164

Page 6 of 17

Anonymous

^these issues are so much more practical and worthwhile. protesting the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 would also be helpful. it puts the security of the internet in the hands of an unchecked few. just put rupert murdock behind that desk http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s773/show

Anonymous

^these issues are so much more practical and worthwhile. protesting the Cybersecurity Act of 2009 would also be helpful. it puts the security of the internet in the hands of an unchecked few. just put rupert murdock behind that desk http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s773/show

Anonymous

I agree partly with what this article is saying, but it has - undoubtebly - been put wrongly. Piracy is great for supporting Indie culture. I'm heavily involved in the broader death metal scence, and piracy is great for the artists. They gain fans, and people who appreciate their work pay for it. And yes, piracy for big budget films, with massive advertising funds, isn't so bad. But for an industry such as gaming, designers pour their hearts and souls into games - live frugally for years to support their passon - and when their game is finally released, its pirated nine times out of ten and their - often small company - goes bust. Ironlore for example; Titan Quest was their first production, it was a great game, and 90% of people pirated it. They went broke. When games come from big companies like EA, sure, pirate. But in our current economic system (which, I might add, I strongly disagree with) people need money to survive. Fact. Before piracy becomes too cool, lets think about the little guys that are badly affected in the pursuit of their passion.

Anonymous

I agree partly with what this article is saying, but it has - undoubtebly - been put wrongly. Piracy is great for supporting Indie culture. I'm heavily involved in the broader death metal scence, and piracy is great for the artists. They gain fans, and people who appreciate their work pay for it. And yes, piracy for big budget films, with massive advertising funds, isn't so bad. But for an industry such as gaming, designers pour their hearts and souls into games - live frugally for years to support their passon - and when their game is finally released, its pirated nine times out of ten and their - often small company - goes bust. Ironlore for example; Titan Quest was their first production, it was a great game, and 90% of people pirated it. They went broke. When games come from big companies like EA, sure, pirate. But in our current economic system (which, I might add, I strongly disagree with) people need money to survive. Fact. Before piracy becomes too cool, lets think about the little guys that are badly affected in the pursuit of their passion.

Anonymous

So.. I agree. But why doesn´t Adbusters publish a pdf version of the magazine?? So we can pirate it. I´m starting to like this magazine but i can´t buy it here, in Dominican Republic. It´d be great to have a pdf version.

Anonymous

So.. I agree. But why doesn´t Adbusters publish a pdf version of the magazine?? So we can pirate it. I´m starting to like this magazine but i can´t buy it here, in Dominican Republic. It´d be great to have a pdf version.

Anonymous

The altruistic rationalization for online piracy is no different than the altruistric rationization for the "actual" piracy conducted off the coast of Somalia. Online theft is just easier to get away with and much more socially acceptable. I'm not condeming it. I'm just being honest. I'd steal flat-screen TVs from Best Buy as well if the chances of being caught were close to zero. And I might even try to "justify" it with some type of anti-capitalist rant to assuage my guilt while I enjoy my new 70 inch flat screen.

Anonymous

The altruistic rationalization for online piracy is no different than the altruistric rationization for the "actual" piracy conducted off the coast of Somalia. Online theft is just easier to get away with and much more socially acceptable. I'm not condeming it. I'm just being honest. I'd steal flat-screen TVs from Best Buy as well if the chances of being caught were close to zero. And I might even try to "justify" it with some type of anti-capitalist rant to assuage my guilt while I enjoy my new 70 inch flat screen.

Dupont

This is ridiculous. Encouraging people to steal will not make a better society, it will simply make things worse. Stealing via the internet adds to the this sub-urban sense of entitlement and reinforces the current power structure dominated by the capitalists that produce this material. “There is no swifter way to bring about the de-commercialization of art than to undercut the profit motive [by stealing].” This statement couldn’t be anymore false, you are simply looking after your own consumeristic interests, you simply want to take from society without contributing. Rather than actually changing the power structure and the ideology around this "commercialized art.” If you really want to challenge the power and hegemonic control these conglomerates have stop consuming their products, legally or illegally. By consuming their products in any fashion you are still giving them power. If you want to make a difference ignore the objects these corporations produce, period. And finally, who are you to tell me what is true art or culture? Does the director of a major studio have profit in mind when creating his art? Probably. Is it his ONLY motive? I doubt it. Does the independent artist solely want to bless our worlds with his art? Probably not. Does he want to use this film as an opportunity to be one step closer to being the major motion picture director? Is he creating "art" to increase his standing within society's social hierarchy? Maybe, I'm pretty sure he isn't creating "art" solely for altruistic reasons. I’m sorry. I agree with you that our privacy should be protected from corporate entities but I feel you have a weak argument and poor plan to protect our privacy. If you don’t want companies to invade in your space by reading your E-mails, etc, don’t give the moral authority to do so by stealing from them. No matter how you fluff your argument stealing is wrong and gives the victim (in this case the large companies) the moral high ground and the “right” to protect itself from your attacks.

Dupont

This is ridiculous. Encouraging people to steal will not make a better society, it will simply make things worse. Stealing via the internet adds to the this sub-urban sense of entitlement and reinforces the current power structure dominated by the capitalists that produce this material. “There is no swifter way to bring about the de-commercialization of art than to undercut the profit motive [by stealing].” This statement couldn’t be anymore false, you are simply looking after your own consumeristic interests, you simply want to take from society without contributing. Rather than actually changing the power structure and the ideology around this "commercialized art.” If you really want to challenge the power and hegemonic control these conglomerates have stop consuming their products, legally or illegally. By consuming their products in any fashion you are still giving them power. If you want to make a difference ignore the objects these corporations produce, period. And finally, who are you to tell me what is true art or culture? Does the director of a major studio have profit in mind when creating his art? Probably. Is it his ONLY motive? I doubt it. Does the independent artist solely want to bless our worlds with his art? Probably not. Does he want to use this film as an opportunity to be one step closer to being the major motion picture director? Is he creating "art" to increase his standing within society's social hierarchy? Maybe, I'm pretty sure he isn't creating "art" solely for altruistic reasons. I’m sorry. I agree with you that our privacy should be protected from corporate entities but I feel you have a weak argument and poor plan to protect our privacy. If you don’t want companies to invade in your space by reading your E-mails, etc, don’t give the moral authority to do so by stealing from them. No matter how you fluff your argument stealing is wrong and gives the victim (in this case the large companies) the moral high ground and the “right” to protect itself from your attacks.

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.