Blackspot

Debtors Union and Bank Strike

Momentum is building for an anti-capitalist solution to the financial crisis.

February is becoming the month of anti-capitalist solutions to the financial crisis. In an earlier post I outlined a plan for a Blackspot Debt Collection Agency that would buy, then forgive, debt. Now others are calling for a Debtors Union and some activists associated with Enric Duran are organizing a Bank Strike. Here is a quick summary of these two big ideas.

A Debtor Union has been proposed by Keith at the Pirate Caucus. Keith writes that "A debtors union is open to all who are indebted—credit cards, car loans, mortgages, student loans, medical bills etc. and once we organize ourselves we can refuse to pay and organize a mass default and force the debt to be written off, or we could decide to renegotiate the debt at a steep discount maybe twenty cents on the dollar. That will be for the union members to decide for themselves. In any event, we can take our destiny into our hands --Let’s 'bailout' ourselves, lets 'recapitalize' ourselves, lets get out of debt!" (full post)

The daring anti-bank Spanish activist Enric Duran who reached international fame by borrowing and then refusing to pay half a million Euro is promoting the idea of a Bank Strike. His organization, Crisis, has already spawned a North American Bank Strike Chapter. Here is how they explain their plan for a Bank Strike:

"We must withdrawal our support for the financial system. Everyday it exploits our debts, our savings, and our paychecks—to fund speculation, predatory lending, environmental destruction, and corporate expansion. This will be an indefinite strike which will not end until people’s debt is cancelled just as Wall Street has been bailed out. It won’t finish until the current international financial system is abolished and alternatives are created that cover people’s needs and not those of speculators."

"If hundreds of thousands of people around the arranged to stop paying their debts—and if they supported one other—they could not be stopped. If there are a many more participating in this call by withdrawing the money from the banks, this system that enslaves us would be stopped."

"What meaning would a delinquencies list have if everybody was registered in it? What strength will the seizure of foreclosed property represent if they its affects millions of people? What will they speculate with if we take all of our money out of the banks? Let’s begin this indefinite strike! Let’s withdrawal our money from the banks and put it in alternatives that don’t speculate with our paychecks! We won’t pay our mortgages and we will stay in our homes; we will not pay personal debt. Let this crisis be paid for by the richest!" (more information)

Buying debt and forgiving it, a debtors union, and a bank strike are just a few of the possible alternatives. What are your ideas for an anti-capitalist escape from this financial crisis?

Micah M. White is a Contributing Editor at Adbusters Magazine and an independent activist. www.micahmwhite.com

54 comments on the article “Debtors Union and Bank Strike”

Displaying 31 - 40 of 54

Page 4 of 6

Agave

Your analogy is flawed. You pretend as if a bank is like a neighbor offering sugar, but the truth is that a good neighbor doesn't charge 20% interest rates compounded daily (yes, people do pay that much in credit card interest rates!). It is not stealing if the money is created from nothing and then given to us at unfair interest rates. Banks create money through fractional reserve banking and their ability to resell loans to third parties. The banks are to blame, not the people who were forced to live by their unreasonable economic system. I'd have some sympathy for you if you at least professed some form of Islamic banking that didn't involve usurious interest rates. But the fact is that not so long ago all the bankers would be in prison for USURY.

Agave

Your analogy is flawed. You pretend as if a bank is like a neighbor offering sugar, but the truth is that a good neighbor doesn't charge 20% interest rates compounded daily (yes, people do pay that much in credit card interest rates!). It is not stealing if the money is created from nothing and then given to us at unfair interest rates. Banks create money through fractional reserve banking and their ability to resell loans to third parties. The banks are to blame, not the people who were forced to live by their unreasonable economic system. I'd have some sympathy for you if you at least professed some form of Islamic banking that didn't involve usurious interest rates. But the fact is that not so long ago all the bankers would be in prison for USURY.

Anonymous

You are confusing banking with the secondary mortgage market, sale of securitized loans, unsecured credit, and some misunderstood ideas about leverage. This is understandable because the media does it all the time. Unsecured credit: If you are paying 20%, you should shop your credit needs because there are plenty of reputable (mostly small independent banks) sources for credit at much lower rates. If, however, that is all you can find - then you need to stop blaming others for your own mistakes. Anyone who can only find 20% likely has a poor credit history. The history would be a result of failing to repay prior obligations - also called stealing. What would Islamic banking say about that? The money is not created from nothing. We pay fair rates to depositors who trust us to safeguard their funds - we do. Our capital is from the hard earned dollars of our shareholders all 25 of us. Most of us have our life savings invested in the bank. We do not "create money", we do leverage our capital about 10:1. This is a far cry from the SEC regulated entities that are tanking due to 100:1 ratios. Don't confuse us. Finally, the banks did not create this system - we just live within it. If you want to lay blame, look to congress. Last but not least, I don't want sympathy. Our bank is doing fine. We didn't do stupid things and we are still quite strong. Us and institutions like us will be around long after all the big banks have disappeared. You will need us and be glad we have survived. Welcome to the future of banking :)

Anonymous

You are confusing banking with the secondary mortgage market, sale of securitized loans, unsecured credit, and some misunderstood ideas about leverage. This is understandable because the media does it all the time. Unsecured credit: If you are paying 20%, you should shop your credit needs because there are plenty of reputable (mostly small independent banks) sources for credit at much lower rates. If, however, that is all you can find - then you need to stop blaming others for your own mistakes. Anyone who can only find 20% likely has a poor credit history. The history would be a result of failing to repay prior obligations - also called stealing. What would Islamic banking say about that? The money is not created from nothing. We pay fair rates to depositors who trust us to safeguard their funds - we do. Our capital is from the hard earned dollars of our shareholders all 25 of us. Most of us have our life savings invested in the bank. We do not "create money", we do leverage our capital about 10:1. This is a far cry from the SEC regulated entities that are tanking due to 100:1 ratios. Don't confuse us. Finally, the banks did not create this system - we just live within it. If you want to lay blame, look to congress. Last but not least, I don't want sympathy. Our bank is doing fine. We didn't do stupid things and we are still quite strong. Us and institutions like us will be around long after all the big banks have disappeared. You will need us and be glad we have survived. Welcome to the future of banking :)

Anonymous

Thank you, not only for your comments, but for being the president of a small bank. As you said, "the banks did not create this system," and while some are certainly abusing it, I'm glad to see that there are those who are individually invested and care for their bank and customers. I think that what we're really discussing here is the systematic basis that creates the need for a borrower/lender relationship. We have built a society where people want things, both necessary and unnecessary - a car, an education, a cup of sugar even. Not everyone is born with the advantages that make these things accessible, so they take out loans. The first problem is that people are not provided with certain necessities (education, healthcare), and so have to pay a high price for it, often for long periods of time. These things should automatically be provided - some people shouldn't have to incur debt to get the same basic level of care and education that others get by birthright. The second problem is that are also tantalized by products - overstimulated and confused to the point where we want things no matter the cost. A car, a lifestyle, we want it. I agree that people should pay for the things they want in life, and the debtor system actually helps individuals who can successfully repay the loans, because it allows them to get what they need faster and use that thing to build capital to repay the loan (a business loan, for example). But I think that people should not be tricked or seduced into desiring things they don't really want or need. For example, we should not constantly be seduced into signing up with a major bank that will give us bad rates, when you point out that many small, independent banks offer lower rates and more supportive service. Larger banks can afford more advertisements, better visibility, more locations, but that doesn't make their rates any lower or their banking practices any safer. But my question is why do you leverage your money at a 10:1 ratio, and why do the larger entities have ratios 100:1, when obviously leveraging money at a higher rate can cause serious problems? Should banks be restricted to a certain leveraging ratio?

Anonymous

Thank you, not only for your comments, but for being the president of a small bank. As you said, "the banks did not create this system," and while some are certainly abusing it, I'm glad to see that there are those who are individually invested and care for their bank and customers. I think that what we're really discussing here is the systematic basis that creates the need for a borrower/lender relationship. We have built a society where people want things, both necessary and unnecessary - a car, an education, a cup of sugar even. Not everyone is born with the advantages that make these things accessible, so they take out loans. The first problem is that people are not provided with certain necessities (education, healthcare), and so have to pay a high price for it, often for long periods of time. These things should automatically be provided - some people shouldn't have to incur debt to get the same basic level of care and education that others get by birthright. The second problem is that are also tantalized by products - overstimulated and confused to the point where we want things no matter the cost. A car, a lifestyle, we want it. I agree that people should pay for the things they want in life, and the debtor system actually helps individuals who can successfully repay the loans, because it allows them to get what they need faster and use that thing to build capital to repay the loan (a business loan, for example). But I think that people should not be tricked or seduced into desiring things they don't really want or need. For example, we should not constantly be seduced into signing up with a major bank that will give us bad rates, when you point out that many small, independent banks offer lower rates and more supportive service. Larger banks can afford more advertisements, better visibility, more locations, but that doesn't make their rates any lower or their banking practices any safer. But my question is why do you leverage your money at a 10:1 ratio, and why do the larger entities have ratios 100:1, when obviously leveraging money at a higher rate can cause serious problems? Should banks be restricted to a certain leveraging ratio?

Jacob

We need a return to fiscal/environmental responsibility. PERIOD. It's actually really simple. People need to stop being decadent, wasteful, lazy sub-humans. Self sustaining, self reliant. Be like your grandparents (w/o the racism).

Jacob

We need a return to fiscal/environmental responsibility. PERIOD. It's actually really simple. People need to stop being decadent, wasteful, lazy sub-humans. Self sustaining, self reliant. Be like your grandparents (w/o the racism).

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.