Blackspot

Ban Fast Food Near Schools

A recent study correlates the proximity of fast food to schools with the obesity of students.

I was recently driving past a public high school during its lunch break when I witnessed a troubling sight. A hungry horde of teens was streaming out the doors of the school and looking for a place to eat. A quick glance about the area revealed their limited options: a McDonald's across the street or a Taco Bell a block further away. If those two options didn't appeal, there was always the local convenience store with frozen microwavable options. I wondered about the long-term consequences of allowing a fast food “restaurant” to open within walking distance of a school. Now, thanks to the work of economists at the University of California, Berkeley and Columbia University, we have scientific evidence that fast food near schools results in student obesity. Could these findings be the beginning of a movement to ban fast food near our children's schools?

Sometimes it takes a detailed scientific study to prove what we already knew. This eight-year study looked at the weight of over three million school children and a million pregnant women. The researchers concluded that “among 9th grade children, a fast food restaurant within a tenth of a mile of a school is associated with at least a 5.2 percent increase in obesity rate” and for pregnant women “a fast food restaurant within a half mile of her residence results in a 2.5 percent increase in the probability of gaining over 20 kilos.” (full study results)

What is interesting about this study is that it provides culture jammers with a concrete, reasonable and accomplishable goal for improving the health of children. As the researchers point out, there is no discernible effect on obesity when the fast food restaurants are located further than 1/4 miles from the school entrance. We could see a substantial decrease in childhood obesity by simply moving fast food restaurants a mere 400 meters from schools.

There is historical precedent for this type of campaign. Anti-noise activists inspired by Theodor Lessing around the turn of the 20th century, for example, were successful in introducing clauses into city ordinances that require quiet within a certain distance of schools and hospitals. These laws continue to persist in the books in many cities across the States (including my own state, New York). In the States there is also a mandated “Drug Free Zone” around schools. And, according to the Los Angeles Times, LA already “has a one-year moratorium on new fast-food outlets in a 32-square-mile area of South LA.” (source)

A few vocal citizens in communities across the world can immediately decrease childhood obesity simply by stating the obvious: kids need healthy food. We can launch a movement for “Healthy Food Zones” within 400 meters of all schools. In these areas, only local restaurants that provide healthy options to children and students will be tolerated.

Micah White is a Contributing Editor at Adbusters and an independent activist. He is writing a book on the future of activism. www.micahmwhite.com or micah (at) adbusters.org

52 comments on the article “Ban Fast Food Near Schools”

Displaying 1 - 10 of 52

Page 1 of 6

Another Matt

Once wankers drive off the poor from fast food with these goofy laws, it'll gain rebel chic and yuppies and Adbusters readers will descend upon it in order to "strike the gong of freedom" as Kalle would say. If people did not like it fast food, they would not eat it. Shockingly, as New Coke conclusively proved, ads can lead people to a product but cannot make them like it. Anyone saying otherwise is merely trying to position themselves as "smart" for merely disliking a popular product. Michah and this site generally is like libertarianism- when you're a poorly educated high school student or recent grad, it's all kinds of cool. Then you grow up.

Another Matt

Once wankers drive off the poor from fast food with these goofy laws, it'll gain rebel chic and yuppies and Adbusters readers will descend upon it in order to "strike the gong of freedom" as Kalle would say. If people did not like it fast food, they would not eat it. Shockingly, as New Coke conclusively proved, ads can lead people to a product but cannot make them like it. Anyone saying otherwise is merely trying to position themselves as "smart" for merely disliking a popular product. Michah and this site generally is like libertarianism- when you're a poorly educated high school student or recent grad, it's all kinds of cool. Then you grow up.

Anonymous

I thought it was already chic for hipsters to eat fast food. Like the Comedian in Watchmen, by embracing everything under the cop-out of irony and camp, they don't have to have standards for anything, and this is supposed to be seen as profound wisdom. Banning fast food is more Communist than Libertarian, though. It is rather amazing the way this Micah White guy always posts about relatively obvious subjects as if he's just discovered them, and then calls for the most simpleminded, least thoughtful solution possible, the solution which any politician or bureaucrat would have come up with just as fast, which in this case is to ban something. Adbusters claims to be a "Journal of the Mental Environment". They're supposed to be going deeper, trying to figure out the epistemological roots of contemporary problems. Simply picking something as obvious as fast food and calling for an astonishingly stupid reaction to it shows a lazy lack of interest in ever really bothering to think about what's going on in the world. Adbusters--Listen up! Have you noticed that every time you post something you get overwhelmingly negative response? You need to take a step back and rethink whether your recent approaches have been effective or well received. You definitely need to replace a lot of your staff, beginning with Micah White. There is a need for a "Journal of the Mental Environment", but right now you are not that journal.

Anonymous

I thought it was already chic for hipsters to eat fast food. Like the Comedian in Watchmen, by embracing everything under the cop-out of irony and camp, they don't have to have standards for anything, and this is supposed to be seen as profound wisdom. Banning fast food is more Communist than Libertarian, though. It is rather amazing the way this Micah White guy always posts about relatively obvious subjects as if he's just discovered them, and then calls for the most simpleminded, least thoughtful solution possible, the solution which any politician or bureaucrat would have come up with just as fast, which in this case is to ban something. Adbusters claims to be a "Journal of the Mental Environment". They're supposed to be going deeper, trying to figure out the epistemological roots of contemporary problems. Simply picking something as obvious as fast food and calling for an astonishingly stupid reaction to it shows a lazy lack of interest in ever really bothering to think about what's going on in the world. Adbusters--Listen up! Have you noticed that every time you post something you get overwhelmingly negative response? You need to take a step back and rethink whether your recent approaches have been effective or well received. You definitely need to replace a lot of your staff, beginning with Micah White. There is a need for a "Journal of the Mental Environment", but right now you are not that journal.

Another Matt

This is just more middle-class meddling in the lives of those unable to resist. Wankers go around and see poor people doing something. They assume, because it is liked by poor people either A) They are poor because they do it or B) it must be evil because the poor do it. So they try to ban it, warn off the poor who enjoy it, and so forth until such time that rich people like it, then it gets rehabilitated in the best Soviet fashion and becomes encouraged. Look at the history of Italian food. When Italians were the low man on the American ethnic hierarchy totem pole, their food was campaigned against as being toxic, unhealthy, and dangerous. Well, now that Italians are cool to the point we have an Italian-American Speaker of the House, Italian food is a beloved American staple served to children everyday without comment.

Another Matt

This is just more middle-class meddling in the lives of those unable to resist. Wankers go around and see poor people doing something. They assume, because it is liked by poor people either A) They are poor because they do it or B) it must be evil because the poor do it. So they try to ban it, warn off the poor who enjoy it, and so forth until such time that rich people like it, then it gets rehabilitated in the best Soviet fashion and becomes encouraged. Look at the history of Italian food. When Italians were the low man on the American ethnic hierarchy totem pole, their food was campaigned against as being toxic, unhealthy, and dangerous. Well, now that Italians are cool to the point we have an Italian-American Speaker of the House, Italian food is a beloved American staple served to children everyday without comment.

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.