Seismic Revolt
There was something left unsaid in all the coverage about the powerful earthquakes that decimated Haiti in January and rattled Chile in February. Of course, we heard about the tragedy – the human tolls were covered in detail and made us acutely aware of our own vulnerability. But despite all that, no one wanted to discuss what caused these earthquakes. In an age where the materialist-scientific outlook peers into every dark corner of existence, leaving such an obvious question unasked suggests we can’t handle the answer.
It is time to confront the fact that climate change will manifest in unexpected ways, including violent earthquakes, tsunamis and volcanoes. This is the position of respected scientists. As the New Scientist magazine reports without equivocation, “evidence of a link between climate and the rumblings of the crust has been around for years, but only now is it becoming clear just how sensitive rock can be to the air, ice and water above.” Or as Bill McGuire, Professor of Geological Hazards at University College London, writes in an earlier New Scientist article, “as the balance changes between the stresses acting on the crust and the strains held within it, the result can be an increase in volcanic eruptions and earthquakes.” Within the scientific community there appears to be a long-standing belief that there is a direct, causal connection linking earthquakes to climate change.
This connection is not being discussed because our civilization is unwilling to accept the full-spectrum reality of nature’s revolt. We are like the naive soldiers who came to battle prepared for trench warfare only to find their enemies armed with airplanes. We think of climate change as “global warming” alone and prepare ourselves psychically for delayed seasons while nature hits us from below – literally – with an earth-splitting seismic revolt. And as we scramble to amass the public funds necessary for retrofitting our decaying industrial infrastructure, nature will deploy volcanic ash to block out the sun and mysterious blights to erase our crops.
Nature is in revolt against our consumer culture. The only chance we have as a species is to heed its warnings, to trust that these sudden catastrophes augur a dark future that our governments, our money and our faith in progress cannot protect us from. Nature is the source of our sustenance and may easily become the cause of our death. Unless, that is, we are willing to risk joining nature’s earthly insurrection.
Micah White is a contributing editor at Adbusters and an independent activist. He is writing a book on the future of activism. www.micahmwhite.com or micah (at) adbusters.org
56 comments on the article “Seismic Revolt”
Displaying 31 - 40 of 56
Page 4 of 6
Anonymous
I must say that the condition of the people of Haiti was something pretty much disastrous after the earthquake and the effect of earthquake extends not just to Haiti but also to the people of Chile as well as we can see that right here in the article itself. I have heard that they are asking for some insurance claims as the insurance companies, for some reason, are mankind their excuses from providing it! Anyway I do hope that this is an example of how feeble we all are in front of the nature.medical alarms
Anonymous
I must say that the condition of the people of Haiti was something pretty much disastrous after the earthquake and the effect of earthquake extends not just to Haiti but also to the people of Chile as well as we can see that right here in the article itself. I have heard that they are asking for some insurance claims as the insurance companies, for some reason, are mankind their excuses from providing it! Anyway I do hope that this is an example of how feeble we all are in front of the nature.medical alarms
Anonymous
So maybe the writing style of the article sounds a bit mystical, but some of these responses beautifully illustrate the writer's point that many people refuse to admit even a possibility that THEY could be contributing to irreparable damage to the planet.
Anonymous
So maybe the writing style of the article sounds a bit mystical, but some of these responses beautifully illustrate the writer's point that many people refuse to admit even a possibility that THEY could be contributing to irreparable damage to the planet.
Anonymous
Yeah, Climate change is certainly happening, but causing earthquakes (and in areas known for earthquakes) is a pretty big stretch. It's comments like that which stop the public from taking the rest of real science seriously.
Anonymous
Yeah, Climate change is certainly happening, but causing earthquakes (and in areas known for earthquakes) is a pretty big stretch. It's comments like that which stop the public from taking the rest of real science seriously.
z
what matters is that media refuse to address theses issues, that human actions cause significant reactions in our sphere of life. another earthquake will hit california soon, but hey, tiger is back on the green.
z
what matters is that media refuse to address theses issues, that human actions cause significant reactions in our sphere of life. another earthquake will hit california soon, but hey, tiger is back on the green.
Nik9
Of course there remain nay sayers to any argument, those with heads in sand - business as usual, prophets of gloom, and pragmatic scientists with mounting evidences pointing to instability in the Earth's systems which ever way you want to look at it.
The question of tectonics as related to human activity is considered a little here: www.niksnexus.net/weblog/2008/06/oil/
But what I find more curious than anything, is that the areas afflicted by major earthquakes and tsunamis in the last decade or so, appear to be of the same peoples that remain marginalized or left behind in the "progressive" world, whether poorer areas of New Orleans, SE Asia, or Haiti. Sure California is on the fault line with the sands of time sifting.... but I haven't seen a rich city hit yet in recent history.
There's the radical, fascinating if ludicrous idea (perhaps requiring a quantum leap of faith) of the power of human thought/belief - you feel impoverished or victimized collectively and the idea as above, so below - or like attracts like could conceivably play a role in physical reality. Or you feel powerful, wealthy, protected... and so it is manifest in form! I know, I know, hard for us privileged, consumptive consumerists to even consider such an esoteric question... just throwing it out there.
But of course there remains the fact that the kind of devastating plundering of resources, massive hydraulic engineering, abject neglect or dumping of global industrial excreta in those same areas to benefit people far above those communities might have an impact too?
Nik9
Of course there remain nay sayers to any argument, those with heads in sand - business as usual, prophets of gloom, and pragmatic scientists with mounting evidences pointing to instability in the Earth's systems which ever way you want to look at it.
The question of tectonics as related to human activity is considered a little here: www.niksnexus.net/weblog/2008/06/oil/
But what I find more curious than anything, is that the areas afflicted by major earthquakes and tsunamis in the last decade or so, appear to be of the same peoples that remain marginalized or left behind in the "progressive" world, whether poorer areas of New Orleans, SE Asia, or Haiti. Sure California is on the fault line with the sands of time sifting.... but I haven't seen a rich city hit yet in recent history.
There's the radical, fascinating if ludicrous idea (perhaps requiring a quantum leap of faith) of the power of human thought/belief - you feel impoverished or victimized collectively and the idea as above, so below - or like attracts like could conceivably play a role in physical reality. Or you feel powerful, wealthy, protected... and so it is manifest in form! I know, I know, hard for us privileged, consumptive consumerists to even consider such an esoteric question... just throwing it out there.
But of course there remains the fact that the kind of devastating plundering of resources, massive hydraulic engineering, abject neglect or dumping of global industrial excreta in those same areas to benefit people far above those communities might have an impact too?
Pages
Add a new comment