Seismic Revolt
There was something left unsaid in all the coverage about the powerful earthquakes that decimated Haiti in January and rattled Chile in February. Of course, we heard about the tragedy – the human tolls were covered in detail and made us acutely aware of our own vulnerability. But despite all that, no one wanted to discuss what caused these earthquakes. In an age where the materialist-scientific outlook peers into every dark corner of existence, leaving such an obvious question unasked suggests we can’t handle the answer.
It is time to confront the fact that climate change will manifest in unexpected ways, including violent earthquakes, tsunamis and volcanoes. This is the position of respected scientists. As the New Scientist magazine reports without equivocation, “evidence of a link between climate and the rumblings of the crust has been around for years, but only now is it becoming clear just how sensitive rock can be to the air, ice and water above.” Or as Bill McGuire, Professor of Geological Hazards at University College London, writes in an earlier New Scientist article, “as the balance changes between the stresses acting on the crust and the strains held within it, the result can be an increase in volcanic eruptions and earthquakes.” Within the scientific community there appears to be a long-standing belief that there is a direct, causal connection linking earthquakes to climate change.
This connection is not being discussed because our civilization is unwilling to accept the full-spectrum reality of nature’s revolt. We are like the naive soldiers who came to battle prepared for trench warfare only to find their enemies armed with airplanes. We think of climate change as “global warming” alone and prepare ourselves psychically for delayed seasons while nature hits us from below – literally – with an earth-splitting seismic revolt. And as we scramble to amass the public funds necessary for retrofitting our decaying industrial infrastructure, nature will deploy volcanic ash to block out the sun and mysterious blights to erase our crops.
Nature is in revolt against our consumer culture. The only chance we have as a species is to heed its warnings, to trust that these sudden catastrophes augur a dark future that our governments, our money and our faith in progress cannot protect us from. Nature is the source of our sustenance and may easily become the cause of our death. Unless, that is, we are willing to risk joining nature’s earthly insurrection.
Micah White is a contributing editor at Adbusters and an independent activist. He is writing a book on the future of activism. www.micahmwhite.com or micah (at) adbusters.org
56 comments on the article “Seismic Revolt”
Displaying 11 - 20 of 56
Page 2 of 6
Anonymous
You're right, we can't handle it.
Anonymous
You're right, we can't handle it.
dare
I'm sorry this still does not prove in any way whatsoever no matter how much you want it to, that climate change (fact) is caused by man (evidence points to it being unlikely taking into account REAL scientific data on climate change in the past, before the industrial revolution)
Peace,
dare
http://twitter.com/daremusik
dare
I'm sorry this still does not prove in any way whatsoever no matter how much you want it to, that climate change (fact) is caused by man (evidence points to it being unlikely taking into account REAL scientific data on climate change in the past, before the industrial revolution)
Peace,
dare
http://twitter.com/daremusik
B DuBois
It is ignorance of the highest order to think that the unnatural actions of man are not affecting the planet and it's climate, every action has a consequence. The bottom line is the Earth is reacting, call it global warming, biblical prophecy, climate change, whatever you want, it doesn't matter. We are at a place of global catastrophe, where our material desire and need for so called convenience has reached a tipping point, it's either us or her, one guess on who is going to win. Take a look around, 99.9% of the six billion people on this planet are contributing to polluting the air, water, and soil on a daily basis. Just how do think the planet is going to react to this? How do you react when mosquito bites you? Well imagine 6 billion of them.
The Knowmad
[email protected]
B DuBois
It is ignorance of the highest order to think that the unnatural actions of man are not affecting the planet and it's climate, every action has a consequence. The bottom line is the Earth is reacting, call it global warming, biblical prophecy, climate change, whatever you want, it doesn't matter. We are at a place of global catastrophe, where our material desire and need for so called convenience has reached a tipping point, it's either us or her, one guess on who is going to win. Take a look around, 99.9% of the six billion people on this planet are contributing to polluting the air, water, and soil on a daily basis. Just how do think the planet is going to react to this? How do you react when mosquito bites you? Well imagine 6 billion of them.
The Knowmad
[email protected]
foiaun
Of course, in spite of ones particular position/belief about the cause of climate change and any personal arguments that might exist, there remains the physical reality of the quakes. Not that most people are in a position to analyze the data, but specific references are hardly ever given. And frankly, I have to wonder if the ever popular "that doesn't prove it" position, which IS certainly reasonable, precludes one from actively looking. And this of course says nothing about information outside of academia, even if in this case the data certainly would have to be consistent measurements.
What all of this says to me is that opinion is valued over facts and reason. An expert or some other in the know may in fact have done their homework, but how is the reader supposed to know without a reference? It's fine to make this single point about data before the industrial revolution, but all comments of this type amount to VERY LITTLE SPECIFIC useful information. But as redundant and simplistic, I find it a useful psychological lesson that we continue to "dialogue" in this way when nothing is really said, even if the lesson seems to be missed the vast majority of the time.
foiaun
Of course, in spite of ones particular position/belief about the cause of climate change and any personal arguments that might exist, there remains the physical reality of the quakes. Not that most people are in a position to analyze the data, but specific references are hardly ever given. And frankly, I have to wonder if the ever popular "that doesn't prove it" position, which IS certainly reasonable, precludes one from actively looking. And this of course says nothing about information outside of academia, even if in this case the data certainly would have to be consistent measurements.
What all of this says to me is that opinion is valued over facts and reason. An expert or some other in the know may in fact have done their homework, but how is the reader supposed to know without a reference? It's fine to make this single point about data before the industrial revolution, but all comments of this type amount to VERY LITTLE SPECIFIC useful information. But as redundant and simplistic, I find it a useful psychological lesson that we continue to "dialogue" in this way when nothing is really said, even if the lesson seems to be missed the vast majority of the time.
xenophrenia
"Nature is in revolt against our consumer culture." Really? Do we get out our rattles and dance around the sacrificial fire to appease these gods of thunder now? What do we sacrifice to make them happy with us again? Nature isn't revolting against anything - it's just being nature and it's awfully self-centered to think that we puny apes that we are, are garnering any special attention from it. This is the sort of dribble that gives any movement like this a bad name. Sad.
xenophrenia
"Nature is in revolt against our consumer culture." Really? Do we get out our rattles and dance around the sacrificial fire to appease these gods of thunder now? What do we sacrifice to make them happy with us again? Nature isn't revolting against anything - it's just being nature and it's awfully self-centered to think that we puny apes that we are, are garnering any special attention from it. This is the sort of dribble that gives any movement like this a bad name. Sad.
Pages
Add a new comment