Blackspot

Rejecting Clicktivism

The way forward will not be through the mediation of the screen.

This article is available in:

The world is in desperate need of a cultural revolution. While some of us slave to produce objects we will never be able to afford, others toil to consume luxury items they do not need. Neither lives a fulfilling life, neither is happy and both play a role in the continued desecration and evisceration of the earth. Consumer society is founded in this vicious cycle that chains some to the factory workbench and others to the screens in cubicles. It is an increasingly inhumane cycle that is spiraling out of control, dragging humanity into the abyss of climate wars and cultural insanity. That much we know. But what remains unclear is how to change the situation.

One answer that has come to dominate all others is that the future of activism is online. Dazzled by the promise of reaching a million people with a single click, social change has been turned over to a technocracy of programmers and "social media experts" who build glitzy, expensive websites and viral campaigns that amass millions of email addresses. Treating email addresses as equivalent to members, these organizations boast of their large size and downplay their small impact. It is all about quantity. To continue growing, they begin consulting with marketers who assure them that "best practices" dictate crafting a message that will appeal to the greatest number of people. Thus focus groups, A/B testing and membership surveys replace a strong philosophy, vision for radical change, and cadre of diehard supporters.

It is no wonder that their campaigns soon resemble advertising: email messages are market tested and click rate metrics dominant all other considerations. In the race for quantity, passion is left behind. But with each day they find it harder to elicit a response from their "members". Soon, they hit the pitiful online-activist industry average: less than one in twenty of their members are clicking on their emails, the rest just hit delete. (It is a well-known secret within Bay Area progressive organizations that a 5% response rate is the norm.) Thus, despite their massive, gargantuan list size, they can only count on rallying a minuscule response for any of their actions. To increase click rate, they water down their messages and make their "asks" easier and "actions" simpler. Soon, the "click to sign" deception is rolled out and simply opening an email link is treated as signing a petition. And yet, while their membership list grows larger, the active portion of their base disappears. And what is worse, as well-meaning digital activists soon discover, they are being outdone by disingenuous advertising campaigns posing as true agents of change.

Thus, we find ourselves in the bizarre situation where the celebrated international climate change organization TckTckTck with 10+ million members and 350+ partner organizations – including Greenpeace, 350, WWF, OXFAM etc – is covertly run by Havas Worldwide, the world's sixth largest advertising company. Havas' clients include Wal-Mart, Coca-Cola, Pfizer, BP and the rest of the ones who are to blame.

By turning activism over to the technocrats, we've done a great disservice to the noble tradition of rabble rousing that has brought humanity every egalitarian development. We've exchanged the difficult process of engaging in real world struggles for the ease of sending emails and clicking links. And I say this knowing that digital-activists agree and a new generation are only too eager to offer their services, hawking themselves as the pioneers in the cutting-edge field of turning email addresses into bodies on the street. But we must resist their claims to expertise and their successes defined by quantity. The way forward will not be through the mediation of the screen.

Activism, when properly conceived, aims at revolution by striking at the root. It deploys an essential critique of society that cannot be resolved, or recuperated, without a major cultural shift. Each era must find and hone that critique and with persistence use it to repeatedly attack the prevailing social order. The essential critique of our generation is the mental environmentalist perspective which understands consumerism to be a plague upon the earth supported by pollution of our mental ecology by advertisers.

The future of activism is not online; it is a spiritual insurrection against pollution of the mind. And that begins with turning off our screens.

Micah White is a Contributing Editor at Adbusters and an independent activist. He lives in Berkeley and is writing a book about the future of activism. www.micahmwhite.com or micah (at) adbusters.org

60 comments on the article “Rejecting Clicktivism”

Displaying 51 - 60 of 60

Page 6 of 6

ChrissyM

I'm not sure I understand your message, for you are using technology, specifically, the Internet, to connect to all of us, the readers. Without this medium many people would not be reading this piece at all. You can downplay the importance of websites as a go-to place for social activists, but it doesn't make much sense to be posting it on a magazine's website. Micah, I always enjoy reading you, but I feel that this should be thought out a bit more. How many of us, readers of Adbusters, continue to consumeconsumeconsume more and more media via the Internet even as we read these essays which seek to inspire?

ChrissyM

I'm not sure I understand your message, for you are using technology, specifically, the Internet, to connect to all of us, the readers. Without this medium many people would not be reading this piece at all. You can downplay the importance of websites as a go-to place for social activists, but it doesn't make much sense to be posting it on a magazine's website. Micah, I always enjoy reading you, but I feel that this should be thought out a bit more. How many of us, readers of Adbusters, continue to consumeconsumeconsume more and more media via the Internet even as we read these essays which seek to inspire?

jane d

I agree with 8/23 9:14 am. Could write up a whole diatribe myself by he/she summarized it best.

[email protected]

jane d

I agree with 8/23 9:14 am. Could write up a whole diatribe myself by he/she summarized it best.

[email protected]

Katie B

At first I thought that the writer was trying to be ironic, as AdBusters sends emails promoting their current agenda and issues. But now I realize yet again that NO ONE is free from hypocrisy. Not even people who devote their lives to writing, researching and spreading the word about the current state of well, everything. This can be depressing, yet at the same time up-lifting. I mean if no one is untouched by how society and daily life infiltrates its practices and ideals then that truly does mean that we are all in this together. From the full-on activist to the secretary in Nova Scotia.
I made a mistake the other day, I bought something I did not need. Just as this writer made a mistake by not realizing who he works for and the actual benefits of the internet for social movements. Yes, things have changed. But there still is something to "power with numbers". And that will never change. Sure we might all be blind from looking at computer screens ALL DAY, but the ones who truly care will rally, and for the others the internet can serve as a damn good way to be immersed in different thought.
Everyone tends to say "I miss the good old days." Well back whenever the hell that was, they said it too. Everything changes all the time. And there is no such thing as the "good old days". Maybe people rallied because they saw a flyer, and maybe now some come because they saw it on facebook etc. Either way they care. Stop this hubris of I'm more indie than you, because I go here and you go there.
If you want people to join your cause, cut the shit and use whatever you can.

Katie B

At first I thought that the writer was trying to be ironic, as AdBusters sends emails promoting their current agenda and issues. But now I realize yet again that NO ONE is free from hypocrisy. Not even people who devote their lives to writing, researching and spreading the word about the current state of well, everything. This can be depressing, yet at the same time up-lifting. I mean if no one is untouched by how society and daily life infiltrates its practices and ideals then that truly does mean that we are all in this together. From the full-on activist to the secretary in Nova Scotia.
I made a mistake the other day, I bought something I did not need. Just as this writer made a mistake by not realizing who he works for and the actual benefits of the internet for social movements. Yes, things have changed. But there still is something to "power with numbers". And that will never change. Sure we might all be blind from looking at computer screens ALL DAY, but the ones who truly care will rally, and for the others the internet can serve as a damn good way to be immersed in different thought.
Everyone tends to say "I miss the good old days." Well back whenever the hell that was, they said it too. Everything changes all the time. And there is no such thing as the "good old days". Maybe people rallied because they saw a flyer, and maybe now some come because they saw it on facebook etc. Either way they care. Stop this hubris of I'm more indie than you, because I go here and you go there.
If you want people to join your cause, cut the shit and use whatever you can.

Anonymous

Rejecting a powerful communication tool (i.e. "turning off the screen") will only harm you. Instead we need to use the tool against those who wish to abuse it, horde it, etc.

Recent DDoS attacks on the RIAA and MPAA show the powers of quickly and informally organized activism through forums such as 4chan and ebaumsworld. While the attacks (rather counter attacks) only brought the MPAA and RIAA's websites down for about a day, it shows the power of this new form of protest, and with some serious planning, real results could be achieved.

Only way to win is hit them where it hurts, their wallets. Corporate culture depends on consumer culture. No one buys, the business model fails. By disrupting their channels to attain profit, activists can show their own collective power against these seemingly untouchable giant corporations. The course should be two-fold, educating the "consumers" and attacking/disrupting/dismantling the corporate channels to consumption.

If anything MORE people should be turning ON their screens and learning the ways of the net (seeing the use beyond paid media consumption, which is the only purpose companies involve themselves with the net). It is a free and global community. At least until corporations try to dismantle it, or find a way to buy and then charge for Wikipedia access.

Knowledge, not ignorance, is the most powerful tool. And free global knowledge is the key to winning the war.

Anonymous

Rejecting a powerful communication tool (i.e. "turning off the screen") will only harm you. Instead we need to use the tool against those who wish to abuse it, horde it, etc.

Recent DDoS attacks on the RIAA and MPAA show the powers of quickly and informally organized activism through forums such as 4chan and ebaumsworld. While the attacks (rather counter attacks) only brought the MPAA and RIAA's websites down for about a day, it shows the power of this new form of protest, and with some serious planning, real results could be achieved.

Only way to win is hit them where it hurts, their wallets. Corporate culture depends on consumer culture. No one buys, the business model fails. By disrupting their channels to attain profit, activists can show their own collective power against these seemingly untouchable giant corporations. The course should be two-fold, educating the "consumers" and attacking/disrupting/dismantling the corporate channels to consumption.

If anything MORE people should be turning ON their screens and learning the ways of the net (seeing the use beyond paid media consumption, which is the only purpose companies involve themselves with the net). It is a free and global community. At least until corporations try to dismantle it, or find a way to buy and then charge for Wikipedia access.

Knowledge, not ignorance, is the most powerful tool. And free global knowledge is the key to winning the war.

Anonymous

The way the revolution can begin is by largescale action that while not entirely rational at-least starts the proverbial ball rolling in the correct direction. Facebook, Twitter, Verizon, Sprint, ABC, NBC, CNN, FOX...these corporations and mediums need to be destroyed or at-least their signals and capabilities need to be neutralized for a short period of time.

Imagine if for one day no one in America had Internet or phone connectivity. Imagine how wonderful that might be.

Isn't it obvious to you that we're powerless against corporation. Grassroot activism and protest does absolutely nothing but give us minor successes and stroke our egos and tell us that we're doing something worthwhile, but in reality we aren't, we're wasting our time. Have we had any major activist successes in the past decade that have radically altered the course of corporate governance, cultural norms, etc...no. And if you disagree with me just go turn on the TV, watch the news, watch an advertisement, etc, and you'll quickly come to your senses.

We need to think on a massive scale, the times call for it.

If anyone has any ideas thoughts complaints etc, I would love to talk with you. Obviously the comment section on an opnely accesible website such as adbusters is not the place, but reply if interested.

Regards,

Alejandro
Rio, Brazil

Anonymous

The way the revolution can begin is by largescale action that while not entirely rational at-least starts the proverbial ball rolling in the correct direction. Facebook, Twitter, Verizon, Sprint, ABC, NBC, CNN, FOX...these corporations and mediums need to be destroyed or at-least their signals and capabilities need to be neutralized for a short period of time.

Imagine if for one day no one in America had Internet or phone connectivity. Imagine how wonderful that might be.

Isn't it obvious to you that we're powerless against corporation. Grassroot activism and protest does absolutely nothing but give us minor successes and stroke our egos and tell us that we're doing something worthwhile, but in reality we aren't, we're wasting our time. Have we had any major activist successes in the past decade that have radically altered the course of corporate governance, cultural norms, etc...no. And if you disagree with me just go turn on the TV, watch the news, watch an advertisement, etc, and you'll quickly come to your senses.

We need to think on a massive scale, the times call for it.

If anyone has any ideas thoughts complaints etc, I would love to talk with you. Obviously the comment section on an opnely accesible website such as adbusters is not the place, but reply if interested.

Regards,

Alejandro
Rio, Brazil

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.