Blackspot

MySpacing Facebook

What will it take for Facebook to lose its cool?

For the third time, a groundswell of outrage is rising against Facebook's commercialization of friendship. The anti-Facebook movement began in 2007 with their introduction of "Beacon," a feature that gave external commercial websites private information about logged in users for the purposes of targeted advertising. Shocked users launched online petitions, posted angry status updates and filed a class action lawsuit. Officially, Facebook capitulated and Beacon was abandoned nine months ago. But then, only three months after their apparent concession, Facebook committed what has come to be known as "Facebook’s Greatest Betrayal": they retroactively changed their privacy policy, publicly revealing the formally private information of its 400 million members. Again, users got angry and protested but CEO Zuckerberg didn't budge and opposition effectively died. Now, believing that its users have been forced into submission, Facebook has gone for the kill -- reinventing Beacon in its most sinister form.

Deceptively known as "social plug-ins," Facebook's new system for giving commercial websites access to your personal information is to scatter "I like" buttons around the web. These buttons are ostensibly to allow users to identify what they like on the Internet. But the real benefit for the fat-cats at Facebook is the lucrative deals with corporate websites they stand to make because these buttons will give Facebook the ability to grant certain, undisclosed sites access to your Facebook information without your prior consent. If the "like button" is on a site, and you are a Facebook user, then your information will be transmitted automatically to these chosen sites. Your profile, the names of your friends, your favorite books and more will be used to sell you junk. All that data you entered into Facebook has become a goldmine for hungry advertisers looking to "personalize" their ads and Zuckerberg stands to make a mint.

Facebook has irrevocably tarnished its reputation in its bald pursuit of money. It has cashed in on its former reputation as a cool, hip online hangout and is now just another MySpace — a corporate-owned digital swamp of advertising. And while you may expect another round of anger, this time the reaction is eerily different. Past protests were done under the assumption that Facebook was our community and that it could be changed by our demands. But now that myth is shattered and the realization is dawning that the best tactic is not calls for reform but uncooling.

With more and more people coming to the quietly indignant realization that Facebook is lame like Myspace, the site is facing inevitable decline. And as a growing percentage of the site starts to log out, we will see the emergence of a new social networking platform built on non-commercial principles for the benefit of friendship and not consumerism.

Micah White is a Contributing Editor at Adbusters and an independent activist. www.micahmwhite.com or micah (at) adbusters.org

156 comments on the article “MySpacing Facebook”

Displaying 51 - 60 of 156

Page 6 of 16

Neil Hopkins

Of course, one coudl just not use the "I like" features and utilise Facebook etc for communication between social groups or far-flung friends/relatives...

Neil Hopkins

Of course, one coudl just not use the "I like" features and utilise Facebook etc for communication between social groups or far-flung friends/relatives...

Anonymous

After reading this article, I'm left thinking (in lack of better words) "well... no shit." This (d)evolution of mere "social networking" to corporate target advertising is completely predictable of modern capitalism (Myspace, Facebook, etc.). Private information is being sold as profit and the numbed masses that seek to "network" "socially" within the hyperreality of cyberspace will either 1)continue using or 2)seek in vain for the next contemporary, "cool" hangout online. (Because disconnecting is totally out of the question right...)

We need to understand why society has created an interface with hundreds of millions of users dwelling behind the screen and live in a social fantasy. (Do we really know the online "friend"? Is there any substantial socializing being engaged or is it all mere stimulation with the visage of conversation? What impacts is this unreality having upon our actual lives?)... these questions are rather elementary compared to the required psychoanalytical/economical understanding but hopefully you get my point.

The problem I have with this article is its purpose that social networks will emerge that are not infatuated with capitalistic values but rather "benefit friendship and not consumerism." First of all, it would be difficult (to say the least) for a social network site to not profit in some way (advertising, charging, etc) and reach the same mass scale that would be needed to off set corporate giants. Secondly, it merely supports the status quo of phantasmic virtual reality and not actuality.

Anonymous

After reading this article, I'm left thinking (in lack of better words) "well... no shit." This (d)evolution of mere "social networking" to corporate target advertising is completely predictable of modern capitalism (Myspace, Facebook, etc.). Private information is being sold as profit and the numbed masses that seek to "network" "socially" within the hyperreality of cyberspace will either 1)continue using or 2)seek in vain for the next contemporary, "cool" hangout online. (Because disconnecting is totally out of the question right...)

We need to understand why society has created an interface with hundreds of millions of users dwelling behind the screen and live in a social fantasy. (Do we really know the online "friend"? Is there any substantial socializing being engaged or is it all mere stimulation with the visage of conversation? What impacts is this unreality having upon our actual lives?)... these questions are rather elementary compared to the required psychoanalytical/economical understanding but hopefully you get my point.

The problem I have with this article is its purpose that social networks will emerge that are not infatuated with capitalistic values but rather "benefit friendship and not consumerism." First of all, it would be difficult (to say the least) for a social network site to not profit in some way (advertising, charging, etc) and reach the same mass scale that would be needed to off set corporate giants. Secondly, it merely supports the status quo of phantasmic virtual reality and not actuality.

Anonymous

to make money off a site you dont need to sell people info, thats why there's ads, to make money. So there could be a site concerned with the friend ship aspect but it would probably be loaded with ads..

Anonymous

to make money off a site you dont need to sell people info, thats why there's ads, to make money. So there could be a site concerned with the friend ship aspect but it would probably be loaded with ads..

Anonymous

Whether it's going on a bike ride or spending two years in a cabin at Walden Pond, take an actual friend with you and I guarantee you will learn more about that person then any superficial wall post will tell you.

Anonymous

Whether it's going on a bike ride or spending two years in a cabin at Walden Pond, take an actual friend with you and I guarantee you will learn more about that person then any superficial wall post will tell you.

Anonymous

I'm glad to be aware of this, and have shared the link to the article on Facebook.

As long as I remain on Facebook, and until I learn otherwise, I'm going to "unlike" things previously "liked" and be sure not to "like" anything in the future.

Anonymous

I'm glad to be aware of this, and have shared the link to the article on Facebook.

As long as I remain on Facebook, and until I learn otherwise, I'm going to "unlike" things previously "liked" and be sure not to "like" anything in the future.

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.