Blackspot

MySpacing Facebook

What will it take for Facebook to lose its cool?

For the third time, a groundswell of outrage is rising against Facebook's commercialization of friendship. The anti-Facebook movement began in 2007 with their introduction of "Beacon," a feature that gave external commercial websites private information about logged in users for the purposes of targeted advertising. Shocked users launched online petitions, posted angry status updates and filed a class action lawsuit. Officially, Facebook capitulated and Beacon was abandoned nine months ago. But then, only three months after their apparent concession, Facebook committed what has come to be known as "Facebook’s Greatest Betrayal": they retroactively changed their privacy policy, publicly revealing the formally private information of its 400 million members. Again, users got angry and protested but CEO Zuckerberg didn't budge and opposition effectively died. Now, believing that its users have been forced into submission, Facebook has gone for the kill -- reinventing Beacon in its most sinister form.

Deceptively known as "social plug-ins," Facebook's new system for giving commercial websites access to your personal information is to scatter "I like" buttons around the web. These buttons are ostensibly to allow users to identify what they like on the Internet. But the real benefit for the fat-cats at Facebook is the lucrative deals with corporate websites they stand to make because these buttons will give Facebook the ability to grant certain, undisclosed sites access to your Facebook information without your prior consent. If the "like button" is on a site, and you are a Facebook user, then your information will be transmitted automatically to these chosen sites. Your profile, the names of your friends, your favorite books and more will be used to sell you junk. All that data you entered into Facebook has become a goldmine for hungry advertisers looking to "personalize" their ads and Zuckerberg stands to make a mint.

Facebook has irrevocably tarnished its reputation in its bald pursuit of money. It has cashed in on its former reputation as a cool, hip online hangout and is now just another MySpace — a corporate-owned digital swamp of advertising. And while you may expect another round of anger, this time the reaction is eerily different. Past protests were done under the assumption that Facebook was our community and that it could be changed by our demands. But now that myth is shattered and the realization is dawning that the best tactic is not calls for reform but uncooling.

With more and more people coming to the quietly indignant realization that Facebook is lame like Myspace, the site is facing inevitable decline. And as a growing percentage of the site starts to log out, we will see the emergence of a new social networking platform built on non-commercial principles for the benefit of friendship and not consumerism.

Micah White is a Contributing Editor at Adbusters and an independent activist. www.micahmwhite.com or micah (at) adbusters.org

156 comments on the article “MySpacing Facebook”

Displaying 41 - 50 of 156

Page 5 of 16

Anonymous

I can't understand why anyone would ever want to use these social networking sites anyway. If you don't have my email address, phone number, mailing address, or favorite local bar, that's not an accident. I just don't want to hear from you.

Anonymous

I can't understand why anyone would ever want to use these social networking sites anyway. If you don't have my email address, phone number, mailing address, or favorite local bar, that's not an accident. I just don't want to hear from you.

Little Green Man

I say something to a similar effect, although far less polite. Good to see plenty of other sociopaths like myself around.

Little Green Man

I say something to a similar effect, although far less polite. Good to see plenty of other sociopaths like myself around.

The lecturer

The lecturer on evolution had been going on for nearly two hours Lapel Pin. then he started again, and said he:"Let me ask the evolutionist a question --- if we had tails like a baboon, where are they?""I'll venture an answer, " said an old lady. "We have worn them off sitting here so long. forklift".

The lecturer

The lecturer on evolution had been going on for nearly two hours Lapel Pin. then he started again, and said he:"Let me ask the evolutionist a question --- if we had tails like a baboon, where are they?""I'll venture an answer, " said an old lady. "We have worn them off sitting here so long. forklift".

NB

The issue with trying to get rid of facebook is that in some respects it is generally very useful - it didn't become popular by itself. For example the capacity to share digital photos with friends and family on the other side of the world is very rewarding. I have a lot of friends living in different parts of Europe and Canada but I can still share my photos with them all very easily.

I agree that there is something very dishonest about the way facebook conducts their business however. It's likely on its way out as twitter gains in popularity - I still haven't gotten into that but can someone tell me if it's any better (ethically)?

NB

The issue with trying to get rid of facebook is that in some respects it is generally very useful - it didn't become popular by itself. For example the capacity to share digital photos with friends and family on the other side of the world is very rewarding. I have a lot of friends living in different parts of Europe and Canada but I can still share my photos with them all very easily.

I agree that there is something very dishonest about the way facebook conducts their business however. It's likely on its way out as twitter gains in popularity - I still haven't gotten into that but can someone tell me if it's any better (ethically)?

Anonymous

I am in advertising for a sports website - 2 in fact. A surf and snowboard site. Without advertising, we would have to charge users for access to our beach and mountain webcams and forecasts.

The chicken or the egg people - which came first is no longer relevant. Its 'which would you prefer to digest'...

An advertising free website, where users pay for information. Or a free interface, but hey you gotta tolerate some people wanting you to buy their shyte.

Either way you must all understand that a large site, regardless of genre needs people to host, maintain, upload and ensure content is regular. This is a full time job and requires capital to pay its employees. No money = no site. No site = no information. No information means = ??? In our case it means you pay gas to drive 90 miles to the nearest beach only to find you wasted a tank of gas cause the surf is flat. So we are therefore offering a service.

Make no mistakes, Facebook is offering all its users a service. Stop whinging and get on with it. Don't like it = don't use it :-P

Anonymous

I am in advertising for a sports website - 2 in fact. A surf and snowboard site. Without advertising, we would have to charge users for access to our beach and mountain webcams and forecasts.

The chicken or the egg people - which came first is no longer relevant. Its 'which would you prefer to digest'...

An advertising free website, where users pay for information. Or a free interface, but hey you gotta tolerate some people wanting you to buy their shyte.

Either way you must all understand that a large site, regardless of genre needs people to host, maintain, upload and ensure content is regular. This is a full time job and requires capital to pay its employees. No money = no site. No site = no information. No information means = ??? In our case it means you pay gas to drive 90 miles to the nearest beach only to find you wasted a tank of gas cause the surf is flat. So we are therefore offering a service.

Make no mistakes, Facebook is offering all its users a service. Stop whinging and get on with it. Don't like it = don't use it :-P

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.