Blackspot

Insurrection Debated

Insurrection or revolution?

A debate whose outcome may have profound significance for activism is simmering at the edges of the Left. What makes this a squabble worth attending to is that both sides seem equally matched: their theorists are brilliant, their proponents are passionate and their networks are distributed. And at the center of the debate is a question of vital importance: insurrection or revolution.

Insurrectionary anarchism is rarely talked about because it pushes the boundaries of political good taste. The few authors who do openly promote the movement are often jailed. In 1977, for example, Alfredo M. Bonanno was imprisoned for 18 months in Italy for writing Armed Joy. Thus insurrectionary anarchism has traditionally been pushed to the margins of political debate and ignored … until now.

Most of us are aware of the revolutionary model that relies on a mass movement of disaffected people storming the gates of power and seizing control in an organized manner. This revolutionary model exists in opposition to the chaotic, spontaneous and violent impulse underlying insurrectionary anarchism. And usually, the debate is over before it begins and revolutionary praxis wins by default.

But with the publication of The Coming Insurrection and the arrest of the alleged author of the text insurrectionary anarchism is picking up a readership. Some 27,000 copies have been sold in France and more are being purchased every day through Amazon in the States. It has even inspired additional tracts such as Preoccupied: The Logic of Occupation. With insurrectionary anarchism finally reaching a wide audience, a debate among radical political theorists was inevitable.

The first signs of this discussion can be found on Znet in a blog entitled, “The Coming Insurrection or the Arrival of Suicidal Nonsense?” by Chris Spannos. Although Spannos disagrees with the authors of the text, his post is commendable for being one of the first to take it seriously enough to argue with on a philosophical basis. I expect that we will see a growing number of thinkers weigh in on the question of how to carry out the overthrow.

I believe the debate over the merits of The Coming Insurrection can only lead us in the right direction because the question it raises – how to bring about vast, systemic change – is the single most important question we ought to be considering. So, download a copy of The Coming Insurrection, read Spannos' critique and weigh in below with your thoughts.

Micah White is a Contributing Editor at Adbusters and an independent activist. He is writing a book on the future of activism. www.micahmwhite.com or micah (at) adbusters.org

52 comments on the article “Insurrection Debated”

Displaying 11 - 20 of 52

Page 2 of 6

Dks

I can't wait for this book my friend. I think we are on the same page, time for a new chapter P.S every message board/ comment area Make sure you put up a link to "The Coming Insurrection"

Dks

I can't wait for this book my friend. I think we are on the same page, time for a new chapter P.S every message board/ comment area Make sure you put up a link to "The Coming Insurrection"

Anonymous

What is "insurrection" good for without organization and vision behind it to replace the old society with something new? In some ways, I think this is a false dichotomy. We need spontaneous actions and people willing to go toe-to-toe with police and bosses. But we also desperately need organizations and counter-institutions capable of replacing the existing society. Personally, I much prefer Spannos' easily understandable defense of sensible organization to groups that suggest that disrupting well-intentioned radicals organizing is somehow good or necessary political practice. Good piece, Chris Spannos! I hope more people read it and move away from some of the macho posturing that has become so common in the anarchist scene, with talk of "ending civilization", disrupting leftist organization, etc.

Anonymous

What is "insurrection" good for without organization and vision behind it to replace the old society with something new? In some ways, I think this is a false dichotomy. We need spontaneous actions and people willing to go toe-to-toe with police and bosses. But we also desperately need organizations and counter-institutions capable of replacing the existing society. Personally, I much prefer Spannos' easily understandable defense of sensible organization to groups that suggest that disrupting well-intentioned radicals organizing is somehow good or necessary political practice. Good piece, Chris Spannos! I hope more people read it and move away from some of the macho posturing that has become so common in the anarchist scene, with talk of "ending civilization", disrupting leftist organization, etc.

Anonymous

This debate seems based upon a misunderstanding of the meaning of insurrection and revolution. A revolution in the political, economic, and social order is the end not the means. Insurrection, that is an uprising against the present order, can not exist without a revolutionary populace. Global insurrection may be the inevitable result of the final collapse of global capitalism, but it makes the revolution, it isn't the revolution itself. Insurrectionary action without popular political action is a recipe for suicide and the marginalization of any radical movement. If you don't believe me look at the history of the militant left in the late 1960s and 1970s.

Anonymous

This debate seems based upon a misunderstanding of the meaning of insurrection and revolution. A revolution in the political, economic, and social order is the end not the means. Insurrection, that is an uprising against the present order, can not exist without a revolutionary populace. Global insurrection may be the inevitable result of the final collapse of global capitalism, but it makes the revolution, it isn't the revolution itself. Insurrectionary action without popular political action is a recipe for suicide and the marginalization of any radical movement. If you don't believe me look at the history of the militant left in the late 1960s and 1970s.

Anonymous

You pathetic mine numbed self absorbed robots. Your psychobable disertaions are free entertainment for the true soldiers of change. Plans are in place, the time is soon. Just a few more "moves" need to occur. The timed fuse has been fired and is running it's course. A new day is at hand. Gun and ammo sales are at an all time high. America is soon to be transformed BACK to it's roots. And you and yours will have no place in this reformation. Your ilk is now an endangered species, soon to extinct.

Anonymous

You pathetic mine numbed self absorbed robots. Your psychobable disertaions are free entertainment for the true soldiers of change. Plans are in place, the time is soon. Just a few more "moves" need to occur. The timed fuse has been fired and is running it's course. A new day is at hand. Gun and ammo sales are at an all time high. America is soon to be transformed BACK to it's roots. And you and yours will have no place in this reformation. Your ilk is now an endangered species, soon to extinct.

Anonymous

you sound like someone fun who i want to hang out with and live with in a post-revolutionary society. real friendly, understanding, looking to work with people, non-exclusionary, etc. anyways, glad to hear that there are still nice people in the world.

Anonymous

you sound like someone fun who i want to hang out with and live with in a post-revolutionary society. real friendly, understanding, looking to work with people, non-exclusionary, etc. anyways, glad to hear that there are still nice people in the world.

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.