Adbusters

Tactical Turning Point

We innovate spontaneously - we play jazz.

JESUS G. PASTOR

Hey you nimble dreamers, occupiers, believers,

Last May 15, a hundred thousand indignados in Spain seized the squares across their nation, held people’s assemblies and catalyzed a global tactical shift that birthed Occupy Wall Street four months later. Our movement outflanked governments everywhere with a thousand encampments in large part because no one was prepared for Occupy’s magic combination of Spain’s transparent consensus-based acampadas with the Tahrir-model of indefinite occupation of symbolic space. Now exactly a year later, a big question mark hangs over our movement because it is clear that the same tactics may never work again.

Spring re-occupations have largely failed here in North America. The May Day General Strike was stifled by aggressive, preemptive policing that neutralized Occupy’s signature moves. In light of these challenges, Saturday’s May 12 rebirth of the indignados could be a tactical turning point.

Across the world, authorities are using “lawfare” to piecemeal outlaw any tactic that we used last year. In Spain, there is an attempt to criminalize the use of the internet to catalyze nonviolent protests and occupations. The International Business Times reports that this is part of a larger European move to “punish those who use social media and instant messaging to organize and co-ordinate street protests.” Canada wants to ban wearing masks at “unlawful assemblies,” a legal designation often used to disperse nonviolent protesters. Meanwhile Germany is taking a more direct route: they have simply issued a decree “banning” the Blockupy anti-bank protest in Frankfurt. As in the U.S., when outlawing free speech and the right to assembly doesn’t work, authorities are increasingly using brutal, paramilitary force.

The power of Occupy lies in its ability to harness the collective intelligence of our leaderless movement to tactically innovate. We move at viral speed – always one step ahead. “Fight, fail, fight again, fail again, fight again… till victory.” When one tactical constellation fails, we innovate spontaneously – we play jazz.

Across the world, indignados are preparing for a big blast on Saturday, May 12. Some, like Occupy London, are planning to retake the squares and set up encampments. Others have totally new tactics in mind. Whatever happens, let’s learn from the indignados with an eye towards our Camp David inspired May 18 #LAUGHRIOT and the global convergence on Chicago to confront NATO

Let’s be humble … let’s “fall in love with hard and patient work” – and keep in mind that this is all just the beginning.

for the wild,
Culture Jammers HQ

OccupyWallStreet.org / Tactical Briefing #29, #30, #31 / Be present on May 12 and on May 18 spark the #LAUGHRIOT then swarm Chicago.

120 comments on the article “Tactical Turning Point”

Displaying 61 - 70 of 120

Page 7 of 12

Anonymous

Yes, mostly agree that this kind language is uncalled for but - give the nature of issue - the limited use of such words should have a place.

Anonymous

One way to reduce profit and increase wages might be to ensure that in any endeavor that majority of the income goes to the people who actually do the work. This might reduce available work but it help get us beyond the delusion of work in an automated age.

Anonymous

If workers, who do the actual work, were really paid well instead of a few pennies, millions of people would be able to spend, buy, invent, be easily educated, buy services, travel, participate, etc. and the economy would be awesome.

But instead we have hundreds of thousands of people working for a corporation, living in poverty. and one guy at the top putting all the profits into an off shore bank account, or buying another huge corporation and parting it out and selling it off while throwing workers in the toilet, moving companies overseas, or killing off the competition with cut throat prices like Walmart.

AND
Buying government to turn laws against workers, steal pensions, medical money, and safety net allotments, also stealing taxpayer built institutions for pennies on the dollars and selling these same service for a high high profit. And the big daddy of all, buying into the for profit WAR BIZ, a guaranteed money maker thanks to crooks running what was our government

Anonymous

You lunatic, "profit" means accumulating more leverage over the wealth of society, proportionate to everyone else. We can't all profit--that would just be inflation. More to the point, we can't all fit into the liberal dream of succeeding in the capitalist framework: its structure cannot help but create winners and losers. Forget about redistributing profit--we have to abolish it and put a more meaningful organizing principle for human life in its place. Some people call this anarchism--call it what you will, but tiny reforms are even less realistic than total revolution nowadays.

Anonymous

Whining in LA about occupy costin 4.6 million. SFW, that's better than money wasted on the Pentagon. It was less expensive than the billions that the LA riots costs.

nabarreria

You all should stop the word Revolution in vain, you are insulting all the ones that have fought and have lost their lives along history, the idignados where just 2 years ago the acomodados, and they will go home getting a few crumbs, occupy London is a total disaster, you all are ignoring hundreds of years and dynamics of organisation and action against capitalism, against injustice and oppression, you are the iluminados who are going to sell us all taxing the reach instead of abolishing property (theft) and redistributing wealth, if you are going to speak about revolution next time make sure you put a few chopped heads on the table first if not go home and play with your new iPhone

Anonymous

The business inquisition. Its a new inquisition fueled by business. They call it austerity, but its an automated with-the-mother's-milk inquisition. Why should coercion be preserved? The demand needs to be for less coercive more conscious society.

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.