Adbusters

TACTICAL BRIEFING #19

Our Existential Moment.

This article is available in:

Hey jammers, dreamers, believers,

Here is a testimony from the streets of New York:

Lost my stuff, including power cord for my laptop, in the raid, something or someone cleared out my bank account, and it's raining. I could just write a country song. I'll tell you this: the resolve is still here. People I talk to are a healthy mixture of rage, comedy, resolve, and excitement. Also exhaustion. Maybe the raid was the best thing that could happen? I worry about the inevitable suffering that will occur in the cold now, and how it will be used to clear any encampment again. But there must be something like a people's library and kitchen. A physical heart. More soon. Must find money and charge my phone. Winning at last, winning at last, thank God Almighty, we are winning at last…

Our movement is living through an existential, make-or-break moment.

This is a tactical way of looking at it:

When Tunisia rose up, Ben Ali scoffed … when young people occupied Tahrir Square, Mubarak resorted to paternalism and then mob violence … in Syria, Assad's troops fire daily into the crowds. And on Tuesday, a military style assault on Zuccotti Park – news blackouts, tear gas, closed airspace, an LRAD "sound cannon" – was carried out in the dead of night to take out our movement's spiritual home.

For many weeks we had a kind of magic going for us … we held the high ground … we stuck doggedly to our Gandhian ways and blindsided the cynical world with our optimism, our camaraderie, our nonviolence, our determination to forge a different kind of future. With nothing more than twinkling fingers, mic checks, mutual respect, and hope for the future, we sparked a global democracy moment the likes of which the world had not seen since 1968.

But New York's billionaire Mayor decided to snuff us out. We wanted a Tahrir Moment, an American Spring, and he attacked us in the middle of the night while we slept. These kinds of attacks on peaceful protestors did not work in Tunisia, not in Egypt, they are not working in Syria right now, and – wake up Bloomberg & Co! – they are not going to work in America either.

This assault has stiffened our resolve. Now begins the second, visceral, canny, militant phase of our nonviolent march to real democracy. We regroup, lick our wounds and begin our counterattack as early as tomorrow.

We will turn this winter into a training ground for precision disruptions – flashmobs, stink bombs, edgy theatrics – against the megacorps and the unrepentant 1%, a festival of resistance in the snow with, or without, an encampment that'll lay the tactical foundation for our Spring Offensive.

The bottom line is this … you cannot attack your young and get away with it!

for the wild,
Culture Jammers HQ

404 comments on the article “TACTICAL BRIEFING #19”

Displaying 121 - 130 of 404

Page 13 of 41

Anonymous

We want a more equitable distribution of wealth and the power derived from it.
We want a more level playing field.
We want to eliminate the moneylender, and not lose our earnings to him.
We want to outlaw Usury.

Anonymous

We want a more equitable distribution of wealth and the power derived from it.
We want a more level playing field.
We want to eliminate the moneylender, and not lose our earnings to him.
We want to outlaw Usury.

Anonymous

Adbusters - a Canadian organization - either fails to understand fundamental American concepts or doesn't support them. We don't have "real democracy" in the U.S. We've never had it, and by design: the U.S.'s founders realized the huge flaws in "real democracy". Either Adbusters was asleep when they researched how the U.S. works, or they want to change the most fundamental U.S. concepts.

Thus, it's interesting that you want to "outlaw" something at the same time as you seem to share whatever their issue is with our fundamental concepts.

The U.S. has a Constitution and various federal and local laws, and our system works well. Major crimes are prosecuted, and if someone thinks something should be illegal or wants aspects of some law to be changed, there are processes in place.

If you think something is usury, then you can use the U.S. Constitution's framework to change the laws. That won't involve Adbusters' "stink bombs".

For those who support some aspects of the OWS movement, compare Adbusters' ideas to the techniques I suggest:

http://24ahead.com/n/10862

My techniques are completely consistent with fundamental U.S. concepts, are much easier than camping in a park, and will be much more effective.

Maybe listening to Adbusters isn't such a good idea.

Anonymous

Adbusters - a Canadian organization - either fails to understand fundamental American concepts or doesn't support them. We don't have "real democracy" in the U.S. We've never had it, and by design: the U.S.'s founders realized the huge flaws in "real democracy". Either Adbusters was asleep when they researched how the U.S. works, or they want to change the most fundamental U.S. concepts.

Thus, it's interesting that you want to "outlaw" something at the same time as you seem to share whatever their issue is with our fundamental concepts.

The U.S. has a Constitution and various federal and local laws, and our system works well. Major crimes are prosecuted, and if someone thinks something should be illegal or wants aspects of some law to be changed, there are processes in place.

If you think something is usury, then you can use the U.S. Constitution's framework to change the laws. That won't involve Adbusters' "stink bombs".

For those who support some aspects of the OWS movement, compare Adbusters' ideas to the techniques I suggest:

http://24ahead.com/n/10862

My techniques are completely consistent with fundamental U.S. concepts, are much easier than camping in a park, and will be much more effective.

Maybe listening to Adbusters isn't such a good idea.

Anonymous

You have obviously been brainwashed into believing you have a democracy.

The voters have no say in USA. The moneylenders choose their puppet and spend enormous amounts of money to support him through their own controlled media. A poor man without personal resources to match has no chance of winning an election. There are no processes in place to correct this inequality.

It is not that someone thinks he is suffering because of usury, it is a fact that costs of things get multiplied many times over, most of our hard earned income goes to the moneylenders, and interest on interest on interest applied over and over again is the biggest part of the economy of USA.

When did you calculate what fraction of your income goes to the moneylenders? Assuming that you are a working man like the 99%, you will be shocked to discover that most of your household income actually goes to the moneylenders for home mortgage, car loan, credit card loan, the interest component of cost of bread and butter, and everything else your family needs.

In America there is no way of achieving fair distribution of wealth. The 1% refuse to share anything. A revolution is the only way.

We are trying to do it peacefully hoping that decent fair minded people will understand and change their ways.

IF WE FAIL TO PERSUADE THE 1% BY PEACEFUL MEANS, WE MAY LOOSE CONTROL, AND THE REVOLUTION WILL BECOME VIOLENT.

DO YOU WANT TO BE REASONABLE, OR WOULD YOU PREFER THAT WE LOOSE, AND THERE BE A BLOOD BATH.

CHANGE IS INEVITABLE WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT.

Anonymous

You have obviously been brainwashed into believing you have a democracy.

The voters have no say in USA. The moneylenders choose their puppet and spend enormous amounts of money to support him through their own controlled media. A poor man without personal resources to match has no chance of winning an election. There are no processes in place to correct this inequality.

It is not that someone thinks he is suffering because of usury, it is a fact that costs of things get multiplied many times over, most of our hard earned income goes to the moneylenders, and interest on interest on interest applied over and over again is the biggest part of the economy of USA.

When did you calculate what fraction of your income goes to the moneylenders? Assuming that you are a working man like the 99%, you will be shocked to discover that most of your household income actually goes to the moneylenders for home mortgage, car loan, credit card loan, the interest component of cost of bread and butter, and everything else your family needs.

In America there is no way of achieving fair distribution of wealth. The 1% refuse to share anything. A revolution is the only way.

We are trying to do it peacefully hoping that decent fair minded people will understand and change their ways.

IF WE FAIL TO PERSUADE THE 1% BY PEACEFUL MEANS, WE MAY LOOSE CONTROL, AND THE REVOLUTION WILL BECOME VIOLENT.

DO YOU WANT TO BE REASONABLE, OR WOULD YOU PREFER THAT WE LOOSE, AND THERE BE A BLOOD BATH.

CHANGE IS INEVITABLE WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT.

Anonymous

Western governments today are not businesses managing revenue and expenditures on behalf of their shareholders (the voters) and working to increase business volume (i.e. economic growth) in order to maximize revenues (tax receipts). The governments aren’t working for the shareholders (voters), even if examples like Argentina hint that a country might do well by defaulting on its debt. I don’t even think they’re working for the bondholders, at least not for the dumb sheep who end up getting shorn (“taking haircuts”).

The issue is not the deficit (yearly revenue shortfall); it’s the indebtedness (the ability of the enterprise to issue debt).

Many national governments are quasi-state bucket shops for investment banks, providing a flow of debt product to investment banks for packaging and sale–very much like the mortgage brokers who frantically signed up suckers in the free-money era so the investment banks would have plenty of mortgages to securitize, CDO-ize, and pour into the hedge funds.

Now national governments issue the debt, providing the sovereign low-risk imprimatur that allows investment banks to send debt-backed securities flooding into the market in search of the greatest fool.

http://www.usdebtclock.org/

Proposing 1% asset clock and 99% poverty clock

Anonymous

Western governments today are not businesses managing revenue and expenditures on behalf of their shareholders (the voters) and working to increase business volume (i.e. economic growth) in order to maximize revenues (tax receipts). The governments aren’t working for the shareholders (voters), even if examples like Argentina hint that a country might do well by defaulting on its debt. I don’t even think they’re working for the bondholders, at least not for the dumb sheep who end up getting shorn (“taking haircuts”).

The issue is not the deficit (yearly revenue shortfall); it’s the indebtedness (the ability of the enterprise to issue debt).

Many national governments are quasi-state bucket shops for investment banks, providing a flow of debt product to investment banks for packaging and sale–very much like the mortgage brokers who frantically signed up suckers in the free-money era so the investment banks would have plenty of mortgages to securitize, CDO-ize, and pour into the hedge funds.

Now national governments issue the debt, providing the sovereign low-risk imprimatur that allows investment banks to send debt-backed securities flooding into the market in search of the greatest fool.

http://www.usdebtclock.org/

Proposing 1% asset clock and 99% poverty clock

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.