Adbusters

Preaching High Morality to the Powerless

The moment of truth is fast approaching for Obama.

As the Arab Spring intensifies, now spreading to Spain and Greece, the home of radically democratic political thought is starting to shift outside the West. A new culture of fearlessness is settling in abroad, especially among non-European and non-American intellectuals, as evidenced by the latest piece by Indian novelist Pankaj Mishra. He writes:

"The moment of truth is fast approaching for those powerful men who preach the high morality of non-violence to the powerless. Only an American veto seems likely to prevent the member states of the UN from declaring a new Palestinian state in September. But Palestinians may rise up against their colonial overlords well before this expected rejection. And, as the political philosopher Michael Walzer points out, Israel would then confront "something radically new. How can it resist masses of men and women, children too, just walking across the ceasefire lines?"
"The tactics of young tech-savvy Kashmiris have already confused and bewildered the Indian government, whose recent actions – censoring the Economist, forcing spying rights out of BlackBerry and Google – evoke the last-minute desperation of the Arab world's mukhabarat (secret police) states. The mass movement in Kashmir, which has emerged after two decades of a futile militant insurgency and has no compromising links to Pakistan, poses, as the Kashmiri journalist Parvaiz Bukhari writes in Until My Freedom Has Come, an unprecedented "moral challenge to New Delhi's military domination over the region".
"The stage is set, then, for a summer of protests, of unarmed masses rising up to express, in Obama's words, "a longing for freedom that has built up for years". They may well meet with live bullets rather than offers of negotiation and compromise. It will be fascinating to see if Obama makes good his claim last month that the United States "opposes violence and repression" and "welcomes change that advances self-determination". Certainly, as the corpses of the Palestinian and Kashmiri Hamza al-Khatibs pile up, there will be the usual flurry of intellectual rationalisations – the bogey of Islamic terror will again be invoked. And we will witness how the "enormous mountains of tyranny" in the world's greatest democracies do not blow away like cotton."

Read the full text of Pankaj Mishra's brilliant tactical briefing at the Guardian.

[Edit: Changed the image in this post, we originally used a video still showing a man shot in the head while hiding behind a garbage dumpster. Taken from here.]

74 comments on the article “Preaching High Morality to the Powerless”

Displaying 61 - 70 of 74

Page 7 of 8

Anonymous

12.59 seems to blame the Palestinians for the fact that there are no Jews in Gaza, and then states "all of these place have had historical Jewish populations that never existed". Aside from the fact that this is not a sentence that makes sense in in English, you are right that Gaza has never had a historical Jewish population.

Gaza exists because the Palestinians who lived in Ashkelon -- Askalaan in Arabic -- were dispossessed from their lands in 1948 when Israel was created (by the United Nations,not by god) and ended up in Gaza. They -- or their children and grandchildren -- are among the 1.5 million Palestinian refugees crammed into Gaza, 80% of whose families once lived in what is now Israel. Most of the people of Gaza do not come from Gaza. They come from what is now Israel.

20% of the poplulation of Israel is from the ex Soviet Union. All you need to "return" to Israel is ONE grandparent that is supposedly Jewish. I say supposedly in a kind way, many grandparents were "discovered" to be Jewish. I personally know serveral families that emigrated to Israel with a purchased grandparent.

Israel is a murderous, racist state. It is far worse than the Crusader kingdoms that held forth in the region for some years. And who remembers them? History is not on Israel's side.

Anonymous

12.59 seems to blame the Palestinians for the fact that there are no Jews in Gaza, and then states "all of these place have had historical Jewish populations that never existed". Aside from the fact that this is not a sentence that makes sense in in English, you are right that Gaza has never had a historical Jewish population.

Gaza exists because the Palestinians who lived in Ashkelon -- Askalaan in Arabic -- were dispossessed from their lands in 1948 when Israel was created (by the United Nations,not by god) and ended up in Gaza. They -- or their children and grandchildren -- are among the 1.5 million Palestinian refugees crammed into Gaza, 80% of whose families once lived in what is now Israel. Most of the people of Gaza do not come from Gaza. They come from what is now Israel.

20% of the poplulation of Israel is from the ex Soviet Union. All you need to "return" to Israel is ONE grandparent that is supposedly Jewish. I say supposedly in a kind way, many grandparents were "discovered" to be Jewish. I personally know serveral families that emigrated to Israel with a purchased grandparent.

Israel is a murderous, racist state. It is far worse than the Crusader kingdoms that held forth in the region for some years. And who remembers them? History is not on Israel's side.

Anonymous

You honestly believe there were zero Jews in Gaza prior to modern times? Simply not true.

Despite all your talk about ethnic diversity and accusation of ethnic cleansing, the Gaza Strip is now the only area in the region with virtually zero minorities. This is the work of Hamas.

Anonymous

You honestly believe there were zero Jews in Gaza prior to modern times? Simply not true.

Despite all your talk about ethnic diversity and accusation of ethnic cleansing, the Gaza Strip is now the only area in the region with virtually zero minorities. This is the work of Hamas.

Arthur Borges i...

It makes me wax philosophically to see how the sort of polish that the current US president is adding to his Nobel Peace Prize, though.

Am not sure if the Nobel Prize Committee has any mechanism for taking back its awards and claiming a refund of the million dollars that come with it.

By the way, what has Pres. Obama done with the million?

Last I heard, US presidents weren't allowed to accept gifts exceeding 50 bucks, but that was in Pres. Roosevelt's day, when the dollar actually bought something.

Arthur Borges i...

It makes me wax philosophically to see how the sort of polish that the current US president is adding to his Nobel Peace Prize, though.

Am not sure if the Nobel Prize Committee has any mechanism for taking back its awards and claiming a refund of the million dollars that come with it.

By the way, what has Pres. Obama done with the million?

Last I heard, US presidents weren't allowed to accept gifts exceeding 50 bucks, but that was in Pres. Roosevelt's day, when the dollar actually bought something.

Anonymous

So sad that a few of the commenters on here are so high in their opinions of themselves that a false sense of superiority urges them to 'put down' another for their difference of opinion. How will the fear infecting and polluting concepts of peace end if two (or more) intelligent people continue to lose all credibility by behaving as those they condemn?

Anonymous

So sad that a few of the commenters on here are so high in their opinions of themselves that a false sense of superiority urges them to 'put down' another for their difference of opinion. How will the fear infecting and polluting concepts of peace end if two (or more) intelligent people continue to lose all credibility by behaving as those they condemn?

C. Satoyama

And yet there are things we collectively agree are unacceptable. Entrenched power never gives it back. It is only ever taken. If this were not the case there would be no revolutionaries dying in the streets and giving their blood for freedom as they have in Egypt and Palestine, etc.
"Israel" is a rogue state. Lets not pull punches here and play in the old zionist trap of including the oppressors as an equal side of the same coin. Ask a rape victim if she thinks the motivations of the rapist should be considered as equal to hers. Ask the Jews if they think the Nazis were merely another side of the same coin.
Fact is crime does happen. Injustices do exist. "Israel" is one of them and pussyfooting around it is only going to prolong the suffering.
Yes critical analysis is worthy and high-minded ideals something to strive for but on the battlefield of reality we must use a system of triage to stem the blood from where it flows most copiously.
Remember Ghandis own words on the subject:

"I do believe that, where there is only a choice between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence....I would rather have India resort to arms in order to defend her honour than that she should, in a cowardly manner, become or remain a helpless witness to her own dishonour."

Never tell a rape victim not to scratch your eyes out while you are raping her. "Israel" and all those who support the project in any way will suffer the consequences of their powerful racism. And crying about it won't win you many supporters.

No justice. No peace.

We're sticking to it.

Thanks for the effort and all but you'll have to do better with the point of your argument - whatever that is.

C. Satoyama

And yet there are things we collectively agree are unacceptable. Entrenched power never gives it back. It is only ever taken. If this were not the case there would be no revolutionaries dying in the streets and giving their blood for freedom as they have in Egypt and Palestine, etc.
"Israel" is a rogue state. Lets not pull punches here and play in the old zionist trap of including the oppressors as an equal side of the same coin. Ask a rape victim if she thinks the motivations of the rapist should be considered as equal to hers. Ask the Jews if they think the Nazis were merely another side of the same coin.
Fact is crime does happen. Injustices do exist. "Israel" is one of them and pussyfooting around it is only going to prolong the suffering.
Yes critical analysis is worthy and high-minded ideals something to strive for but on the battlefield of reality we must use a system of triage to stem the blood from where it flows most copiously.
Remember Ghandis own words on the subject:

"I do believe that, where there is only a choice between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence....I would rather have India resort to arms in order to defend her honour than that she should, in a cowardly manner, become or remain a helpless witness to her own dishonour."

Never tell a rape victim not to scratch your eyes out while you are raping her. "Israel" and all those who support the project in any way will suffer the consequences of their powerful racism. And crying about it won't win you many supporters.

No justice. No peace.

We're sticking to it.

Thanks for the effort and all but you'll have to do better with the point of your argument - whatever that is.

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.