Adbusters

#OCCUPYWALLSTREET

A shift in revolutionary tactics.
#OCCUPYWALLSTREET

#OCCUPYWALLSTREET

Alright you 90,000 redeemers, rebels and radicals out there,

A worldwide shift in revolutionary tactics is underway right now that bodes well for the future. The spirit of this fresh tactic, a fusion of Tahrir with the acampadas of Spain, is captured in this quote:

"The antiglobalization movement was the first step on the road. Back then our model was to attack the system like a pack of wolves. There was an alpha male, a wolf who led the pack, and those who followed behind. Now the model has evolved. Today we are one big swarm of people."

— Raimundo Viejo, Pompeu Fabra University
Barcelona, Spain

The beauty of this new formula, and what makes this novel tactic exciting, is its pragmatic simplicity: we talk to each other in various physical gatherings and virtual people's assemblies … we zero in on what our one demand will be, a demand that awakens the imagination and, if achieved, would propel us toward the radical democracy of the future … and then we go out and seize a square of singular symbolic significance and put our asses on the line to make it happen.

The time has come to deploy this emerging stratagem against the greatest corrupter of our democracy: Wall Street, the financial Gomorrah of America.

On September 17, we want to see 20,000 people flood into lower Manhattan, set up tents, kitchens, peaceful barricades and occupy Wall Street for a few months. Once there, we shall incessantly repeat one simple demand in a plurality of voices.

Tahrir succeeded in large part because the people of Egypt made a straightforward ultimatum – that Mubarak must go – over and over again until they won. Following this model, what is our equally uncomplicated demand?

The most exciting candidate that we've heard so far is one that gets at the core of why the American political establishment is currently unworthy of being called a democracy: we demand that Barack Obama ordain a Presidential Commission tasked with ending the influence money has over our representatives in Washington. It's time for DEMOCRACY NOT CORPORATOCRACY, we're doomed without it.

This demand seems to capture the current national mood because cleaning up corruption in Washington is something all Americans, right and left, yearn for and can stand behind. If we hang in there, 20,000-strong, week after week against every police and National Guard effort to expel us from Wall Street, it would be impossible for Obama to ignore us. Our government would be forced to choose publicly between the will of the people and the lucre of the corporations.

This could be the beginning of a whole new social dynamic in America, a step beyond the Tea Party movement, where, instead of being caught helpless by the current power structure, we the people start getting what we want whether it be the dismantling of half the 1,000 military bases America has around the world to the reinstatement of the Glass-Steagall Act or a three strikes and you're out law for corporate criminals. Beginning from one simple demand – a presidential commission to separate money from politics – we start setting the agenda for a new America.

Post a comment and help each other zero in on what our one demand will be. And then let's screw up our courage, pack our tents and head to Wall Street with a vengeance September 17.

for the wild,
Culture Jammers HQ


Adbusters #97: Post Anarchism – How To Live Without Dead Time (with #OCCUPYWALLSTREET campaign materials inside), hits newsstands on August 2. Go to adbusters.org/subscribe and subscribe!


534 comments on the article “#OCCUPYWALLSTREET”

Displaying 151 - 160 of 534

Page 16 of 54

Barriodelcarmen.net

FROM SPAIN,
http://www.barriodelcarmen.net/buenaventura//index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3131&Itemid=100010

Barriodelcarmen.net

FROM SPAIN,
http://www.barriodelcarmen.net/buenaventura//index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=3131&Itemid=100010

Anonymous

Demand all new money be 'New Money'. This money loses value at a fixed rate, say 5% per year. The money must be used for goods and services (eg: to pay people) or it can be spent on projects for the long-term good of the people: hospitals, schools, old-growth forest protection, water purification systems...but it cannot be invested or saved, or it will lose value.

What did the big corporations do with the bailout money (they never should've gotten, if capitalism really is capitalism)? They kept it, and tried to earn interest, at the expense of real jobs for people. New Money would force the money to be used by corporations, to pay the people, who would use it to pay off loans, pay each other for goods amde or grown and services provided, or spend it on health enhancing services like massage or counselling, trade schools to learn the dying arts of shoemaking, masonry, ironwork...

New Money moves, and turns into real things faster, and cannot be used for long-term harm to the earth.

Demand New Money Now!

Anonymous

Demand all new money be 'New Money'. This money loses value at a fixed rate, say 5% per year. The money must be used for goods and services (eg: to pay people) or it can be spent on projects for the long-term good of the people: hospitals, schools, old-growth forest protection, water purification systems...but it cannot be invested or saved, or it will lose value.

What did the big corporations do with the bailout money (they never should've gotten, if capitalism really is capitalism)? They kept it, and tried to earn interest, at the expense of real jobs for people. New Money would force the money to be used by corporations, to pay the people, who would use it to pay off loans, pay each other for goods amde or grown and services provided, or spend it on health enhancing services like massage or counselling, trade schools to learn the dying arts of shoemaking, masonry, ironwork...

New Money moves, and turns into real things faster, and cannot be used for long-term harm to the earth.

Demand New Money Now!

Anonymous

The problem with this is it would prevent normal people from saving money for rainy days and banks could just adjust their interest rates so it wouldn't help.

Anonymous

The problem with this is it would prevent normal people from saving money for rainy days and banks could just adjust their interest rates so it wouldn't help.

Anonymous

Yes, great idea. This may not happen at the national level, but local currencies have tried this idea that money should reflect the goods that it stands for by also depreciating in value.

It was an immense success when tried. See https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/W%C3%B6rgl

Anonymous

Yes, great idea. This may not happen at the national level, but local currencies have tried this idea that money should reflect the goods that it stands for by also depreciating in value.

It was an immense success when tried. See https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/W%C3%B6rgl

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.