Occupy's Spiritual Quest
MARCUS DEMERY
Dear occupiers, jammers, dreamers,
Three years after the May 1968 uprising that swept the world, the great French philosopher Michel Foucault observed that a key strategy of power is to “appear inaccessible to events.” Power, Foucault argued with a nod towards 1968’s failed insurrection, acts to “dispel the shock of daily occurrences, to dissolve the event … to exclude the radical break introduced by events.”
Forty years later, in light of Occupy, Foucault’s observation still strikes home. Despite achieving the impossible at unprecedented speed – sparking a global awakening, triggering a thousand people’s assemblies worldwide, and giving birth to a visceral anti-corporate, pro-democracy spiritual insurrection – Occupy is now struggling through an existential moment. Our movement has been dealt a blow: our May 1 and follow-up events have been dissolved by power; the status quo has shown itself to be far more resilient than many of us expected.
Now a passionate debate is emerging within our movement. On one side are those who cheer the death of Occupy in the hopes that it will transform into something unexpected and new. And on the other are patient organizers who counsel that all great movements take years to unfold.

OCCUPY WALL STREET IS NOW DEAD
May 1 confirmed the end of the national Occupy Wall Street movement because it was the best opportunity the movement had to reestablish the occupations, and yet it couldn’t. Nowhere was this more clear than in Oakland as the sun set after a day of marches, pickets and clashes. Rumors had been circulating for weeks that tents would start going up and the camp would reemerge in the evening of that long day. The hundreds of riot police backed by armored personnel carriers and SWAT teams carrying assault rifles made no secret of their intention to sweep the plaza clear after all the “good protesters” scurried home, making any reoccupation physically impossible. It was the same on January 28 when plans for a large public building occupation were shattered in a shower of flash bang grenades and 400 arrests, just as it was on March 17 in Zuccotti Park when dreams of a new Wall Street camp were clubbed and pepper sprayed to death by the NYPD. Any hopes of a spring offensive leading to a new round of space reclamations and liberated zones has come and gone. And with that, Occupy Wall Street and Occupy Oakland are now dead.
The task ahead of us in Oakland and beyond is to search out and nurture new means of finding each other. We are quickly reaching the point where the dead weight of Occupy threatens to drag down the Commune into the dustbin of history. We need to breathe new life into our network of rebellious relationships that does not rely on the Occupy Oakland general assembly or the array of movement protagonists who have emerged to represent the struggle. This is by no means an argument against assemblies or for a retreat back into the small countercultural ghettos that keep us isolated and irrelevant. On the contrary, we need more public assemblies that take different forms and experiment with themes, styles of decision-making (or lack there of) and levels of affinity… Most of all, we need desperately to stay connected with comrades old and new and not let these relationships completely decompose.
— Read the rest of the this article, by anonymous West Coast anarchists, at Bay of Rage

THE OCCUPY MOVEMENT HAS BARELY BEGUN
O
ccupy Wall Street was at the pinnacle of its power in October 2011, when thousands of people converged at Zuccotti Park and successfully foiled the plans of billionaire Mayor Michael Bloomberg to sweep away the occupation on grounds of public health. From that vantage point, the Occupy movement appears to have tumbled off a cliff, having failed to organize anything like a general strike on May Day – despite months of rumblings of mass walkouts, blockades and shutdowns.The mainstream media are eager to administer last rites. CNN declared that “May Day fizzled,” the New York Post sneered “Goodbye, Occupy,” and The New York Times consigned the day’s events to fewer than 400 words, mainly dealing with arrests in New York City.
Historians and organizers counter that the Occupy movement needs to be seen in relative terms. Eminent sociologist Frances Fox Piven, co-author of Poor People’s Movements, says:
“I don’t know of a movement that unfolds in less than a decade. People are impatient, and some of them are too quick to pass judgment. But it’s the beginning, I think, of a great movement. One of a series of movement that has episodically changed history, which is not the way we tell the story of American history.”
— Read the rest of Arun Gupta’s What Happened to the Occupy movement?
The fire in the soul of Occupy burns from Oakland to Quebec, Barcelona to Chicago, Wall Street to Moscow and Frankfurt… the question now is which fork in the road will our movement take?
for the wild,
Culture Jammers HQ
197 comments on the article “Occupy's Spiritual Quest”
Displaying 21 - 30 of 197
Page 3 of 20
Anonymous
"Meaningless slogans are the weapons of the stupid."
Anonymous
"What happens to us while we are growing up? Why do adults stop saying 'Quit it' to the bullies? The grown-up bullies are more powerful, but then, so are we." - Martha Stout
Real Change, no...
"Who gives a rat's ass what Martha Stout once wrote about some irrelevant topic? " - me, and my shadow
Anonymous
I have one more thing to add:
Divisiveness should not be manufactured from allies of occupy like adbusters. By putting these divisions into text, you are reifying things that would be better resolved in GAs not on the internet. I love adbusters, but you need to stop producing discontent in this movement. If occupy needs to transform itself it will do so through an insurrection as thunderous as the depictions of peasant uprisings portrayed by colonialists. Spontaneity is what made this movement, articulating factionalisms as "forks in the road" is highly detrimental to the universalist objectives we are out here to achieve. Lets not get caught up in tactics! Keep the strategy in mind, the eyes on the prize, and the tactics will follow.
dravazed
You're right, I think, and there *is* no strategic discussion here. It's always framed in terms of "tactics," and that may be significant. How do we transform society? That isn't a tactical question.
Anonymous
Adbusters isn't creating differences of opinion. If you read the other posts here it will become quite apparent that differences of opinion exist. Period. Adbusters is just pointing them out.
ie. Do you want to get rid of this system? Electoral politics, capitalism, the security state and all? Or do you just want to change who runs it? These are real disagreements that determine how we go forward and what actions we take.
Anonymous
Its not the media, its not the the strength of the "status quo", its the fact that Occupy only talks to itself. It meets with itself and only deliberates with itself. Occupy has become a fish in a fish bowl thinking its a whale in the ocean.
Anonymous
Thats bs. Occupy is everyone and it always has been. Those people who joined us last fall were occupy and everyone is. If you feel like you are not part of the movement then come to a general assembly and make the movement your own.
Anonymous
I was part of the movement, that's why I can analyze it as I have. Why have those people who joined last fall fallen to the wayside, left or deserted the movement? Why? Why are those who were dedicated to what they thought the movement would be, could have been stepped aside? You should ask yourself that first before assuming that I I had no involvement with occupy or know others who also were dedicated and have since walked away from the movement. But in your assumption lies a question, why should those who were never a part of the movement, didn't understand what is was or what it is now join? Do you ever question why the masses are either indifferent, hostile or sympathize at a distance without wanting to take part? If you can answer that question then you will better understand my post. You sound like a fish in a fish bowl who thinks itself a wolf looking at the landscape from atop of a mountain when in reality your not.
Anonymous
It's hard to take seriously someone who doesn't know the difference between you're and your. But anyway, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you were part of Occupy and not just an infiltrator.
Why did individuals join Occupy and then leave? It's not the movement's fault, because the movement is only a reflection of the individuals involved. Most people left Occupy, not because of ideological differences, but because of the physical difficulty of Occupying, along with the fact that winter came, and camps were destroyed.
If you don't know why the masses won't join, then YOU don't understand the media's all encompassing hold over the population, coupled with the deep narcissism, selfishness and triviality of the American people. They've been trained to be subservient, unthinking and uncritical since birth. They think of themselves as consumers, not citizens, as they've been trained.
During the American Revolution only one third of the populace were patriots, the rest were loyalists, and the revolutionary soldiers joined for a wage, not because of deeply held beliefs. Many of them were never paid what they were promised. The war was won because of a miracle: The French Fleet showed up on the coast of Yorktown, and the British surrendered. It doesn't take 99% to change the world, just enough blocking existing power structures and the rest, willing to go along with a new, more democratic system to create and pass laws, and control the unmanageable legal structures of banks and corporations, into something more manageable and less potentially harmful. But we have to create new democratic power structures, to replace the ones that are already failing. If we have created them, and they are in place and working, then people outside the movement will see and believe that there is an alternative to the current system.
In America, the right believe in white supremacy and authoritarianism within social Darwinism, and the left (if you can call it that) believe that you can have social justice within capitalism. Both views are laughable and contradictory. The rest of America doesn't have a political view, just wants to go to the mall. Put that together with the fact that many are scared to protest, the removal of the physical encampments, the lack of positive media, and that's why people are hostile to Occupy and aren't joining.
Obviously, OCCUPYING as a strategy isn't going to go work long term, because those in power will always resort to laws to quash physical protests, so the movement needs to morph into something different and relate its messages without relying on the msm. But none of that means it's failed or it's over - Just that it's evolving.
What Americans need is a way to step out of their false beliefs, their brainwashing, their Stockholm Syndrome, and start understanding that capitalism and a corporate run and controlled world isn't going to work for them, in the way people believed it would during the 20th century. A corporate run and controlled world will not lead to their prosperity, or their children's prosperity. The way the world operates now, humans are on a fast track to self destruction, while messing up the environment and polluting the planet, perhaps permanently. That kind of collective realization doesn't start and end with a protest, it starts with enlightening people, giving them the tools to think critically, then challenging the propaganda that is foisted on everyone through the education system, the media and our consumerist and corporate culture.
The internet is the key to all of this. Occupy needs to morph into a network of multiple ways people can gain independence from being a corporate wage slave, and that includes a knowledge base and means to connect within their own community. That, along with harnessing social media and spreading various messages through film, art, writing, and culture, is the way to move Occupy forward.
Pages
Add a new comment