Adbusters

Occupy's Spiritual Quest

The fork in the road ahead.

MARCUS DEMERY

Dear occupiers, jammers, dreamers,

Three years after the May 1968 uprising that swept the world, the great French philosopher Michel Foucault observed that a key strategy of power is to “appear inaccessible to events.” Power, Foucault argued with a nod towards 1968’s failed insurrection, acts to “dispel the shock of daily occurrences, to dissolve the event … to exclude the radical break introduced by events.”

Forty years later, in light of Occupy, Foucault’s observation still strikes home. Despite achieving the impossible at unprecedented speed – sparking a global awakening, triggering a thousand people’s assemblies worldwide, and giving birth to a visceral anti-corporate, pro-democracy spiritual insurrection – Occupy is now struggling through an existential moment. Our movement has been dealt a blow: our May 1 and follow-up events have been dissolved by power; the status quo has shown itself to be far more resilient than many of us expected.

Now a passionate debate is emerging within our movement. On one side are those who cheer the death of Occupy in the hopes that it will transform into something unexpected and new. And on the other are patient organizers who counsel that all great movements take years to unfold.

OCCUPY WALL STREET IS NOW DEAD

May 1 confirmed the end of the national Occupy Wall Street movement because it was the best opportunity the movement had to reestablish the occupations, and yet it couldn’t. Nowhere was this more clear than in Oakland as the sun set after a day of marches, pickets and clashes. Rumors had been circulating for weeks that tents would start going up and the camp would reemerge in the evening of that long day. The hundreds of riot police backed by armored personnel carriers and SWAT teams carrying assault rifles made no secret of their intention to sweep the plaza clear after all the “good protesters” scurried home, making any reoccupation physically impossible. It was the same on January 28 when plans for a large public building occupation were shattered in a shower of flash bang grenades and 400 arrests, just as it was on March 17 in Zuccotti Park when dreams of a new Wall Street camp were clubbed and pepper sprayed to death by the NYPD. Any hopes of a spring offensive leading to a new round of space reclamations and liberated zones has come and gone. And with that, Occupy Wall Street and Occupy Oakland are now dead.

The task ahead of us in Oakland and beyond is to search out and nurture new means of finding each other. We are quickly reaching the point where the dead weight of Occupy threatens to drag down the Commune into the dustbin of history. We need to breathe new life into our network of rebellious relationships that does not rely on the Occupy Oakland general assembly or the array of movement protagonists who have emerged to represent the struggle. This is by no means an argument against assemblies or for a retreat back into the small countercultural ghettos that keep us isolated and irrelevant. On the contrary, we need more public assemblies that take different forms and experiment with themes, styles of decision-making (or lack there of) and levels of affinity… Most of all, we need desperately to stay connected with comrades old and new and not let these relationships completely decompose.

— Read the rest of the this article, by anonymous West Coast anarchists, at Bay of Rage

THE OCCUPY MOVEMENT HAS BARELY BEGUN

O

ccupy Wall Street was at the pinnacle of its power in October 2011, when thousands of people converged at Zuccotti Park and successfully foiled the plans of billionaire Mayor Michael Bloomberg to sweep away the occupation on grounds of public health. From that vantage point, the Occupy movement appears to have tumbled off a cliff, having failed to organize anything like a general strike on May Day – despite months of rumblings of mass walkouts, blockades and shutdowns.

The mainstream media are eager to administer last rites. CNN declared that “May Day fizzled,” the New York Post sneered “Goodbye, Occupy,” and The New York Times consigned the day’s events to fewer than 400 words, mainly dealing with arrests in New York City.

Historians and organizers counter that the Occupy movement needs to be seen in relative terms. Eminent sociologist Frances Fox Piven, co-author of Poor People’s Movements, says:

“I don’t know of a movement that unfolds in less than a decade. People are impatient, and some of them are too quick to pass judgment. But it’s the beginning, I think, of a great movement. One of a series of movement that has episodically changed history, which is not the way we tell the story of American history.”

— Read the rest of Arun Gupta’s What Happened to the Occupy movement?

The fire in the soul of Occupy burns from Oakland to Quebec, Barcelona to Chicago, Wall Street to Moscow and Frankfurt… the question now is which fork in the road will our movement take?

for the wild,
Culture Jammers HQ

OccupyWallStreet.org

197 comments on the article “Occupy's Spiritual Quest”

Displaying 1 - 10 of 197

Page 1 of 20

Anonymous

almost all societies are fundamentally authoritarian. social movements have some temporary effect but even if the society goes into crisis and falls it will eventually be replaced by something similar if not worse

Tony Johnson

That's not true. The problem is how they are going about change. I've told these guys time and time again that what they are doing will not work. Occupy isn't dead , it just needs to change strategies. There's simply too many people being paid (salary , benefits , pension) by taxpayer dollars for protests to have any effect on the status quo. People in many gov't positions have been entrenched for 20-30 years and aren't going to be effected by protests. You have to hit them where it hurts.

Start working with elected officials
1. Start by supporting officials who want pension reform. Support candidates who want 401k instead of 100% or 50% salary. This alone will probably make some police move to the private sector. There they'd have to really work to secure a job. Support candidates who want to clean up this double dipping of salary and pension of the backs of taxpayers. This is totally unacceptable in California with the budget is the crisis state that it is.
2. Support candidates who want police accountability. This will causes the tactics to change
3. Police chiefs are their own worse enemy. There will be one shooting too many of an unarmed civilian. They always justify these things because they can lie and plant evidence as seen with these so called "terrorist" charges in Chicago. This can cost a police chief their job if not lost career due to bad PR
4. Support candidates who want budget cuts to clean up city / state / Federal budgets. This will make gov't employees do more with less. This is needed. After personally working at several federal government offices here in DC, many of these employees cannot justify their salary vs workload being performed. make these folks run their government offices like a private business.
5. many salaries of government employees are very high in comparison to private sector positions. This needs cleanup as the taxpayer cannot afford to keep paying these 150,000+ salaries for people to sit in meetings all day and not performing job tasks.
6. Personally I think unions for gov't employees only make work cost more money. The taxpayers cannot afford many of these expensive employment contracts with government entities. In some of these cases, I support union busting. Support candidates who want to cut the purse strings of these private unions including police unions.

I can think of many other ways reform can be mandates , but these are political battles. What you want will not be won by protesting. Occupy needs to turn more into Acorn (minus the prostitution)

Anonymous

Incremental reform has ALWAYS worked in the past! Our elected officials will, of course, listen to the people!
That's why we have a democracy, that's why we are free.....because we can vote! The voice of the people will always be heard by the millionaires in power!

But then I remember history, only by confronting the state head on, and by seizing power in the streets has change ever come for the masses.

Labor rights
Civil Rights
womyn's rights

Anonymous

Labor rights, civil rights, womyn's rights ... meaningless rights are now more evenly distributed in society, is that really progress or is it simply co-option

smash the state, true freedom through anarchy, true leadership through leaderlessness

Anonymous

Attacking public services/workers and union-busting - Tony Johnson sounds like a fully paid up member of the Tea Party. Occupy does not support such right-wing nonsense?

Anonymous

Try again. Right-wing attacks on public services/workers and support for union-busting - Occupy cannot support this Tea Party nonsense?

Anonymous

The human spirit is most alive in those who actually fight so that good may prevail. Anybody notice that?
It isn't an even-or debate and I wonder why Ab is framing it that way. One could cite the Sinn Fein/IRA model, or any successful struggle that combined both the weight of moral authority and a pretty good peoples' defense force. I'd like to see Occupy continue as always with emphasis on peaceful and democratic confrontations, and another force - independent of Occupy, yet with democratically derived principles - go against our most common enemy in the streets and byways of our communities.

sociopoliticonu...

we know that we need to revitalize the movement, but history shows, from Martin Luther nailing the 99 theses to the church, to the men who sat at that lunch counter and demanded they be served, to the guy that set himself on fire in Tunisia, historical context and big controversial symbolic moments spark social movements. If we want to revitalize the movement, my bet is that we're going to have to do something edgy as fuck that is significant to our current social reality in order to get this moribund creature back to life.

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.