Hey President Obama ...
Dear patriots, rabble-rousers, revolutionaries,
On Saturday thousands of us will occupy Wall Street. We will wave our signs, unfurl our banners, beat our drums, chant our slogans … and then we'll get down to business and hold several people's assemblies to decide what our "one demand" will be.
Shall we demand that President Obama reinstate the Glass-Steagall Act; outlaw flash trading; impose a 1% tax on all financial transactions?
These are good ideas but not very energizing.
How about we demand the revocation of corporate personhood?
Feels a bit too abstract. Many Americans don't fully grasp what's at stake with this one. And besides, even if he wants to, President Obama cannot deliver this immediately. In the wake of the recent Supreme Court ruling, a reform project like this requires a constitutional amendment that would take a few years and a whole movement to achieve.
We could demand Obama set up an American Democracy Reform Commission tasked with ending the monied corruption in Washington? Or perhaps a Presidential Commission to rethink the American banking system?
Most Americans know that Washington is awash with corporate money and undue influence and would like to see democracy vibrant again. And most would also love to see the "too big to fail" banks broken up, downsized and made to serve the people, the economy and society again. A demand along those lines just might capture the public's imagination.
What if, try as we might, we just can't come up with only one demand? Well, then maybe we can decide together on an END THE MONIED CORRUPTION OF AMERICA MANIFESTO – a rousing compendium of our most urgent demands. And on the seventh day of our occupation we publicly deliver our manifesto to the White House and to the American media, letting Obama know that we won't leave Wall Street until he responds.
If thousands of us hang in there day after day, week after week, we may be able to create a spectacular revolutionary experience that fires up the public imagination and eventually maneuvers Obama into doing something that he has so far not had the guts to do: agree to a bold, decisive stroke against the financial corruption of America. Now that would get the American people behind us and cheering us on from coast to coast.
If we can achieve that, the sky will be the limit … further demands will follow and a new America will be born.
On Saturday, our Tahrir moment begins … strength, courage, nonviolence!
for the wild,
Culture Jammers HQ
PS.
This Saturday at Noon, meet in Bowling Green Park at the Charging Bull statue in Lower Manhattan. Then at 3pm, join your fellow compatriots at One Chase Manhattan Plaza for the first of many people's assemblies. Check out occupywallst.org/article/lead-up-to-occupation for additional information that you should know before the occupation begins.
For those who cannot attend one of the global solidarity occupations happening in Milan, Madrid, Valencia, London, Lisbon, Athens, San Francisco, Santander, Madison, Amsterdam, Los Angeles and now Algeria and Israel, there will also be a live stream of #OCCUPYWALLSTREET at: livestream.com/globalrevolution
occupywallstreet.org / occupywallst.org
Reddit / Facebook / Twitter
322 comments on the article “Hey President Obama ...”
Displaying 271 - 280 of 322
Page 28 of 33
Anonymous
I wish people used these boards to talk about the changes we want to see in our country and our society. Stop attacking each other. For this movement to be successful we need to have constructive ideas on reforming our government in ways that the rational majority of Americans would want to see.
Anonymous
I wish people used these boards to talk about the changes we want to see in our country and our society. Stop attacking each other. For this movement to be successful we need to have constructive ideas on reforming our government in ways that the rational majority of Americans would want to see.
Anonymous
In a monetary system, democracy is an illusion perpetuated to give the populace a feeling of participation in a so-called democratic process.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Z9WVZddH9w
Anonymous
In a monetary system, democracy is an illusion perpetuated to give the populace a feeling of participation in a so-called democratic process.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Z9WVZddH9w
Anonymous
I'm sorry but this seems a little backasswards... holding a protest and deciding only AFTER its begun what its primary purpose is? Mr. Obama get ready for our pressing demands (when we finally figure out what our demands are and why they are so pressing)?
Seems a little silly. Not trying to be negative, just makes the whole thing seem not very serious if you gotta' think up reasons to be there... once you get there.
Anonymous
I'm sorry but this seems a little backasswards... holding a protest and deciding only AFTER its begun what its primary purpose is? Mr. Obama get ready for our pressing demands (when we finally figure out what our demands are and why they are so pressing)?
Seems a little silly. Not trying to be negative, just makes the whole thing seem not very serious if you gotta' think up reasons to be there... once you get there.
Anonymous
You are not using your head. Everyone has a different complaint, if you don't gather a consensus, some people will use that as a excuse to leave. Understand now?
Anonymous
You are not using your head. Everyone has a different complaint, if you don't gather a consensus, some people will use that as a excuse to leave. Understand now?
Anonymous
Once a consensus has been made, though, portions of those present will inevitably feel like their purposes for showing up are not being met, and support will therefore flag nonetheless. In my opinion it makes more sense to go into a protest with a specific cause, say ending corporate welfare. Then those who are passionate about it will come, and due to a unified concern for the same cause, be able to effectively organize and bring others to the cause.
Now do you understand my qualm with this current method? If I were to try and rally support from my friends and colleagues for a protest, it would be far more effective to be able to tell them the exact WHY and WHAT of the issue, one that I am already in unification with many others on as well as knowledgeable and passionate about, as opposed to the current situation where, in spreading the word about the protest, the most tangible details I am able to offer are "i dunno, we're gonna' try and figure somethin' out once we're there - NOW WHO'S WITH ME!?"
Again, not trying to be a hater, I just disagree with the way this is being organized.
Anonymous
Once a consensus has been made, though, portions of those present will inevitably feel like their purposes for showing up are not being met, and support will therefore flag nonetheless. In my opinion it makes more sense to go into a protest with a specific cause, say ending corporate welfare. Then those who are passionate about it will come, and due to a unified concern for the same cause, be able to effectively organize and bring others to the cause.
Now do you understand my qualm with this current method? If I were to try and rally support from my friends and colleagues for a protest, it would be far more effective to be able to tell them the exact WHY and WHAT of the issue, one that I am already in unification with many others on as well as knowledgeable and passionate about, as opposed to the current situation where, in spreading the word about the protest, the most tangible details I am able to offer are "i dunno, we're gonna' try and figure somethin' out once we're there - NOW WHO'S WITH ME!?"
Again, not trying to be a hater, I just disagree with the way this is being organized.
Pages
Add a new comment