Adbusters

OWS GUT CHECK

Three challenges Occupy must overcome.

LUCY NICHOLSON/REUTERS

Hey you nimble dreamers, believers and jammer tacticians out there,

Our movement has reemerged from winter hibernation to find that this spring we are different but so too is the political and tactical situation. Occupy now faces a series of existential challenges that will define the month of May and set the tone for our long-term future.

#1 challenge: Jump over the corporate media

It took the New York Times two weeks last year to wake up to the insurrection percolating in their own backyard. This May Day, we saw an insidious attempt to ignore and discredit us right across the mainstream media. Time to jam the corpo-commercial lie machine and shift the way information flows and meaning is produced. Here is occupier Charles Young’s take on the blackout:

“I know. It’s just a coincidence. Or conspiracy theory. The .01% who rule the United States would never stoop to such stunts to knock Occupy Wall Street off the front page and surround it with mentions of terrorism… But Occupy wasn’t on the Times’ front page, online or in print, either.”

Read more at Counterpunch.

#2 challenge: Block the co-optation of our movement

Last September, the old left didn’t want to touch us. Then Occupy captured the world’s imagination and now they are jumping in to channel our energy into electoral politics and symbolic actions. Founding Zuccotti Marisa Holmes warns that the co-opters are a deep threat to our movement:

“This is an election year. Everything is at stake. There will be many more attempts like The 99% Spring to come. The 1% have no intention of funding a movement that actually poses a threat to their power. They seek to manage social movements via foundations thru resource allocation, top-down structures, and co-opting language. In the past this strategy has proven effective at dividing, conquering, and integrating movements into respectable forms of activism, and it’s starting to take hold… We have realized our collective power, and we must not be pacified!”

Read more in the Occupy! Gazette #4.

#3 challenge: Occupy the future

Our most difficult task of all is to describe, build and sustain the post-capitalist future we want to live in. Here is Slavoj Žižek’s stab to get your juices flowing:

“It is not enough to reject the depoliticized expert rule as the most ruthless form of ideology; one should also begin to think seriously about what to propose instead of the predominant economic organization, to imagine and experiment with alternate forms of organization, to search for the germs of the New. Communism is not just or predominantly the carnival of the mass protest when the system is brought to a halt; Communism is also, above all, a new form of organization, discipline, hard work.”

Read more at the Guardian.

Hey occupiers: the old world has no future; their leaders have no solutions. Now everything from how we live to how we love and how the world is governed is up for grabs. Can we rise to the challenge? Let the tactical brainstorm begin.

for the wild,
Culture Jammers HQ

OccupyWallStreet.org / Tactical Briefing #29 and #30 / On May 12, retake the squares and on May 18, spark the #LAUGHRIOT then join the movement in Chicago

217 comments on the article “OWS GUT CHECK”

Displaying 91 - 100 of 217

Page 10 of 22

Anonymous

Absolutely Lunzie,

If we want to change the way things are then we need BUILD THE WORLD the way we know it should and that means living that life now and being that person we are asking others to be.
It is not actually about us and them, there is no 'us and them'. Take a look around, there is one world and one people.
We humans are prone to feel empowered we we join together against 'the enemy' whomever that may be at the time.
We easily fall into the trap of enjoying feeling indignant and exploited and blaming others for the way things are. I am not saying that the injustices Ocuppy exposes do not exist, they exist. They are cleary obvious to anyone who takes time to step off the consumer merry-go-round and think for themselves.
Keep exposing the truth and building a better world, lets not become so distracted by our 'enemy' that we forget to nuture our earth and each other.

Thanks good people

Anonymous

The use of black blocs it is exactly what the State, the system wants us to do

The State is thirsty of your violence.

The system is driving you desperate so you can succumb to violent action

The use of "targeted property destruction" it is not only not a revolutionary form of activism, but rather the fastest way to kill the movement

Why?

Because that allows the system to bring attention away from its own injustice, repression and violence to the very marginal violent actions, so they can criminalize, marginalize and disconnect from the 99% any form of political resistance

Also the argument of the "diversity of tactics" is not valid here, Adbusters, for when someone throws a stone against the cops, breaks a window and/or leads a container on fire, is provoking the inmediate indiscriminated counter-attack on all the protesters, and intensifying the criminalization of OWS/Indignados throughout the country.

If the media were owned by the people, maybe the "diversity of tactics" argument could be more palatable. But in the real world, in corporate capitalism, in a concrete, contextualized debate, we see the use of black blocs and engament of violent action means no more, no less than to let ourselves be trapped on the very trap the system wants to see us in.

If you take a look at the experience so far of the Indignados movement here in Spain, you'll see that while corporate media tends to minimize, silence or directly ignore pacific protests until they can no longer deny reality, they give massive attention to any black bloc, burning container, smashed starbucks and it is used as the perfect opportunity to characterize the movement as the "inner enemy"

On the general strike on March 29th there were some violent incidents in Barcelona. They were inmensely magnified by the media, corporations and politians and this is serving right now as an excuse to make a law that equirates legally sitting down to resist an eviction to throw molotov cocktails. Engaging in property destruction will be considered now a form of terrorism. Or resisting police authority in any kind, too. Please do not forget Spain is - used to be - a democratic regime just like France and probably more democratic than the US itself just some years ago. This isn't Syria - yet

The Spanish Indignados movement has organized then a national "Non Violence and Pacification Methodology" transversal working group. Iniciatives of the kind of WHITE BLOCKS (which block violent actions), mediation for conflict resolution in demonstrations, people witness (camera, livestream everywhere as a way to protect protesters), together with legal assitance, the use of panflets inviting to non-violent action in demonstrations, the organization of livestremmed non-violent workshops etc, etc, etc

For god shake I hope OWS won't step down into violence, because it will threaten the whole movement. Also jumping over corporate media as Adbusters claims. And going into universities and faculties to empower OWS, as we're doing, as a perfect complement to empower general assemblies and open spaces in parks and squares. Nothing will stop OWS once it gets strong in universities, boikot neoliberal economics deparments and opens up actively, persistently, in order to create bonds with the global revolution movement going on

Anonymous

Why don't you make a poll to see what is it the public support for black bloc tactis and violent forms of action?

We did it in Spain. Stron rejection of violent tactis within the movement scored 83%
For the larger society, it scores over 97%

Even the use of a simple virtual poll can give you a hint of what is public support for violent tactis at OWS

Anonymous

Thank you for your scripted concern.

Oh and it's YOU pushing black bloc as the only option under consideration.

Eh ma i

dravazed

Truth. To take on the mantle of violence is to take on the status quo at is strongest point. The established order is based upon violence, as it continually demonstrates both here and abroad. Does anyone not realize this?

So, if you're serious about pursuing violence, you are committed to guerrilla warfare, armies, etc. Short of that, it is just the tantrums of kiddies who break things--gestures that invite the violence of the State, with exactly zero accomplished by way of actually limiting their power to injure and eliminate us.

I think anyone who believes this is the way to go--and is not an outright agent of the government--has such flawed judgement that it borders on psychosis. The question here is not "are you rising up angry?" but "are you mad"?

Nonviolence is not only the perfume of the future we yearn for, it is also very wise. There is no avoiding suffering, but our best chance for victory lies this way.

Anonymous

Why does anyone who "takes on the mantle of violence" have to attack the status quo at its strongest
point? That's as stupid as saying we're water.

Anonymous

Who is calling for violence, black bloc or targeted property destruction?

You start off with a false premise, a straw man, therefore the entirety of your comment is irrelevant.

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.