Flash Encampments
PETER LEEMAN
Hey all you wild cats, do-gooders and steadfast rebels out there,
Our movement is living through a painful rebirth… “There has been a unfortunate consolidation of power in #OWS,” writes one founding Zuccotti. “This translates into ideological dominance and recurring lines of thought. We are facing a nauseating poverty of ideas.” Burned out, out of money, out of ideas… seduced by salaries, comfy offices, book deals, old lefty cash and minor celebrity status, some of the most prominent early heroes of our leaderless uprising are losing the edge that catalyzed last year’s one thousand encampments. Bit by bit, Occupy’s first generation is succumbing to an insidious institutionalization and ossification that could be fatal to our young spiritual insurrection unless we leap over it right now. Putting our movement back on track will take nothing short of a revolution within Occupy.
The new tone was set on Earth Day, April 22, in a suburb bordering Berkeley, California when a dozen occupiers quietly marched a small crowd to a tract of endangered urban agricultural land, cut through the locked fence and set up tents, kitchens and a people’s assembly. Acting autonomously under the banner of Occupy, without waiting for approval from any preexisting General Assembly, Occupy The Farm was notable for its sophisticated preplanning and careful execution — they even brought chickens — that offered a positive vision for the future and engendered broad community support. While encampments across the world were unable to re-establish themselves on May Day, this small cadre of farm occupiers boldly maintained their inspiring occupation for nearly four weeks.
In Minneapolis, a core of occupiers have launched an Occupy Homes campaign that is unique for its edgy tenacity. “What is unusual, in fact utterly unprecedented, is the level of aggression and defiance of the law by these activists,” a spokesperson for Freddie Mac, a U.S. corporation that trades in mortgages, told a local paper. “Over the past week … the city has tossed out protesters and boarded up the house, only to see the demonstrators peel back the boards and use chains, concrete-filled barrels and other obstacles to make it more difficult to carry them away,” the article reports. Last Friday, police were so desperate to prevent a re-occupation of the foreclosed home that they surrounded the house with “30 Minneapolis police officers with batons” and “over two dozen marked and undercover squad cars and a paddy wagon.” Occupiers responded by laughing and signing songs… joyous in their struggle to elevate the home into an symbol of democratic resistance to the banks.
In its own sweet way, our movement is now moving beyond the Zuccotti model and developing a tactical imperative of its own: Small groups of fired up second generation occupiers acting independently, swiftly and tenaciously pulling off myriad visceral local actions, disrupting capitalist business-as-usual across the globe.
The next big bang to capture the world’s imagination could come not from a thousand encampments but from a hundred thousand ephemeral jams… a global cascade of flash encampments may well be what this hot Summer will look like.
Meanwhile, tents are up once again in Tahrir Square and youth from Quebec to Auckland to Moscow to Oakland are rising up against a future that does not compute.
Stay loose, play jazz, keep the faith … Capitalism is crashing and our movement has just begun.
for the wild,
Culture Jammers HQ
126 comments on the article “Flash Encampments”
Displaying 61 - 70 of 126
Page 7 of 13
Anonymous
CCCP, exactly... So, you know the most genocide regime in history.
Anonymous
Without any reasoning or evidence, people get away saying, "the most genocide regime in history". Where is the hard evidence?
Anonymous
What's your point? Are you upset that somebody said the Soviets committed genocide? Or, as you upset that someone (incorrectly) stated that the Soviets were the number one genocidal regime, when in fact that title belongs to the Chinese?
So, which is it? Are you supporting the Russian or the Chinese claim to "most genocidal regime ever"?
Either way, the 120 million figure is an overall total of all regimes everywhere. It is correct to say that Communist regimes committed genocide to the tune of 120 million; it is not correct to say that any one regime did it on its own.
Anonymous
HARD EVIDENCE - PLEASE!
Anonymous
"Communist regimes committed genocide to the tune of 120 million", well they are Reds - self-evident really.
Anonymous
hahaha silly answer to a silly question. hard evidence about communism genocides? at this point, even a generic search engine like google has tons of material to show the blood you pretend don't see. Maybe you want to see the ghosts, and that is not in the internet. the point here is that those communist revolutions lead to bloodshed and dictatorship. and nobody even spoke about cuba and north korea. oops. anyway, this is 2012 then please lets talk about something constructive.
Anonymous
Not questioning the bloodshed, it is just that the numbers said to be murdered seem very, very high. Are you saying that any form of people control will always lead to bloodshed and dictatorship. For, in relation to civil revolts around the would, is not the roots of self-government a constructive issue?
Anonymous
We need we need Direct Democracy. If OWS get rid of communist ideology and open space to a new movement focused on Direct Democracy (DD Movement) it will be just making what it should do since its very beggining: trust in we the people to a self-government (never tried before) instead of get a handfull of people to keep bitching at baksters as if they would be a big deal - that's give your energy away exactly for those who don't deserve.
And an alert: elections must never be through electronic ballots; paper ballots placed into transparent ballot boxes monitored by public webcams is teh only way to make sure we'll always know people's will.
That is constructive.
Anonymous
http://samuel-warde.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/CLGF-msnbc.pdf
Here is what people are dealing with. I suggest anybody who is serious about making change reads this. It outlines how OWS is dealt with in some circles.
If you don't read it I have a suggestion. When you use social media remember that people can read your posts that are not private. They have access to your tweets on twitter and all that. THEY USE THEM.
Code words and secret languages may seem silly. They seem that way because the establishment knows that to control to population part of it requires control over that language.
swamiwilly
Wow! I read what's on their site. Scarry! Even though I don't believe in most conspiracy theories, I do believe in a "confluence of interest" where people with the same interests act in ways that add up to a powerful force, in this case, in favor of the 1%. This reminds me of the CitiBank memo about "Plutocracy" that is exposed in "Capitalism; A Love Story."
Pages
Add a new comment