Adbusters

Flash Encampments

Occupy morphs into a new model!

PETER LEEMAN

Hey all you wild cats, do-gooders and steadfast rebels out there,

Our movement is living through a painful rebirth… “There has been a unfortunate consolidation of power in #OWS,” writes one founding Zuccotti. “This translates into ideological dominance and recurring lines of thought. We are facing a nauseating poverty of ideas.” Burned out, out of money, out of ideas… seduced by salaries, comfy offices, book deals, old lefty cash and minor celebrity status, some of the most prominent early heroes of our leaderless uprising are losing the edge that catalyzed last year’s one thousand encampments. Bit by bit, Occupy’s first generation is succumbing to an insidious institutionalization and ossification that could be fatal to our young spiritual insurrection unless we leap over it right now. Putting our movement back on track will take nothing short of a revolution within Occupy.

The new tone was set on Earth Day, April 22, in a suburb bordering Berkeley, California when a dozen occupiers quietly marched a small crowd to a tract of endangered urban agricultural land, cut through the locked fence and set up tents, kitchens and a people’s assembly. Acting autonomously under the banner of Occupy, without waiting for approval from any preexisting General Assembly, Occupy The Farm was notable for its sophisticated preplanning and careful execution — they even brought chickens — that offered a positive vision for the future and engendered broad community support. While encampments across the world were unable to re-establish themselves on May Day, this small cadre of farm occupiers boldly maintained their inspiring occupation for nearly four weeks.

In Minneapolis, a core of occupiers have launched an Occupy Homes campaign that is unique for its edgy tenacity. “What is unusual, in fact utterly unprecedented, is the level of aggression and defiance of the law by these activists,” a spokesperson for Freddie Mac, a U.S. corporation that trades in mortgages, told a local paper. “Over the past week … the city has tossed out protesters and boarded up the house, only to see the demonstrators peel back the boards and use chains, concrete-filled barrels and other obstacles to make it more difficult to carry them away,” the article reports. Last Friday, police were so desperate to prevent a re-occupation of the foreclosed home that they surrounded the house with “30 Minneapolis police officers with batons” and “over two dozen marked and undercover squad cars and a paddy wagon.” Occupiers responded by laughing and signing songs… joyous in their struggle to elevate the home into an symbol of democratic resistance to the banks.

In its own sweet way, our movement is now moving beyond the Zuccotti model and developing a tactical imperative of its own: Small groups of fired up second generation occupiers acting independently, swiftly and tenaciously pulling off myriad visceral local actions, disrupting capitalist business-as-usual across the globe.

The next big bang to capture the world’s imagination could come not from a thousand encampments but from a hundred thousand ephemeral jams… a global cascade of flash encampments may well be what this hot Summer will look like.

Meanwhile, tents are up once again in Tahrir Square and youth from Quebec to Auckland to Moscow to Oakland are rising up against a future that does not compute.

Stay loose, play jazz, keep the faith … Capitalism is crashing and our movement has just begun.

for the wild,
Culture Jammers HQ

OccupyWallStreet.org / Tactical Briefing #34

126 comments on the article “Flash Encampments”

Displaying 31 - 40 of 126

Page 4 of 13

Anonymous

ACCEPT THERE IS NO "CIVIL" REVOLT IN SYRIA

Look around you, what do you see? An Occupy-type grass-roots movement, or a western-backed, Libyan-type, Armed Revolt? You can fool some of the people, some of the time...

Anonymous

There's not going to be any revolt. The American people are cowed, oblivious and narcissistic. They don't care about anything unless it's personally happening to them. That's the cumulative effect of capitalism. It creates a populace that wallows in narcissism, selfishness and greed.

There are always exceptions that prove the rule, but the majority actions of the populace reflect the majority view. Americans would like to consume less oil, but they don't want to give up their SUV's, catch public transport, ride bikes or walk. They'd like to eat healthier and live longer lives, but they won't give up fast food, packaged food with unlisted additive chemicals or factory farming. They'd like more jobs, bargaining rights and equal pay but they won't strike or risk their job. They'd like the wars to end, but if they don't have to go to war, hear about the war, see the war, or understand what's really going on, that's the same thing, isn't it? And the 1% don't care. As long as there are enough Americans ready to carry on and continue the farce of capitalism, they will continue to reap the financial rewards of that exploitation.

When you condition a populace to put profit above all else, and teach people to distract themselves from their individual and collective problems, this is the society you reap.

Anonymous

There isn't going to be a revolt... soon. There isn't going to be a revolt... given the present circumstances. However, circumstances change. With the unemployment numbers last Friday; with other economic indicators foretelling doom; with China, Brazil, India slowing drastically; with the Eurozone potentially in free fall... circumstances may well change.

Also, I'm not so sure capitalism creates only soul rot. It also has created enough affluence-in-the-cracks for the weed of occupy to sprout. Seeds of it's own destruction?

Anonymous

The economic situation would need to deteriorate markedly before people rise up or take action. Assuming Americans actually got off their couches and swarmed the streets, how do you think federal and state governments would react? Would they concede, then resign en masse? Would they write new laws? Amend the Constitution? Abolish the Fed? They would simply crack down on dissenters, mass arrest and announce a curfew, then bring out the national guard. And the media would collude with a propaganda campaign culminating in stories about violent troublemakers.

The unemployment numbers are a lie anyway, since Clinton changed the way the labor department calculates unemployment in '94, excluding those who have given up looking for work, or who are underemployed. The real unemployment figure is far worse than the Labor Dept monthly household sample survey number released. What's the percentage of the work force that would want a job if they could actually do something they liked, and perhaps even share or have flexible hours? What's the percentage of workers forced to retire early, due to a weak job market? What's the percentage of retirees living on Social Security and their savings, that would like to be working, or doing something constructive, but have been told they aren't valuable or needed? What's the percentage of students who have continued their studies and gone further into debt, because the unemployment rate is so high? Less than half the country is actually employed if you look at Census figures compared to payroll numbers. That means that less than half the country is supporting the other half through revenue and the rest is borrowed, growing the national debt.

And I don't understand your reasoning... That capitalism and the inequity it creates led to OWS, so therefore capitalism is good? OWS wouldn't be needed if capitalism worked.

Capitalism is the rot in society. Capitalism is idolatry. I'm agnostic, but even I can see how the worship and pursuit of money exacerbates the worst character traits of human beings. Vastly different societal, political economic and legal structures are needed to create positive long term change, at least at the level that I'd like to envisage.

Anonymous

Most of the rest of us are intentionally being targeted for elimination by the 1%. We are engaging in conflict with them and need to do so in order to survive. They, on the other hand, know how to survive without us and are probably prepared--own food, own water, own transportation and communication facilities etc.--to do without us; their economics is not our economics, the market is camouflage and their relationships with each other are feudal.

The Walker win in Wisconsin is nothing to despair over: the Democrats serves the master--just a little less obsequiously. Either way, Occupy's work remains the same: to stop the 1% from wiping most of the rest of us out.

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.