Adbusters Blog

Does OWS Have a Future?

The question mark that hangs over our movement.
Does OWS Have a Future?

Stanley Rogouski

Mike Emery is a sociology student at the University of Maine. This article first appeared in The Maine Campus.

Tuesday marks the four-month anniversary of the Occupy movement. Perhaps it’s time to ask the question: Is it working? In four months, has progress been made toward realizing the movement’s goals?

As much as I would like to be able to answer with an emphatic “yes,” reality is much less encouraging for Occupiers, who haven’t been able to maintain a consistent focus.

On July 13, 2011, Adbusters bloggers proposed an occupation of America’s financial center, slated to begin on Sept. 17. “[W]e want to see 20,000 people flood into lower Manhattan, set up tents, kitchens, peaceful barricades and occupy Wall Street for a few months,” the post read.

So far, so good.

“Once there, we shall incessantly repeat one simple demand in a plurality of voices,” according to the post.

And that “one simple demand” is the problem.

That original proposal was based on the Egyptian uprising and the Arab Spring in general. The organization proposed that OWS should demand “a Presidential Commission tasked with ending the influence money has over our representatives in Washington.”

Such a commission could have had a great and immediate impact on American politics or made proposals to lay a foundation for future reforms, like the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform. Instead, the idea was abandoned.

On Sept. 29, the 13th day of the Occupation, the General Assembly at Zuccotti Park issued a declaration listing 23 grievances against major corporations. Nowhere did this declaration call for a Presidential Commission, or for any action, except to suggest direct democratic participation and an admonition to “[e]xercise your right to peaceably assemble.”

We have seen peaceable assembly in the months since; we haven’t seen political action.

Compare this to the Tahrir Square protests in Egypt. Protests began on Jan. 25 and on Feb. 11, President Hosni Mubarak resigned. The revolution continued, and democracy is still at risk. Nevertheless, in less than a month, the Tahrir protesters did something that the OWS protesters haven’t yet done: They gave their country an opportunity for real change. They achieved their first major goal and then moved on to continue fighting.

The Occupy movement has tried to keep organization loose – the various local Occupy protests are linked in name and in spirit but have no obligation to support a particular political agenda. This has led to political fragmentation, as each group of protesters agitates for their own particular reforms. Some of these reforms have stayed on the target of reducing corporate influence in American politics, while others branch out unnecessarily.

For example, among the 23 grievances listed by the General Assembly at Zuccotti Park, there were references to corporations blocking renewable energy, mistreating animals and perpetuating colonialism. A flyer for an Occupy UMaine rally in November stated, “The Greedy Government & Corporations should be feeding & clothing the hungry, homeless, & struggling hard working American families.”

While I applaud the various groups of Occupiers for trying to keep these issues in the spotlight as long as the Occupy movement has it, the lack of focus on one singular, powerful reform has allowed Occupy opponents to paint the movement as one of radicals and hippies, letting inattentive members of the public gloss over the fundamental idea of the protests: Corporate influence in government perpetuates unhealthy levels of inequality.

Every other complaint, every proposed reform, stems from this issue.

As we’ve seen in Egypt – where protests and grassroots political action continue almost a year after President Mubarak’s resignation – a political movement doesn’t have to stop when it achieves its first goal.

Social activism is a task that never ends. As it stands now, the Occupy movement is showing us that without focus, a social movement with its heart in the right place and international support can squander its political potential.

Mike Emery is a fourth year sociology student at the University of Maine. His political columns appear every Wednesday in The Maine Campus.

What do you think? Does our movement have a future? Can we brainstorm/network through winter and come out swinging in the Spring?

Support + Share

Help us spread the word. Share it online with your friends or subscribe to the print edition.

All Comments

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The business with the

by Anonymous on January 24 2012, @11:11 pm

The business with the desecrations in the churches is appalling. I've been a supporter, I have friends who are very involved, and when conservative family members started dismissing OWS as a bunch of bums over the holidays, I defended the movement. I pointed out that NYC churches were being supportive, offering housing the very evening of the day that Zucotti Park got shut down (I was there, I heard the first offers) as proof that this was a movement that many religious people were supporting.

I'm dreading the next time the family gathers and the subject comes up. They are going to laugh me out of the room.

I see where the stories are being spread - Fox News. The National Review. The Wall Street Journal. Conservatives delighting in smearing the movement. But even if it was one or two bad apples, their deeds were a terrible, terrible repayment of the kindness those churches showed.

If there's been any sort of formal public apology, or even acknowledgement of that, I haven't seen it. I'd love to.

The business with the

by Anonymous on January 24 2012, @11:11 pm

The business with the desecrations in the churches is appalling. I've been a supporter, I have friends who are very involved, and when conservative family members started dismissing OWS as a bunch of bums over the holidays, I defended the movement. I pointed out that NYC churches were being supportive, offering housing the very evening of the day that Zucotti Park got shut down (I was there, I heard the first offers) as proof that this was a movement that many religious people were supporting.

I'm dreading the next time the family gathers and the subject comes up. They are going to laugh me out of the room.

I see where the stories are being spread - Fox News. The National Review. The Wall Street Journal. Conservatives delighting in smearing the movement. But even if it was one or two bad apples, their deeds were a terrible, terrible repayment of the kindness those churches showed.

If there's been any sort of formal public apology, or even acknowledgement of that, I haven't seen it. I'd love to.

Occupy Wall Street: A Social

by Anonymous on January 24 2012, @09:45 am

Occupy Wall Street: A Social Barometer
Occupy Wall Street started in New York’s financial district and with startling swiftness spread across the entire country and then the world. The protesters involved in the event seemed to have a variety of causes and some referred to the movement as a giant soapbox for anybody to come out and voice their opinions. But one idea was unified among all of them. A sad piece of common knowledge that everyone seemed to know and accepted as permanent and unchangeable. This was the idea that the rich are getting richer and manipulating the masses and the government to do their bidding at the cost of the common good. You would be hard pressed to find someone that didn’t accept this reality whether it is in the heart of the Occupy movement or in some small diner in the Bible belt.
Many are surprised at how long it took for Americans to rise up against big business especially in the current global climate of change and advocacy. Protests are common in our European neighbors but somehow in America we have lacked in or organization. Perhaps it is our vast geographic distances from one another or the wide range of sub-cultures and communities that we were unable to find common ground. But alas we have come together, not to fight an enemy but to fight an attitude. This attitude we stand against is the belief that the super rich are infallible. The attitude that they have the right to influence our government that is suppose to serve us all. The attitude that money is a form of free speech and can be used to influence public institutions. The attitude that money is the ultimate form of power and should be pursued above all else.
The reason the Occupy members choose Wall Street as their base of operations is clear. It is the financial hub of America, capitalism and the world. It is ground zero for the greedy. It is where stockbrokers and bankers knowingly sold out their fellow Americans futures for their own monetary gain. This where fortunes were built on the backs of the weak. This is location where capitalism began to devour itself. So it only seemed only natural that they go directly into the belly of the beast, proclaiming openly, “We know what you did and we see through your guise. We won’t let you destroy the futures of many for the gluttony of a few”. And so began the American peoples revolution, as I’m sure it will come to be recognized in the coming years.
Is this was a war than the occupy movement would be but one battle. The enemy is not person or a group but a system. The system has been years in the making and declares itself supreme above all others. The system that accepts it’s faults and shrugs improvement. The system uses peoples optimism and patriotism against them telling people that if they follow the American dream, work hard and follow the rules they will be rewarded when their only reward is the bait and switch. The bait of the American Dream is switched for the reality that most people die in the same financial tier in which they were born. The bait of hard work is switched for the reality that most of the wealthy inherited their money. And the bait of following the rules is switched with the reality that many wealthy and successful people generated their money through unsavory, irresponsible, harmful if not downright unlawful means.
The occupy movement was not a solution nor did it claim to be. The Occupy movement was a call to arms. It was mirror held up to the wealthy in this country to show them what they’ve become. It was a snapshot of American people to other Americans to show them what we’ve become. It was the inquisition of ourselves to ask, “Is this the best we can do?” It was a challenge to all of the great and the good in this country and the world for the next grand idea. But most importantly, the Occupy Movement was the message to the public from ourselves- “Unity is more powerful than currency”.

thanks to adbusters chosen

by Anonymous on January 23 2012, @02:58 pm

thanks to adbusters chosen start date many Occupations have struggled to just survive the winter. We'll see shoots of growth in the spring

Not much time, we all need to

by Anonymous on January 23 2012, @09:12 pm

Not much time, we all need to prepare our hearts, me as well.

What can we learn from the

by Anonymous on January 23 2012, @08:47 pm

What can we learn from the 60's and the 70's protests,
Our Oppressors had so many years to develop their tactic on the populace,
We are fighting the same forces, we need a serious group in nga nyc that is willing to go all the way,

Yes very definitely. We have

by Anonymous on January 22 2012, @07:05 pm

Yes very definitely.
We have to educate common people about the harm done by our politico-economic system dominated by moneylenders.
They deprive us of most of our income and control all aspects of our lives.
This has to end at any cost.
Else civilization will come to an end.

I totally agree. Looking at

by Anonymous on January 20 2012, @11:16 pm

I totally agree. Looking at points of view flying around the last few weeks it would appear losing one's ability to pirate online or view any garbage spewed out on u-tube were paramount. Too much irony and hypocrasy worth contemplating. Exposing corruption and curtailing big money in government was(and still should be) our main objective. Focus, people.

Occupying is more useful than

by Anonymous on January 19 2012, @12:20 pm

Occupying is more useful than writing about it. :p

Yes, and to be honest I find it offensive how people on the same side of political activism are still debating it. All over the world are movements in protest to very concrete problems which are all interwoven, is your article on the legitimacy of such an action helping or hindering the cause?

This article looks like it was written by the same people paid off by corporations to question the reality of global warming. It's a bout time Americans took to the streets, so when they do, don't complain if its not as organized as you like, you can get up and organize something yourself within this movement and people will stand beside you.

One of the most disturbing aspects of American politics is how afraid even radical activists are not to have anyone giving them orders. It seems the biggest critique of this movement is the lack of authority presence. It may not look effective in its short lifetime, but it is the most important part in a wave of peaceful anarchy. If you're concerned about the direction Occupy is taking or not taking, no one will stop you from going your own way.

Occupy is more useful than nothing, so until there is a new revolution for followers to join stop questioning one of the only effective protests this country is seen in a decade of war.

What is the point of this article?

Writing and imagining and

by roadconnoisseur on January 23 2012, @09:51 am

Writing and imagining and picturing creates flows. It opens gates.
And creates the flows within life. :-)

Creating is resisting. Resisting is creating.

I agree fully with this point

by Along the Great Divide on January 22 2012, @05:49 am

I agree fully with this point of view of not changing the method of operation of Occupy. "If it ain't broken, don't fix it". Occupy support has swept around the world, and there has never been any movement in this country which has garnered the support which Occupy received at any time in our history in such a short window of time.

The best movement is one which responds to all people. And, Occupy has touched upon everyone, even those on the "other side". By allowing each grass roots organization to chose its own agenda, then this allows for flexibility which gives life to the movement. Centralizing leadership will stifle this movement and allow outside forces to attack the "head".

By allowing everyone to voice their own personal issue is one of the most important mechanism of this movement. Over time the issues will be whittled down through a process of evolution. And, at the same time the main issues have always been focused on the greed and corruption of the 1% along with the political collusion of the government which allows this to operate unimpeded.

Call out the Occupy forces for the Spring Rally, and you will see a Tsunami of humanity. After watching the primary elections unfolding, the way things are looking, we will be in for another four years worst than the last twelve.

So, if there is any real hope for the future, that hope lies in the success of Occupy in its evolutionary form. POPULUS VENIT! The people have arrived!

What's happened in Santa Fe

by Anonymous on January 19 2012, @04:28 am

What's happened in Santa Fe seems pretty straightforward.

The message is simple and can be addressed to any politicians--from city councils to the US Congress.
It would be great if this would go viral...

http://whowhatwhy.com/2012/01/13/occupy%e2%80%99s-99-pledge/

Yes. We are occupying

by middletonchaz on January 18 2012, @10:49 pm

Yes. We are occupying Adbusters March 14th. occupyadbusters(dot)com

What for? What are your

by Anonymous on January 19 2012, @08:26 pm

What for?
What are your demands?

That original proposal was

by Anonymous on January 18 2012, @05:38 pm

That original proposal was based on the Egyptian uprising and the Arab Spring in general. The organization proposed that OWS should demand “a Presidential Commission tasked with ending the influence money has over our representatives in Washington.”

The above, from the article, is an example of an actual, achievable goal. "End Capitalism" and the like are just so much childish rantings. If most of the so-called "Occupiers" would step back for a minute and think about the author is saying, they'd realize he's right: this movement will only succeed if it has real, achievable goals that can be concisely articulated to people that are unfamiliar with the group.

I do *not* support "Occupy." However, I think the Presidential Commission is a very, very good idea.

Starting to see how that works?

I support this, too. A

by Chris Honeycutt on January 18 2012, @07:39 pm

I support this, too.

A Presidential Commission tasked with ending the influence money has over our representatives in Washington might not fix it, but at least the information that's now hidden will be brought into the open.

Other "doables":

- End affinity agreements between banks and universities. Many Occupiers (and non-Occupiers) are pissed about student loan debt. Most people don't realize that it was a fraudulent relationship that caused the student loan fiasco, with banks giving kickbacks to schools.

- Force banks and investment firms to open up how their investment rates and derivative values are calculated. Li's Gaussian Copula and other investment math lies were major causes of the 2008-2009 catastrophes.

occupy# should not be taken

by Anonymous on January 18 2012, @02:17 pm

occupy# should not be taken as something with a beginning and an end, well, there is a beginning and an end of public manifestation of the movement, but the beliefs and values that people in the movement share have been around long before and will last on. it should be taken as a global "hello" to fellow beings who think that there is an alternative to how things have been done this far. how the movement evolves is different and depends on local environments (i mean social and physical) and to expect occupy# to grow into some super-organism-uniting-all-people with one clear focus, then how it will be different from the previous super-powers? if there is a need to measure the future of the movement then it could be done by calculating the individual responsibility we have in our lives or through the decisions we, and people in our neighborhoods make every day, whether to shop at super markets or look for local producers. calculate it through the creative ways we make things happen despite of the first though "but i don't have enough money". occupy# does not have a future, but i believe "occupiers" have a better future because of it, thanks to all who contribute in their own ways! cheers!

I agree completely. This

by Anonymous on January 18 2012, @02:22 pm

I agree completely. This piece in ROAR about the indignados talks about the movement as a new "social climate", which I think provides a nice framework for answering those famous questions about "the day after". It's written by the guy who was quoted in the original AdBusters ad for #OWS, Raimundo Viejo:

The day after: the movement beyond the protest
http://roarmag.org/2012/01/delclos-viejo-indignados-2012-15-m-spain/

The way I see it is peaceful

by sachmoe2 on January 18 2012, @01:54 pm

The way I see it is peaceful protest can only go so far. We need to take down major corporations as the 99%, starting with Walmart, and work our way down the list.

Don't take down Walmart,

by Anonymous on January 19 2012, @09:56 am

Don't take down Walmart, after all many people shop there, and they are a major discounter and thereby all you would do is "promote inflation"! THE BETTER WAY is to take down the "EVIL KINGS" who have absorbed most of the world's wealth in an effort to "enrich themselves" and do so "quite secretly and underhandedly" and only by "bringing out the secrets" can the "abuse of power" the evil rich people of this world engage in, be stopped permanently!

It is not a "crime to be rich" by the way, but the "honest rich person is rare" no doubt as RARE AS JOB, Abraham and Moses of old!

The question of the future of

by Recker for President on January 18 2012, @01:45 pm

The question of the future of Occupy Wall Street and the movement called the 99%; really is one that must not be debated but must keep moving. I’ve said this from the beginning, in order to make our voice heard we need someone who can speak collectively for the group. There are so many good people to choose from!!!

When the opposition has Corporate Money to make Congress quickly makes laws against protesting, against the ideal promoted by the 99%ers, or say that we are just have envy of the rich should be fuel enough to keep this going. When these people control both the Democrats and the Republicans in Congress, on the Bench, in the Whitehouse, at the Federal, State and Local level…the only way we can overcome this is through awareness and persistence…and the power of the Vote!

Yesterday we celebrated Martin Luther King and all he fought for…like he like the 99% didn’t/doesn’t have major corporations backing the movement, he only had local and limited pockets of support, and he was hated…but he and his group were fighters. America slowly began to hear his message and over time he gained support and changed the world. We may never have someone as great as MLK to lead a movement like ours which I argue is as equally as important…be must try, we must organize.

I for one hope the 99% movement will not become a footnote within a soon to be censored Wikipedia Page; I’d like the movement to become more, to become what is should be—reality. We are the 99%, we do matter, we have a voice, we have a point, we can’t make our own change.

Remember how important the power of the Vote really is!

KJAR
www.twitter.com/ReckerforPres

I’m a master student of

by paulavelezcastillo on January 18 2012, @01:01 pm

I’m a master student of digital media at the Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, in Medellin, Colombia. I’ve always been very passionate of cyberactivism, and I’m also an activist, so the subject of my thesis it’s the cyberactivism in social networks. I need your opinions about ciberactivism, if you want to help me with a few questions just click the link: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dHFnS3BiT2l6VHJEd2F... Beforehand thank you very much!

We are demanding to the wrong

by Anonymous on January 18 2012, @12:58 pm

We are demanding to the wrong people. It's gone past that stage. We have to do it ourselves.

A government of the people

by Anonymous on January 18 2012, @12:34 pm

A government of the people

Want a simple demand? How

by Anonymous on January 18 2012, @12:22 pm

Want a simple demand? How about looking to the name itself, "Occupy"? How about it be time to demand people rise up and occupy areas they are concerned about and affect change? And also look to what the word "occupy" means, and what it means to Occupy and also what is involved with an occupation? I am not sure what is needed is one uniformed message to be voted up or down, like it is a consumer product people buy, but a community people can see themselves in and join the occupation. Idea isn't to protest and whine for things to be different, but to be the change and make it happen. If Occupy reduces it to being a single interest group like PETA or even the Tea Party, will you get real change?

The question is not "does

by Anonymous on January 18 2012, @07:56 am

The question is not "does occupy have a future?" The question is, "Does our future have a future?"

one demand : end capital,

by Anonymous on January 18 2012, @06:23 am

one demand : end capital, commodities, wage slavery and the military (which is in of itself akin to slavery)

Well that is not really one

by Anonymous on January 18 2012, @06:52 am

Well that is not really one demand. Perhaps we should also work to an actual achievable one at that.

1. If you did your research,

by Anonymous on January 18 2012, @04:11 pm

1. If you did your research, you'd realize that Debt, Money and Capital are all the same carrot to be chased.

2. If you adopt the thinking that ending capitalism is an unreachable goal, then you will accomplish nothing.

Capital should not be allowed

by Anonymous on January 18 2012, @07:12 pm

Capital should not be allowed to make capital through usury or some other complicated scheme.
Goods are made by human effort. Whoever puts the effort in making them should own them not the moneylenders/capitalists.
We should be working to make this clear to the common people, and the Professors of economics, and the Church.