Battle for the Soul of Occupy
sinkers.org
As we prepare for the May uprising, two power centers of our movement have announced plans for a spectacular bi-coastal May 1st bridge blockade. On the West Coast, Occupy Oakland and Occupy San Francisco are planning rush hour disruptions on the Golden Gate Bridge while in New York City, occupiers say they will block one or more Manhattan-bound bridges. These acts of nonviolent direct action will set the tactical tone for the next phase of Occupy: they signal the turn towards Strike actions aimed at disrupting the flow of money. And, on a deeper level, these blockades come at a pivotal moment for Occupy as the movement grapples with a battle for its soul.
The question many occupiers are debating is whether the spirit and voice of Occupy will stay with the new left horizontals who launched the uprising or whether it will move towards MoveOn’s 99% Spring, and their old left buddies at The Nation magazine, Ben & Jerry’s, et al.
For the first most spectacular days of Occupy – such as on September 24 when eighty Zuccottis were arrested and shocking footage of women getting maced was replayed on national television – MoveOn ignored our movement. They decided to jump on board much later when 700 nonviolent occupiers were arrested on the Brooklyn Bridge. They saw this mass arrest as an opportunity to fold Occupy into their electoral Rebuild the Dream campaign to bolster Obama. At a time when Occupy was inspiring hundreds of thousands of people across the nation to take the squares, set up leaderless encampments and reinvent democracy in people’s assemblies, MoveOn held an October 5 online “Virtual March on Wall Street” with their friends at Rebuild the Dream.
At the peak of Occupy, when the people’s movement had catalyzed a global day of action on October 15 that saw millions of us in 82 countries rally in financial districts and capital cities for real democracy, MoveOn tried to cash in on Occupy’s momentum with a donation pitch. “We have to capitalize on this momentum now,” wrote MoveOn in an email to its members. “Can you chip in $5?”
And now, MoveOn wants to hijack our movement with their 99% Spring.
MoveOn is an existential threat to our movement because they don’t have a revolutionary bone in their body … if we give these clicktivists any more room then they will pull off a managed cooling of our revolutionary fervor … they will neuter the kind of bold, militant nonviolent direct actions that are the key to the next phase of our movement. Don’t let them do it!
Jump, jump, jump over the dead body of the old left!
159 comments on the article “Battle for the Soul of Occupy”
Displaying 31 - 40 of 159
Page 4 of 16
Anonymous
Good try but ...complete fail!
Anonymous
Good try but ...complete fail!
Anonymous
Well, from the reports I heard, they turned into more of a networking session than training.
The materials justify that view, as there was little actual "training." Just talk about how movements start, and general ideas about them. But that's not training.
As a contrast, I went to a direct action training session held by OccupyDC. There, they actually trained people on how to march, trained people what to do when the police flank you, and how to react to law enforcement when things get out of hand.
That's actual training, but there seemed to be little of that there; mainly because I don't think MoveOn knows how to do direct action. But again, that's part of MoveOn's problem.
Liberation Now!
Well, as an anarchist who's been doing community organizing for years and who led a 99% Spring training I can tell you that the training did three things a. it helped to build community and network activists from a whole range of backgrounds, b. it gave people a basic understanding of the history of non-violent direct action, from labor, to civil rights, to act-up, to earth first, and c. it discussed the basics of how to organized successful direct actions.
Maybe you should stop trusting everything you read and hear and check shit out for yourself before buying into the gossip.
And I'm not sure, you seem to be some kind of training expert, but march and dealing with police is one thing, actually having a larger strategy, goals and analysis is what Occupy has been lacking. And for that might friend it might be useful to look outside of Occupy to the people who have been doing grassroots organizing for years and not assume we have all the answers.
Anonymous
Well then I don't see the problem, if MoveOn isn't giving the training those who are there for that purpose will simply leave, just showing up and networking isn't going to turn someone into an Obama loving voter for christ's sake.
Anonymous
The Dems all work for the people that brought us to this day of poverty, outsourced jobs, threatened safety nets of which we wouldn't need if we had fair playing fields etc. The Dems are as right as the Repubs and we are sick of this BS game of saying something is left or liberal just because people say their group is left or liberal, when it is clearly just marginally left of uber ravenous far far far right wingers. We can't get caught in this same old garbage.
It is not being able to see this that has put the handful of elite in complete control of every aspect of our lives. This country was founded on "not being controlled by royalty" and we are right back to it. Wake up and realize it is a black or white issue that is being purposely clouded by the phony left right paradigm that is really nothing but elite control on both sides.
Liberation Now!
Your argument doesn't even speak to what I wrote so I'm not sure what to say except, keep on thinking in black and white terms and you'll end up being just like all the republicrats who fucked everything up.
Unless you think Occupy should become the new elite, then gimme some strategy for how we are going to push past our little camp ghettos and build coalitions with oppressed people who don't have the privilege to come out and camp.
Anonymous
I agree...the fact that Adbusters produced this article promoting division has me concerned...It is as though you are trying to create a Fear-Based movement laden with Ego-driven objectives...like that of a single mind...one person trying to take something from another person...or claim that it's their's in the first place so they can get it back. As a sometimes Activist sometimes Cliskster...as you also must be...I See this divisiveness as a waste of time and resources and wonder why you would be motivated to spend energy on this.
Did someone send you the graphic and you had to create an article to go with it? Is it an experiment? Are you really Adbusters??
Is this a trial piece, your first one?
Anonymous
I agree...the fact that Adbusters produced this article promoting division has me concerned...It is as though you are trying to create a Fear-Based movement laden with Ego-driven objectives...like that of a single mind...one person trying to take something from another person...or claim that it's their's in the first place so they can get it back. As a sometimes Activist sometimes Cliskster...as you also must be...I See this divisiveness as a waste of time and resources and wonder why you would be motivated to spend energy on this.
Did someone send you the graphic and you had to create an article to go with it? Is it an experiment? Are you really Adbusters??
Is this a trial piece, your first one?
Anonymous
"And by the way, it's a bit too convenient that Adbuster's offers no true transparency or accountability for it's "tactical briefings". The anonymous voice of Adbusters heralding it's calls for insurrections. Frankly it's a little creepy. Why should we trust you? Who that fuck are you? Why don't you show yourselves? Just saying, it's a little cowardly."
LOL! I love it!
Pages
Add a new comment