Adbusters

Battle for the Soul of Occupy

Round #5 - Will MoveOn knock us out?

sinkers.org

As we prepare for the May uprising, two power centers of our movement have announced plans for a spectacular bi-coastal May 1st bridge blockade. On the West Coast, Occupy Oakland and Occupy San Francisco are planning rush hour disruptions on the Golden Gate Bridge while in New York City, occupiers say they will block one or more Manhattan-bound bridges. These acts of nonviolent direct action will set the tactical tone for the next phase of Occupy: they signal the turn towards Strike actions aimed at disrupting the flow of money. And, on a deeper level, these blockades come at a pivotal moment for Occupy as the movement grapples with a battle for its soul.

The question many occupiers are debating is whether the spirit and voice of Occupy will stay with the new left horizontals who launched the uprising or whether it will move towards MoveOn’s 99% Spring, and their old left buddies at The Nation magazine, Ben & Jerry’s, et al.

For the first most spectacular days of Occupy – such as on September 24 when eighty Zuccottis were arrested and shocking footage of women getting maced was replayed on national television – MoveOn ignored our movement. They decided to jump on board much later when 700 nonviolent occupiers were arrested on the Brooklyn Bridge. They saw this mass arrest as an opportunity to fold Occupy into their electoral Rebuild the Dream campaign to bolster Obama. At a time when Occupy was inspiring hundreds of thousands of people across the nation to take the squares, set up leaderless encampments and reinvent democracy in people’s assemblies, MoveOn held an October 5 online “Virtual March on Wall Street” with their friends at Rebuild the Dream.

At the peak of Occupy, when the people’s movement had catalyzed a global day of action on October 15 that saw millions of us in 82 countries rally in financial districts and capital cities for real democracy, MoveOn tried to cash in on Occupy’s momentum with a donation pitch. “We have to capitalize on this momentum now,” wrote MoveOn in an email to its members. “Can you chip in $5?”

And now, MoveOn wants to hijack our movement with their 99% Spring.

MoveOn is an existential threat to our movement because they don’t have a revolutionary bone in their body … if we give these clicktivists any more room then they will pull off a managed cooling of our revolutionary fervor … they will neuter the kind of bold, militant nonviolent direct actions that are the key to the next phase of our movement. Don’t let them do it!

Jump, jump, jump over the dead body of the old left!

159 comments on the article “Battle for the Soul of Occupy”

Displaying 1 - 10 of 159

Page 1 of 16

Anonymous

I don't agree that MoveOn is an existential threat. Their draw is the mostly over 50 crowd who were all very interested in us Occupiers at the event I snooped on. The MoveOn speakers, while I guess well meaning, were largely bafoons and who could not lead an army of ants out of a wet paper bag. Certainly will be a problem if they start siphoning off funds that could go to support various Occupations, but otherwise, I didn't see MoveOn as being even close to being up for the tasks that need to be done to take the movement, the country, or the world to the next level.

Anonymous

It is like how sometimes corporate politicians will intentionally field a weak candidate in order to bump a stronger, but more radical candidate out of the race. They're willing to see the other side win in order to stop more radical voices from emerging. This example works for both Kucinich and Ron Paul. Both sides do it.

MoveOn doesn't care if 99% Spring succeeds. They just don't Occupy to succeed.

ArtX

For me, the radically horizontal, democratic nature of the Occupy Movement is crucial to creating the path past the plutocratic nightmare of advanced capitalism that Occupy has started to expose. But making the "old left" the enemy at this point seems overly defensive, and potentially leading to Stalinist Worker Party-style purity tests, purges, brainwashing, etc. It seems to me that the more people who understand how the Big Money plutocracy unjustly dominates our society, the better the ability we have to do something about it. If mainstream liberal organizations are going to spread the word on plutocracy, they should be encouraged. Then we proponents of radical democracy -- who will continue to organize ourselves and recruit others in accord with our deeper principles in any case -- should be ready to demonstrate how our approach is ultimately the best way forward, better than expecting to solve our problems by voting for Democracts or 'conscious consumerism' or whatever the non-radicals try to put forward as the answer.

Anonymous

Interesting notion. I'm surprised that Code Pink and the Rukus Society would get on board with 99% Spring if it is truly a threat to Occupy. While I am not really threatened by MoveOn, and believe that we have more power to co-opt the MoveOn message then they do the Occupy message, I believe that your point about keeping the movement radical and free is right on. Thanks for fighting the good fight...

Anonymous

Maybe we should start a campaign to get Code Pink and Ruckus to resign from MoveOn's front-group and stop giving it a semblance of legitimacy?

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.