Adbusters

Chris Hedges

What's left of the country?

COURTNEY SACCO

The global struggle for real democracy has reached a precious moment of truth: In Egypt, the Tahrir Uprising has morphed into an unpopular Presidential election where neither candidate represents the youth who sparked the revolution. In Wisconsin, a vibrant bottom-up insurgency has resulted in a humiliating electoral defeat. Meanwhile in Greece, an openly fascistic party is gaining momentum. And then there is Occupy which has thus far been unable to recapture the magic we created last year.

Who has the vision? Who has the memes? We’re at a fork in the road … a tipping point moment in the global meme war and we on the Left have a lot of soul searching to do.

Here is an inspiring article by Chris Hedges from Adbusters #102 to set the tone for the days ahead:

What was left of electoral politics in the United States gasped and sputtered to its extinction with the 2010 Supreme Court ruling known as Citizens United. At that point the game was over. Legalized bribery now defines the political process. The most retrograde elements of corporate capitalism, such as the Koch brothers, are the undisputed king makers. They decide who gets elected by anonymously pouring hundreds of millions into campaigns. They hang with their SuperPACs like vultures over the heads of every federal and state legislator. Any politician who dares to challenge corporate demands and unregulated corporate capitalism knows they will be thrust from political life as well as their highly paid corporate jobs once they leave office. Politicians, including Barack Obama, are corporate employees. And they know it.

Corporate money had corrupted the American political system even before the 2010 Citizens United ruling. We had 35,000 corporate lobbyists in Washington by 2010 writing legislation and funneling corporate donations to compliant politicians. But the ruling snuffed out even tepid and marginal resistance. It transformed us into an oligarchic, corporate state. It marked, in essence, the culmination of the corporate coup d’état that has slowly been established over the past few decades. We can identify our individuality through brands or choices in lifestyle, but political freedom does not exist.

Our highly choreographed campaigns are bizarre spectacles, sterile and empty acts of political theater. The personal narrative of candidates is the central point of debate, not issues, programs or policies. The rhetoric and style is different – in short the brands are different– between Republicans and Democrats, but the substance is the same. It is impossible within the political system in the United States to vote against the interests of Goldman Sachs or ExxonMobil. Political debate is dominated by opinion rather than fact. Lies are true.

The right-wing Heritage Foundation, for example, designed Obama’s healthcare bill. It was first put into practice by then-Governor Mitt Romney in 2006 in Massachusetts. Barack Obama adopted it, after corporate lobbyists for the pharmaceutical and insurance industries rewrote it to include $447 billion in subsidies. Romneycare is Obamacare. It forces consumers to buy a default corporate product. The insurance companies can raise co-payments and premiums, including for the elderly and those on fixed income. They are exempted from providing coverage to chronically ill children. Once you get sick you can be priced out of the market. Of the one million Americans who go bankrupt every year because they cannot pay their medical bills, 80 percent are insured. This abuse will remain untouched. The healthy will pay. The sick will be pushed aside.

The debate on the airwaves between Republicans and Democrats over the healthcare bill, now before the Supreme Court, is part of the vast dumb show. And this is true for every piece of legislation pushed through Congress. The corporate media exists not to illuminate but to perpetuate the mirage. Coke or Pepsi. Take your pick. As if there is a difference.

The capturing of the legislature, executive and judiciary by corporate power, however, is only the first stage. We have now entered the second. The corporate state, led by Congress and the Supreme Court, is rapidly criminalizing dissent. The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which was a bipartisan bill signed into law on New Year’s Eve by Obama, permits the US government to employ the military as a domestic police force that can detain citizens accused of supporting terrorist groups or “associated forces” without due process until, in the language of the law, the end of hostilities. Obama has employed the Espionage Act against government officials who have leaked information about war crimes to the press, virtually shutting down investigative reporting. Only the official narrative now prevails. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Amendment Act (FISA) retroactively made legal what under our Constitution was illegal, the warrantless wiretapping, monitoring and eavesdropping on citizens. And the Supreme Court, utterly inverting the concept of the rule of law, recently ruled that those who are strip-searched by police or corrections officers, even if they are innocent of a crime, couldn’t challenge the measures in a court of law. In short, there is no legal recourse to the abuse of power.

The corporations will disembowel, or in the language of business schools “harvest,” what is left of the country. The security and surveillance apparatus will lock up those who resist. This is the future. The iron circle will be shut tight.

Chris Hedges is a Pulitzer Prize winning author and former international correspondent for The New York Times. His latest book is The World As It Is: Dispatches on the Myth of Human Progress.

200 comments on the article “Chris Hedges”

Displaying 71 - 80 of 200

Page 8 of 20

Anonymous

as if any militia in the states would side with a bunch of Che wannabees, in case you aren't up with their ideology they kind of have this thing against sinister left wing types, in fact they think you already own the government! They more likely to turn their guns on you (think the AUC in columbia) But it's hard to argue that in this case you are not sinister left wingers when your clearly humoring the idea of using extreme violence where civility has failed. So basically you would be up against right wing death squads AND the US Military. I'm surprised the thought never occurred to you clowns. I won't be placing my money on your cause winning out in the end.

Anonymous

If the Military/unLaw Enforcement ever promoted on the basis of making comments that are unintentionally funny or downright odd you oughta make corporal.

Anonymous

How's that working in Afghanistan? Our military might can't defeat a rag-tag bunch of peasants without advanced communication tools and modern weapons. Come to think of it, it didn't work in Vietnam either...

Anonymous

yeah the military totally doesn't know how to fight and you hipsters are all regular rambos. Let me know when your ready to come back to reality little FBI stings in the making.

Anonymous

The utility of a gun:

A Gun is very powerful until you have to use it. The threat of violence has power and can keep peace. Once you start firing all bets are off. Why cooperate with someone shooting at you?

All military is based on that principle of fear. The power is always mostly imaginary. Your fantasy propping them up is a part of their reach.

I wouldn't argue for a military solution to this. You use the tactics that get you what you need. Military breeds more military. That is not what we need.

However, don't give power to the military that you don't need to. The military is made up of citizens. If the citizens decided to change the direction or redirect the military to do something useful or helpful instead of what is happening now then it would be done. Direct action is not violence unless your goal it to hurt. Direct action IS ignoring what we are supposed to do and deciding and carrying out what we should do. We always have the power.

The real threat is bad communication so that we are prevented from acting together. That is the harm of the corporate media systems.

Sheller

so...you don't think 10s to 100s of millions of people, even if they're armed, could defeat the mere 10s of thousands of available military and police forces? You're not good at crunching numbers, are you. Obviously that scenerio (every citizen) would never happen, but still there's way more citizens then there are military, and in the States many citizens are armed with automatic weaponry and other big guns (whether or not they have the morality and conscience and intellignece to know when to use them and for who is a different story) and pissed. Also, I agree with other posters that in the post NDAA age, many service members would have the good conscience to do what's right if the times got just desperate enough. Many certainly wouldn't, but many also would. Their tactical training advantage is something to consider too, but really many normal citizens might have at least similar physical training of some sort. And ex-military personnel perhaps could teach other citizens tactics and pass on inside information.

The only thing i worry about is the huge stock of nuclear weaponry they would have at their disposal. Biological and drone warfare is a concern tho; however, certain citizens, like ex-military personnel or just maverick science types eager to help out, could put that to use too. But it's the nukes that are a different story...unless some maverick group of concerned and ingenius (and ingeniously secretive) citizens educated in nuclear physics and engineering could make them -- or if some could be stolen -- or make deals with members of other countries to purchase them.

I wouldn't want any of that to happen of course. All peaceful, civil, creative, and more rational/reasonable attempts to change the status quo must be exhasted first. Believe it or not, I don't think we're quite there yet.

I just wish we could all open a dialogue and show respect for each other. But instead what's going on is the government is disrespecting the people and the people are disrespectng it. It's a toxic stagnation in contempt, with the gov't currently the one having the power to show their contempt in a much more debilitating way. There's a great hatred now between the gov't and its people --- and why should that be? What has caused this nightmare? Why were we all so asleep to not see this monster come crawling up to our chests to suffocate us all?

Anonymous

If we all learn Krav Maga and aikido they can't do much but pull out their guns and shoot us. Then we get our guns and shoot them. We move into Staten Island and hold up with the Wu Tang Clan. Then we wait for the shogun. Simple.

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.