Adbusters

Chris Hedges

What's left of the country?

COURTNEY SACCO

The global struggle for real democracy has reached a precious moment of truth: In Egypt, the Tahrir Uprising has morphed into an unpopular Presidential election where neither candidate represents the youth who sparked the revolution. In Wisconsin, a vibrant bottom-up insurgency has resulted in a humiliating electoral defeat. Meanwhile in Greece, an openly fascistic party is gaining momentum. And then there is Occupy which has thus far been unable to recapture the magic we created last year.

Who has the vision? Who has the memes? We’re at a fork in the road … a tipping point moment in the global meme war and we on the Left have a lot of soul searching to do.

Here is an inspiring article by Chris Hedges from Adbusters #102 to set the tone for the days ahead:

What was left of electoral politics in the United States gasped and sputtered to its extinction with the 2010 Supreme Court ruling known as Citizens United. At that point the game was over. Legalized bribery now defines the political process. The most retrograde elements of corporate capitalism, such as the Koch brothers, are the undisputed king makers. They decide who gets elected by anonymously pouring hundreds of millions into campaigns. They hang with their SuperPACs like vultures over the heads of every federal and state legislator. Any politician who dares to challenge corporate demands and unregulated corporate capitalism knows they will be thrust from political life as well as their highly paid corporate jobs once they leave office. Politicians, including Barack Obama, are corporate employees. And they know it.

Corporate money had corrupted the American political system even before the 2010 Citizens United ruling. We had 35,000 corporate lobbyists in Washington by 2010 writing legislation and funneling corporate donations to compliant politicians. But the ruling snuffed out even tepid and marginal resistance. It transformed us into an oligarchic, corporate state. It marked, in essence, the culmination of the corporate coup d’état that has slowly been established over the past few decades. We can identify our individuality through brands or choices in lifestyle, but political freedom does not exist.

Our highly choreographed campaigns are bizarre spectacles, sterile and empty acts of political theater. The personal narrative of candidates is the central point of debate, not issues, programs or policies. The rhetoric and style is different – in short the brands are different– between Republicans and Democrats, but the substance is the same. It is impossible within the political system in the United States to vote against the interests of Goldman Sachs or ExxonMobil. Political debate is dominated by opinion rather than fact. Lies are true.

The right-wing Heritage Foundation, for example, designed Obama’s healthcare bill. It was first put into practice by then-Governor Mitt Romney in 2006 in Massachusetts. Barack Obama adopted it, after corporate lobbyists for the pharmaceutical and insurance industries rewrote it to include $447 billion in subsidies. Romneycare is Obamacare. It forces consumers to buy a default corporate product. The insurance companies can raise co-payments and premiums, including for the elderly and those on fixed income. They are exempted from providing coverage to chronically ill children. Once you get sick you can be priced out of the market. Of the one million Americans who go bankrupt every year because they cannot pay their medical bills, 80 percent are insured. This abuse will remain untouched. The healthy will pay. The sick will be pushed aside.

The debate on the airwaves between Republicans and Democrats over the healthcare bill, now before the Supreme Court, is part of the vast dumb show. And this is true for every piece of legislation pushed through Congress. The corporate media exists not to illuminate but to perpetuate the mirage. Coke or Pepsi. Take your pick. As if there is a difference.

The capturing of the legislature, executive and judiciary by corporate power, however, is only the first stage. We have now entered the second. The corporate state, led by Congress and the Supreme Court, is rapidly criminalizing dissent. The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which was a bipartisan bill signed into law on New Year’s Eve by Obama, permits the US government to employ the military as a domestic police force that can detain citizens accused of supporting terrorist groups or “associated forces” without due process until, in the language of the law, the end of hostilities. Obama has employed the Espionage Act against government officials who have leaked information about war crimes to the press, virtually shutting down investigative reporting. Only the official narrative now prevails. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Amendment Act (FISA) retroactively made legal what under our Constitution was illegal, the warrantless wiretapping, monitoring and eavesdropping on citizens. And the Supreme Court, utterly inverting the concept of the rule of law, recently ruled that those who are strip-searched by police or corrections officers, even if they are innocent of a crime, couldn’t challenge the measures in a court of law. In short, there is no legal recourse to the abuse of power.

The corporations will disembowel, or in the language of business schools “harvest,” what is left of the country. The security and surveillance apparatus will lock up those who resist. This is the future. The iron circle will be shut tight.

Chris Hedges is a Pulitzer Prize winning author and former international correspondent for The New York Times. His latest book is The World As It Is: Dispatches on the Myth of Human Progress.

200 comments on the article “Chris Hedges”

Displaying 41 - 50 of 200

Page 5 of 20

Anonymous

As a movement you don't have to concentrate on the immediate, it is very rare that a movement wins immediately everything it wants. I have been in the antiracist movements (and there is still racism around), I have been in the peace movement (and there is still war around) and a few others I can't even name. Each movement didn't win all the time everything it wanted, but each of them has changed the society dramatically in two ways. First there has been a new voice and opinion that got a place in the media and the official media discourse has changed, because it had to take another voice into consideration - even if it didn't agree. As long as they talk about you, you exist. Secondly each of these movements have afterwards got legistive, lobby and other initiatives going (the structural aspects of a long-term movement). It is good to have a leaderless movement and Occupy is just a tactic and Anonymous is just a rallying cry as diverse as any of the two movements described above are (and the antiglobalist movements you should know well, were).

But when you look back 10 years ago, how would the world have been if there haven't been the antiglobalist movement ? How many freetrade wildwest agreements would have been signed ? How would the agenda of all those international conferences has looked without all the attention nowadays to our social and ecological demands ?

Every now and than a movement is called dying or dead. The same with feminism, syndicalism, socialism and so on. The problem with all that is that they forget that before these movements became movements, that they were only platforms on which people of many different opnions and horizons found each other and inspired and influenced each other. Occupy and Anonymous are still Platforms and maybe they will never be a movement and only be the platform that our splintered collection of movements needs (just as the antiglobalist forums were platforms).

Now and than somebody got tired because he has been active too long and asks himself what the use is of it all or somebody new thought that he would have bigger results (forgetting for a moment that even the biggest movements only represent a tiny segment of the population and that revolutions and movements are made by a few hundred people and the rest following all along or standing by).

So it is maybe also time to look back and say 'if somebody would have said two years ago that we would push the tea party of the political horizon in the media for about a year, that thousands of people would participate in the US in the biggest social movement since the antiglobalisation movement and the mystical overhyped 60's, if somebody would say that the public and the political discourse would have been influenced in the way we did it, than you would say 'no way, you are dreaming this is not possible'

it was possible
it is possible
it will continue

get your head up and inspire people, that is your function
you are adbusters, you inspire people, get them to move, get them on your feet
leave those reflections for people who never insprired anyone to do anything

belsec.skynetblogs.be

Anonymous

I hate to say it, but this is what the second amendment was made for. And if ever it is going to work, it would be while our military is deployed in 3 other losing wars over sees....

I'm not advocating violence. But they are.

Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable. -- JFK

Anonymous

If the planet is to survive with good people the U.S. Military must be defeated and abolished at home and globally. That is the focal point and it's quite clear.

Sheller

"I hate to say it, but this is what the second amendment was made for"

I agree, reluctantly. As a mostly liberal person, I always felt up until recently that the 2nd amendent was useless. Wow, was I wrong. At this point I wouldn't be surprised if the next think this pre-fascist US will do is confiscate people's guns.

I'm from Canada, and interestingly our own wannabe fascist Harper just got rid of the long-gun registry so that people buying shutguns and the like (mostly hunters anyway) no longer have their names placed in a central database.

Hey, thanks for shooting yourself in the foot, so to speak, Harpie.

Anonymous

Unfortunately there are still enough soldiers stateside to handle any kind of insurrection until back arrives (remember, they're very well trained).

The good news is that it is very unpopular among soldiers to shoot a US citizen; So apart from the second amendment and our Right to overthrow a government that does not represent us, we need help from the military.

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.