Adbusters

Chris Hedges

What's left of the country?

COURTNEY SACCO

The global struggle for real democracy has reached a precious moment of truth: In Egypt, the Tahrir Uprising has morphed into an unpopular Presidential election where neither candidate represents the youth who sparked the revolution. In Wisconsin, a vibrant bottom-up insurgency has resulted in a humiliating electoral defeat. Meanwhile in Greece, an openly fascistic party is gaining momentum. And then there is Occupy which has thus far been unable to recapture the magic we created last year.

Who has the vision? Who has the memes? We’re at a fork in the road … a tipping point moment in the global meme war and we on the Left have a lot of soul searching to do.

Here is an inspiring article by Chris Hedges from Adbusters #102 to set the tone for the days ahead:

What was left of electoral politics in the United States gasped and sputtered to its extinction with the 2010 Supreme Court ruling known as Citizens United. At that point the game was over. Legalized bribery now defines the political process. The most retrograde elements of corporate capitalism, such as the Koch brothers, are the undisputed king makers. They decide who gets elected by anonymously pouring hundreds of millions into campaigns. They hang with their SuperPACs like vultures over the heads of every federal and state legislator. Any politician who dares to challenge corporate demands and unregulated corporate capitalism knows they will be thrust from political life as well as their highly paid corporate jobs once they leave office. Politicians, including Barack Obama, are corporate employees. And they know it.

Corporate money had corrupted the American political system even before the 2010 Citizens United ruling. We had 35,000 corporate lobbyists in Washington by 2010 writing legislation and funneling corporate donations to compliant politicians. But the ruling snuffed out even tepid and marginal resistance. It transformed us into an oligarchic, corporate state. It marked, in essence, the culmination of the corporate coup d’état that has slowly been established over the past few decades. We can identify our individuality through brands or choices in lifestyle, but political freedom does not exist.

Our highly choreographed campaigns are bizarre spectacles, sterile and empty acts of political theater. The personal narrative of candidates is the central point of debate, not issues, programs or policies. The rhetoric and style is different – in short the brands are different– between Republicans and Democrats, but the substance is the same. It is impossible within the political system in the United States to vote against the interests of Goldman Sachs or ExxonMobil. Political debate is dominated by opinion rather than fact. Lies are true.

The right-wing Heritage Foundation, for example, designed Obama’s healthcare bill. It was first put into practice by then-Governor Mitt Romney in 2006 in Massachusetts. Barack Obama adopted it, after corporate lobbyists for the pharmaceutical and insurance industries rewrote it to include $447 billion in subsidies. Romneycare is Obamacare. It forces consumers to buy a default corporate product. The insurance companies can raise co-payments and premiums, including for the elderly and those on fixed income. They are exempted from providing coverage to chronically ill children. Once you get sick you can be priced out of the market. Of the one million Americans who go bankrupt every year because they cannot pay their medical bills, 80 percent are insured. This abuse will remain untouched. The healthy will pay. The sick will be pushed aside.

The debate on the airwaves between Republicans and Democrats over the healthcare bill, now before the Supreme Court, is part of the vast dumb show. And this is true for every piece of legislation pushed through Congress. The corporate media exists not to illuminate but to perpetuate the mirage. Coke or Pepsi. Take your pick. As if there is a difference.

The capturing of the legislature, executive and judiciary by corporate power, however, is only the first stage. We have now entered the second. The corporate state, led by Congress and the Supreme Court, is rapidly criminalizing dissent. The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which was a bipartisan bill signed into law on New Year’s Eve by Obama, permits the US government to employ the military as a domestic police force that can detain citizens accused of supporting terrorist groups or “associated forces” without due process until, in the language of the law, the end of hostilities. Obama has employed the Espionage Act against government officials who have leaked information about war crimes to the press, virtually shutting down investigative reporting. Only the official narrative now prevails. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Amendment Act (FISA) retroactively made legal what under our Constitution was illegal, the warrantless wiretapping, monitoring and eavesdropping on citizens. And the Supreme Court, utterly inverting the concept of the rule of law, recently ruled that those who are strip-searched by police or corrections officers, even if they are innocent of a crime, couldn’t challenge the measures in a court of law. In short, there is no legal recourse to the abuse of power.

The corporations will disembowel, or in the language of business schools “harvest,” what is left of the country. The security and surveillance apparatus will lock up those who resist. This is the future. The iron circle will be shut tight.

Chris Hedges is a Pulitzer Prize winning author and former international correspondent for The New York Times. His latest book is The World As It Is: Dispatches on the Myth of Human Progress.

200 comments on the article “Chris Hedges”

Displaying 191 - 200 of 200

Page 20 of 20

Anonymous

Those in Occupy, including Hedges and "Adbusters", who have been broadcasting apocalyptic messages yet have done little to nothing to empathetically engage the public. All I have seen from the self-appointed leaders and scribes of Occupy is borderline-defeatist nonsense. You cannot possibly win the necessary support of the public with that kind of message.

Anonymous

On the issue of mass mind-control and disinformation, while people have been carefully brainwashed over the years - and need to be unplugged from the system - have Occupy or Adbusters ever called the public stupid?

Anonymous

Yet this makes no sense what-so-ever. For, given that these are the very minds/people they are trying to save, how would insulting them help?

Anonymous

I really agree with the statements you have made. People are quick to make sweeping statements that shine a negative light on the situation, but in reality no1 is actually doing or saying anything really. Its all rather cynical and a bit on the downer-side of life.

Anonymous

It seems like you don't really know Chomsky's work, because he's the first to expound on the similarities between the two parties besides semantics, so why would it matter who's elected? Hedge's isn't a nihilist, he's just a realist. If you'd read any of his books, you'd know.

If only those pesky Republicans were wiped out, things would be just dandy, right?

Good cop/bad cop. You can't have an abuser without an enabler. Understanding what you're really up against, is just the first step.

steve from virginia

Young people want to change the world ... they don't know how.

They don't know the world is already changing under their feet, they don't know what form the change is taking. If they understood they would freak out.

The last 400 years have seen non-stop industrialization and necessary credit expansion. Accommodating the desires of increasing multitudes was possible because resources were available to waste. The wasting process itself was what we believed with all our hearts to be progress. We believed -- led by those who claimed to know better -- that wasting more today, every day would lead to some sort of perfected human experience ... someday in the future ...

Tomorrow::Utopia along with flying cars will show up tomorrow ...

Progress was always predicated on industrial interests having access to the next water supply, the next coal deposit, the next oil reservoir, the next coastline for those nuclear power stations. We are at the end of 400 years of industrialists' promises ... what have we to show for it all?

A trillion barrels of crude, two trillion tons of coal, where are our cathedrals? What assets do we have to measure against those oil/coal liabilities? We have 'money' and 'wealth': what are these things?

The game has changed because we have been too successful. Our machines have stripped the world of all of its cheap crude oil. "Small matter," say the industrialists. "Technology will save us (tomorrow)". Unfortunately, using the oil -- burning it up in cars -- never earned anything!

Neither did the hundreds of millions of cars or highways, suburbs, office buildings, airports, militaries, finance companies, insurance ... none of these things paid for themselves. All was and is financed with increasing amounts of debt: hundreds of trillions of dollars, yen, yuan, euros, roubles, riyals, sterling ... that are now standing due and payable!

If industry was productive -- if machines could pay -- adding more machines would solve our economic troubles. There would be no debts because our industrial production would have paid them. Instead, pensioners,, customers, children, and the greater world are thrown into the furnace: the debts cannot be paid, the machines cannot earn anything. They simply are toys to provide entertainment, borrowed profits for the machine-makers and sellers..

The trouble we face is the depletion of necessary resources and a fight over what remains. The establishment has chosen easy-to-rationalize social Darwinism as a strategy. The ordinary citizens have no idea what is going on. As a result, the citizens lose over and over.

The first step is for people to step away from the waste: doing so bankrupts the Darwinists. On the personal level that means ditching the car and the TV, paying off the debts or walking away from them. It also means a new political idea, one that puts conservation in first place rather than Business As Usual and burning scapegoats at the stake.

Young people can learn, the first thing is the world has changed and there is less to be distributed, what must be done is to embrace it. Less is a hard school but the alternative is much harder.

Anonymous

"If the Military/unLaw Enforcement ever promoted on the basis of making comments that are unintentionally funny or downright odd you oughta make corporal."

if deranged paranoia was a sport, you'd be a gold medalist.

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.