Adbusters

American Pussy Riot

A call for revolution in the New York Times?

DENIS SINYAKOV/REUTERS

American zealots for the recently convicted Russian punk rock trio Pussy Riot don’t know what they’re actually supporting, says New York Times Russian columnist Vadim Nikitin. If they did, they might think twice – Pussy Riot stands for ideals most American liberals, let alone conservatives, don’t really want. The US has a long history of loving their competitors’ dissidents. And Russia, either communist or oligarchical, has always proven to be the perfect foil.

Here’s what Vadim Nikitin has to say:

From Madonna to Björk, from the elite New Yorker to the populist Daily Mail, the world united in supporting Russia’s irreverent feminist activists Pussy Riot against the blunt cruelty inflicted on them by the state. It may not have stopped Vladimir Putin’s kangaroo court from sentencing them to two years in prison on charges of hooliganism, but blanket international media pressure helped turn the case into a major embarrassment for the Kremlin.

Yet there is something about the West’s embrace of the young women’s cause that should make us deeply uneasy, as Pussy Riot’s philosophy, activism and even music quickly took second place to its usefulness in discrediting one of America’s geopolitical foes. Twenty years after the end of the Cold War, are dissident intellectuals once again in danger of becoming pawns in the West’s anti-Russian narrative?

Back in the ’70s, the United States and its allies cared little about what Soviet dissidents were actually saying, so long as it was aimed against the Kremlin. No wonder so many Americans who had never read Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s books cheered when he dissed the Soviet Union later felt so shocked, offended and even betrayed when he criticized many of the same shortcomings in his adoptive homeland. Wasn’t this guy supposed to be on our side?

Using dissidents to score political points against the Russian regime is as dangerous as adopting a pet tiger: No matter how domesticated they may seem, in the end they are free spirits, liable to maul the hand that feeds them.

Read the rest of the article here.

25 comments on the article “American Pussy Riot”

Displaying 21 - 25 of 25

Page 3 of 3

Anonymous

I am all for fighting for ones believes and I happen to be american, however I do not believe in blaming a nation you have almost zero knowledge of. Every nation has their strengths and weaknesses, bashing the USA for no other reason than their name is USA is just plain ignorance. Reading a news paper of what your nation believes or a reporter does not make it fact, proof makes it fact. Learn some critical thinking skills, in hopes of not making your countries offspring seen weak minded as you have done.

Anonymous

What has happened to this publication? Is this article seriously attempting to cuddle up and pretend that we share the same insane ideals as the author? Come on man this is pathetic. Listen to the f#£%ing lyrics. These girls have got balls. They have heart and far more respect for the message of true spirituality than the politics of the church. That's the point! Trolls are breeding like rabies!

Anonymous

Even if you didn't agree with these women and their lyrics, the author of this blog post is attempting to justify their imprisonment for speaking their minds.

If you agree that free speech should be quashed by the state at its pleasure, as was done in Russia to these women, then you are also advocating that this website could be shut down by the state at any time, and that anyone who takes part in Occupy protests also be arrested and imprisoned.

Our democracies protect our rights to speak freely.

Thank God we are living in the free world and not in Russia, because over there, we could all be in prison by now.

my_first_tattoo

Hi. Read the entire article in the New York Times. All of it. Pay attention to the last paragraph. The NYT article is a very subtle, almost sarcastic criticism of the media and is saying in undertones that by supporting Pussy Riot you are supporting the movement for change here as well.
"Because what Pussy Riot wants is something that is equally terrifying, provocative and threatening to the established order in both Russia and the West (and has been from time immemorial): freedom from patriarchy, capitalism, religion, conventional morality, inequality and the entire corporate state system."

Anonymous

Pussy Riot protested injustice and inequality with an artistic expression. They screamed and we listened. But in a country with deeply rooted political/religious entanglement using fear to control, they should have made their protest more elegantly. Claims that they offended believers has blurred Pussy Riot's original message and have given the governing powers an excuse to cage them. Is their sentence really remarkable, or should they have seen it coming? As Russia faces global scrutiny, what is the rest of the world doing to uphold democracy? http://mayorgate.blogspot.com/2012/08/pussy-riot-censored-by-disappropriate.html

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.