Adbusters

American Pussy Riot

A call for revolution in the New York Times?

DENIS SINYAKOV/REUTERS

American zealots for the recently convicted Russian punk rock trio Pussy Riot don’t know what they’re actually supporting, says New York Times Russian columnist Vadim Nikitin. If they did, they might think twice – Pussy Riot stands for ideals most American liberals, let alone conservatives, don’t really want. The US has a long history of loving their competitors’ dissidents. And Russia, either communist or oligarchical, has always proven to be the perfect foil.

Here’s what Vadim Nikitin has to say:

From Madonna to Björk, from the elite New Yorker to the populist Daily Mail, the world united in supporting Russia’s irreverent feminist activists Pussy Riot against the blunt cruelty inflicted on them by the state. It may not have stopped Vladimir Putin’s kangaroo court from sentencing them to two years in prison on charges of hooliganism, but blanket international media pressure helped turn the case into a major embarrassment for the Kremlin.

Yet there is something about the West’s embrace of the young women’s cause that should make us deeply uneasy, as Pussy Riot’s philosophy, activism and even music quickly took second place to its usefulness in discrediting one of America’s geopolitical foes. Twenty years after the end of the Cold War, are dissident intellectuals once again in danger of becoming pawns in the West’s anti-Russian narrative?

Back in the ’70s, the United States and its allies cared little about what Soviet dissidents were actually saying, so long as it was aimed against the Kremlin. No wonder so many Americans who had never read Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s books cheered when he dissed the Soviet Union later felt so shocked, offended and even betrayed when he criticized many of the same shortcomings in his adoptive homeland. Wasn’t this guy supposed to be on our side?

Using dissidents to score political points against the Russian regime is as dangerous as adopting a pet tiger: No matter how domesticated they may seem, in the end they are free spirits, liable to maul the hand that feeds them.

Read the rest of the article here.

25 comments on the article “American Pussy Riot”

Displaying 1 - 10 of 25

Page 1 of 3

freedom?

I thought that the Pussy Riot bandwagon was filling up with a few too many people, which ultimately meant it was nothing but tittilating fodder for the news cycle. I never heard anyone speculate on what would have happened in similar circumstances in the West, especially the US or Canada--what if a band *who had clashed with cops in the past) wearing balaklavas set up in a Baptist church in Kansas, for instance, and started blasting pro-choice rhetoric? Or set up in an Ottawa cathedral wanking out an anti-Harper message? Seems to me that what happened at the G20 in Toronto was pretty good demonstration of how it would be dealt with, as G20 activists now sit in jail or are under house arrest. All that was seen almost as a matter of course in spite of all the inquiries and wrongful police actions. I mean heck, here is a country, Canada, who protects police even if they kill innocent people. I don't know what they do to people in Russia who having an anxiety attack in an airport while holding a stapler. Maybe they shoot them dead and protect those who did it.

Anonymous

I think more dangerous than the dissident tiger is the regime safari tourist who will shoot the penned tiger in the head and then sell its bones to Chinese herbal remedy shops for making wine.

Anonymous

Remarkable! An entire article, decrying Pussy Riot's message, without EVER mentioning the message! Nice of the Western media to further silence them. Bad grrls prayed in church! tsk tsk

Anonymous

"freedom from patriarchy, capitalism, religion, conventional morality, inequality and the entire corporate state system."

Anonymous

I don't stand behind Pussy Riot because they're anti-Russia; I stand with them because they're anti-patriarchal and anti-statist.

freedomtorch@gm...

So you are saying Americans should not support these women because they would also criticize the American system like they criticize their own, which means "biting the hand that feeds them"? Ludicrous.

Anonymous

I think they are saying:

"Pussy Riot’s fans in the West need to understand that their heroes’ dissent will not stop at Putin; neither will it stop if and when Russia becomes a “normal” liberal democracy. Because what Pussy Riot wants is something that is equally terrifying, provocative and threatening to the established order in both Russia and the West (and has been from time immemorial): freedom from patriarchy, capitalism, religion, conventional morality, inequality and the entire corporate state system. We should only support these brave women if we, too, are brave enough to go all the way. "

Anonymous

Thank you for an articulate explanation of what this article is hinting at. It is true that Pussy Riot and their rotating/expanding members and related groups want freedom from patriarchy, capitalism, religion, etc. Our western media and government has exposed their own hypocrisy by denouncing Russia for censoring and jailing Pussy Riot.

Pages

Add a new comment

Comments are closed.